civic vs minivan
Originally posted by Nathan1234
But the S2000 was ever so slightly behind the Boxster S..... and get this one.... over a full second behind a no option 2001 Camaro SS. So I'd say your theory about the Camaro is more than a little off (unless the track is REALLY twisty and has no straights to speak of).
But you are definitely correct about it beating a GT.
But the S2000 was ever so slightly behind the Boxster S..... and get this one.... over a full second behind a no option 2001 Camaro SS. So I'd say your theory about the Camaro is more than a little off (unless the track is REALLY twisty and has no straights to speak of).
But you are definitely correct about it beating a GT.
http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....ber=1&preview=
Here you go.
I just realized now that I re-read the article.... the Z06 was in second behind only the Ferrari 360. And this is the "slow" 385 Hp Z06. I'd like to see what the times would be like if they compared the '02 Z06 (with 20 more hp and a tweaked suspension) against the relatively unchanged '02 Ferrari 360.
Here you go.
I just realized now that I re-read the article.... the Z06 was in second behind only the Ferrari 360. And this is the "slow" 385 Hp Z06. I'd like to see what the times would be like if they compared the '02 Z06 (with 20 more hp and a tweaked suspension) against the relatively unchanged '02 Ferrari 360.
yea but ferrari jsut came out with the new 360 somin taht start with an s that they dropped a bunch of weight paddle shift made the launch control alout better and messed with the handiling so the 360 may still win
u must keep in mind tho that all those numbers were from wet road conditions and is comparable for wet condition comparsions only the s200 jumping to 60 on 4.9 sec tahts only form the less traction and the ability to keep the motor spooled up so take that into consideration. To bad we didnt get to see a mustang in there becasue stock there handeling trully does suck
I've got a race set up for Thursday with Diablo. Not sure what it'll prove since my car is neither light weight or high reving and he doesn't want me to "borrow" something that is. But to fore warn anyone else who thinks "calling me out" will shut me up, it won't. I'm right about this, so you dumb-estic drivers will just have to be enlightened or frustrated... take your pick.
Fast-Ford... to answer your question: The reason 4cyl and 8cyl cars do not compete in sanctioned racing events is because the 4cyls are clearly out matched.
Now answer my question... What do you drive?
Fast-Ford... to answer your question: The reason 4cyl and 8cyl cars do not compete in sanctioned racing events is because the 4cyls are clearly out matched.
Now answer my question... What do you drive?
Originally posted by Integrity
I've got a race set up for Thursday with Diablo. Not sure what it'll prove since my car is neither light weight or high reving and he doesn't want me to "borrow" something that is. But to fore warn anyone else who thinks "calling me out" will shut me up, it won't. I'm right about this, so you dumb-estic drivers will just have to be enlightened or frustrated... take your pick.
Fast-Ford... to answer your question: The reason 4cyl and 8cyl cars do not compete in sanctioned racing events is because the 4cyls are clearly out matched.
Now answer my question... What do you drive?
I've got a race set up for Thursday with Diablo. Not sure what it'll prove since my car is neither light weight or high reving and he doesn't want me to "borrow" something that is. But to fore warn anyone else who thinks "calling me out" will shut me up, it won't. I'm right about this, so you dumb-estic drivers will just have to be enlightened or frustrated... take your pick.
Fast-Ford... to answer your question: The reason 4cyl and 8cyl cars do not compete in sanctioned racing events is because the 4cyls are clearly out matched.
Now answer my question... What do you drive?
The upgrade plan is for suspension first, then the rear end, then a crate engine while keeping the appearence mostly stock. The car is in storrage for the winter. I will be making some upgrades this spring.....but I haven't finalized what I'm buying yet. I'm not gonna sit here and shoot off about supercharging it and stuff because that's not what I'm doing with it. It is safe to say that it will certainly have long tube headers and a pro-chamber h-pipe put on but I'm still working out which suspension changes will take place. The car has to walk a fine line between being a good daily driver, and a performer when I want to put my foot in it. Building a suspension to do that takes a bit of investigation on what combination of parts to use. I don't care if the guys at work Turbo their RSX's and get more speed. I'm after a combination that I am happy driving, and that has extreme durability. The car has no trouble turning heads (it's yellow, has a leather interior, and has polished aluminum 5 star rims) and it more than holds it's own on the road.......but I'm not making changes based on what "other" people are doing. I'm building a car that I will enjoy driving and suits my driving style..........which is what everyone who loves cars does right?
