type s aint that fast
Originally Posted by ZiviCase10287
wtf i hate how v8 lovers always use their excuses of v8's.. no shit you'll gain more... end of that g*y shit.
anyway forgetting about that v8 lover that doesn't know what LSD is... the K20 loves mods. my friend ran his stock RSX-S at 15.3 at the track and i've seen faster stock... he got a CAI and Greddy EVO exhaust.. THATS IT and ran a 14.6 at the track, .7 off for a CAI and exhaust? shit i wish any 4cyl engine could do that
also my other friend has a 01 civic ex with K20A swap in it with everything for N/A pretty much.. we think he's in the 12's with it.. if you Super Street guys have the November 03 issue, his car is in the Hot Import Nights part... last page: white civic, full Xennon body kit, blue seats, CF hood.. they talk about his car in the article also.
anyway forgetting about that v8 lover that doesn't know what LSD is... the K20 loves mods. my friend ran his stock RSX-S at 15.3 at the track and i've seen faster stock... he got a CAI and Greddy EVO exhaust.. THATS IT and ran a 14.6 at the track, .7 off for a CAI and exhaust? shit i wish any 4cyl engine could do that
also my other friend has a 01 civic ex with K20A swap in it with everything for N/A pretty much.. we think he's in the 12's with it.. if you Super Street guys have the November 03 issue, his car is in the Hot Import Nights part... last page: white civic, full Xennon body kit, blue seats, CF hood.. they talk about his car in the article also.
Whether I like V8's or not, the RSX is weak down low and whether a car starts out with 30 more HP or not, it's the torque and how it pulls the gear that matters.
BTW I know exactly what LSD is except under a different name: 8.8 Traction Loc. If you're still going to flame me for confusing LSD because I wasn't familiar with the acronym then fine.
Originally Posted by Fast-Ford
where it was mentioned "never seen an NA car respond so well to mods"..........ANYWAY what excuses are there?
Originally Posted by Integrity
Maybe because the guy's always been into imports.
Originally Posted by Fast-Ford
Whether I like V8's or not, the RSX is weak down low and whether a car starts out with 30 more HP or not, it's the torque and how it pulls the gear that matters.
get some stage 1 cams springs and that hondata tune and you can redline up to 9000 and get 35 hp more to the wheels. then a good intake header exaust yeilds around 25 hp to the ground
Originally Posted by DriveItLikeItsS
rsx-s bout half a second faster stock to stock against a gsr. bolt ons with a rsx-s and a hondata chip... is just sick... ive never seen a n/a car respond so well to boltons... but gsr's are old school... and in itself makes it a badass ride.
Originally Posted by Minami Kotaro
Racing from a roll is most definitely not a driver's race. Once the car is moving, all you have to do is not miss a shift.
Even from a roll, there's still some skill involved keeping the car under control and the wheels from spinning.
Originally Posted by GSRGuy17
Half a second? Good lord man. More like 2 or 3 tenths at most.
i've seen a stock RSX-S pull a 15.1 stock so far.. my friend ran a 15.28 stock RSX-S... i've only seen for a stock GSR pull best at 15.6.
[QUOTE=yellow civic ex]I dunno, there's still that traction issue. With a fwd car, traction is an issue, even from a roll, and you gotta fight to keep it on the street. Do you have any idea how much torque steer there is and how easy it is to lose traction from a 45mph roll with any decent amount of power???
I'm not trying to insult anybody or anything, but personaly I have a hard time with the fact that the terms FWD and "Sports Car" have ever become related. Mind you, RWD cars depending on their make sure aren't perfect but RWD is the ticket for racing and high horsepower applications. I don't understand why sport compact cars have not gone with RWD and continue to push the biggest contradiction in automotive history when it comes to racing/agressive driving: putting the traction wheels on the end of the car that lifts under acceleration. The only things I like FWD for are in the rain and in the snow if it is an all season vehicle because in those cases the handling is better.
I'm not trying to insult anybody or anything, but personaly I have a hard time with the fact that the terms FWD and "Sports Car" have ever become related. Mind you, RWD cars depending on their make sure aren't perfect but RWD is the ticket for racing and high horsepower applications. I don't understand why sport compact cars have not gone with RWD and continue to push the biggest contradiction in automotive history when it comes to racing/agressive driving: putting the traction wheels on the end of the car that lifts under acceleration. The only things I like FWD for are in the rain and in the snow if it is an all season vehicle because in those cases the handling is better.