Don't look for it to be a super street rod either, at best I may be adding 25 horses at the most.......not enough to make me run down to the dyno shop that's for sure. The headers and exhaust will be added to make it produce a deep sound, the same way I intended with the Flowmasters not for a power adder. Does that answer your question?
Originally posted by ludeboom
you do realize that is from over a year ago right?
what is the current news on a team that "After narrowly missing the Grand Sport II championship last season..."
all im sayin is that it is obviously a column biased toward ford's
btw champ, what is wrong with magazines like superstreet, SCC and "import tuner" ? :bandito:
you do realize that is from over a year ago right?
what is the current news on a team that "After narrowly missing the Grand Sport II championship last season..."
all im sayin is that it is obviously a column biased toward ford's
btw champ, what is wrong with magazines like superstreet, SCC and "import tuner" ? :bandito:
That column was not biased toward Ford, it was direct from the sanctioning body merely reporting the success of the Mustang in that series. People think I'm kidding when I'm talking about road race set ups being effective on the Mustang.
What people see at "open" track weekends or on the street doesn't make a valid arguement because of the lack of rules or giudelines. I am showing you hard proof from sanctioned racing series that torque and power makes the difference. The BMW's in that series also run V8's and they are also successful.
Nothing is wrong with Import Tuner, I just find that people who read it (having no prior car or racing knowledge) may tend to get wrong impressions because they focus on weekend bracket racing and street car setups a lot.........which is cool for people who want to race a bit and have a street car - but just don't take it to the extreme and think that a car like a Celica, Triburon, Civic, RSX or S2000 is going to take on a fully prepared Mustang, BMW, or Porsche on a road course. I am not lying when I say that big torque is needed in serious road race competition.
Originally posted by Fast-Ford
but just don't take it to the extreme and think that a car like a Celica, Triburon, Civic, RSX or S2000 is going to take on a fully prepared Mustang, BMW, or Porsche on a road course. I am not lying when I say that big torque is needed in serious road race competition.
but just don't take it to the extreme and think that a car like a Celica, Triburon, Civic, RSX or S2000 is going to take on a fully prepared Mustang, BMW, or Porsche on a road course. I am not lying when I say that big torque is needed in serious road race competition.
Originally posted by Fast-Ford
I drive a 2003 Mustang GT........bone stock except for a Flowmaster catback which I put on for sound
I drive a 2003 Mustang GT........bone stock except for a Flowmaster catback which I put on for sound
Originally posted by Fast-Ford
I'm building a car that I will enjoy driving and suits my driving style..........which is what everyone who loves cars does right?
I'm building a car that I will enjoy driving and suits my driving style..........which is what everyone who loves cars does right?
Originally posted by Fast-Ford
but just don't take it to the extreme and think that a car like a Celica, Triburon, Civic, RSX or S2000 is going to take on a fully prepared Mustang, BMW, or Porsche on a road course.
but just don't take it to the extreme and think that a car like a Celica, Triburon, Civic, RSX or S2000 is going to take on a fully prepared Mustang, BMW, or Porsche on a road course.
Look, I don't even drive an S2000. I used to drive an ITR. I've raced many Mustang owners with the same mentality as yours (on the street and on the track) who thought they're TORQUE was enough to win. It wasn't, there's simply TOO many other factors. Now you can argue that sanctioned racing events remove such factors, but that doesn't discredit what I'm saying.
I drive a Civic and 350Z. The Civic is being modded slowly and the Z is staying stock for atleast another 4,000 miles. If anything, the Z is similar to a domestic with its high torque and heavy weight. I'm just not silly enough to believe that my 274ft/lbs are going to keep me from getting stomped by some of these imports running around.
I've got a race set up for Thursday with Diablo. Not sure what it'll prove since my car is neither light weight or high reving and he doesn't want me to "borrow" something that is. But to fore warn anyone else who thinks "calling me out" will shut me up, it won't. I'm right about this, so you dumb-estic drivers will just have to be enlightened or frustrated... take your pick.
P.S. dont worry i wont shut up either if i lose,


