Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

wtf is iran thinking?

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 29, 2007 | 05:07 PM
  #61  
F22B Prelude's Avatar
F22B Prelude
Rachel Bilson
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,230
Likes: 0
From: South Bend/Walkerton, Ind
Default

Yeah Iraq was a huge mistake.....I could deal with Afghanistan, but now we're in too deep
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2007 | 05:09 PM
  #62  
Snoopy's Avatar
Snoopy
been there done that
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 30,637
Likes: 0
From: 916
Default

let's blow up tehran i say :crazyr:
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2007 | 07:16 PM
  #63  
RB26DETT's Avatar
RB26DETT
Eagles > NFL
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,225
Likes: 0
From: nj
Default

Originally Posted by Tark
The UK is a little fucked right now, they can't just go in and safe the troops. They have to try to resolve this situation peacefully. Yet they do not want to have diplomatic discussion about this with Iran. What the fuck are the UK thinking?!? do they really want to start a military conflict over this? is it not possible that the ship was infact in Iranian Teritory(before beying forced).

Iranians are so confidant about this that it's a little scary dont you think?
Originally Posted by Tark
That would be too big of a bluff to gamble IMO.

How come the UK dont just sit and talk, doesn't mean they are admiting to wrong doing.
Originally Posted by Tark
i know that, but the UK needs to sit down with them... I dont think the UK is in a position to start an other war. i dont think the want to either.
Originally Posted by Tark
Not citizens soldiers...

and they have unfortunatly power from the people persuation of the people unfortunatly.

ANd BS in the sence that its not clear cut borders and guidelines.
soldiers can't be citizens?
I think the western world is showing more than enough patience. Tehran still stands.

I'm so glad Tark doesn't run things in this world.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2007 | 07:24 PM
  #64  
Tark's Avatar
Tark
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 30,331
Likes: 0
From: Montréal, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by RB26DETT
soldiers can't be citizens?
I think the western world is showing more than enough patience. Tehran still stands.

I'm so glad Tark doesn't run things in this world.
yeah i got citizen and civilian mixed

and i am glad every one who said just go to war with iran doesnt run the world...
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2007 | 07:38 PM
  #65  
RB26DETT's Avatar
RB26DETT
Eagles > NFL
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,225
Likes: 0
From: nj
Default

Originally Posted by Tark
yeah i got citizen and civilian mixed

and i am glad every one who said just go to war with iran doesnt run the world...
Iran kidnaps UK soldiers and Iran demands concessions from the UK. I'm pretty sure the UK also has a policy of non-negotiation with terrorists, kidnappers, etc. If the UK shows that kidnapping can bring the UK to the discussion table, its justifying kidnapping soldiers as a valid political strategy instead of an act of war.

Just because you're sitting all comfy and cozy up in Canada does not mean that you're not also in danger here.

Right now, I'd be sending missle strikes to their military installations, especially their SA-21s, and special ops to extract the British and take out the Ayatollah. Too bad the CIA isn't allowed to assassinate anymore :wtc:.

Not that I want war, but I can't wait until Israel loses its temper and patience. Unlike the United States, Israel does not do anything half-assed.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2007 | 07:45 PM
  #66  
hitman619's Avatar
hitman619
SDSU Basketball
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,483
Likes: 0
From: Diego
Default

if the uk really wanted the troops back

why don't they just send (Jesse Jackson) over to get them :dunno:

ftw
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 12:11 AM
  #67  
Kestrel's Avatar
Kestrel
Push to shock!
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Default

Originally Posted by dubcac
Werd. I'm sure that even IF, IF the Brits were in Iranian waters, the Iranians didn't give them any kind of warning or a chance to leave...they just captured them.
If the British were Iranian waters, they are not obligated to give warships any warnings. The US Coast Guard boards ships all the time, and at any time they can seize the ship (especially if it's one flying under the flag of an enemy nation), not to even mention warships. Neither side has really definitively (nor can they really) prove who was where, and clearly, neither is going to convince the other, so this is all moot at this point.

Originally Posted by rebeld
iran refuses to understand the simple concept of comprimise
The British aren't exactly compromising either (at least not at this point). They want everyone back with no concessions. Ultimately, though, there will be concessions from both sides because neither side really wants to see this escalate.

Originally Posted by Epoch
:rofl: The corn used in making ethanol corn is feedstock. Basically not consumable by humans.

Biofuel is a good first step, especially if we can reduce the farming impacts caused by pesticide use (We don't have to make ethanol-bound corn look pretty for the consumers, thus HEAVILY reducing the amount of pesticides used)... But yeah, I'd really like to see this guy eat a handful of feedstock corn and keep his smile.
Not enough arable land in this country to supply energy and feed the population. Add on to that that without cycling of crops, the arable land will soon become unarable. 15% ethanol is a maybe, but we're still heavily relying on petroleum.

Originally Posted by Epoch
This time... Well, makes me hope that at least the SAS is on a little field trip to their backyard to set some things straight at the very least...
If the captives are in Tehran, then best of luck to them. Just like in 1979, there's no easy way into or out of Tehran. Plus, any mission wouldn't happen for months at least, as the SAS would need to gather intelligence, draw up a plan, and train for their scenario.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 12:17 AM
  #68  
Kestrel's Avatar
Kestrel
Push to shock!
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Default

Originally Posted by RB26DETT
Iran kidnaps UK soldiers and Iran demands concessions from the UK. I'm pretty sure the UK also has a policy of non-negotiation with terrorists, kidnappers, etc. If the UK shows that kidnapping can bring the UK to the discussion table, its justifying kidnapping soldiers as a valid political strategy instead of an act of war.

Just because you're sitting all comfy and cozy up in Canada does not mean that you're not also in danger here.

Right now, I'd be sending missle strikes to their military installations, especially their SA-21s, and special ops to extract the British and take out the Ayatollah. Too bad the CIA isn't allowed to assassinate anymore :wtc:.

Not that I want war, but I can't wait until Israel loses its temper and patience. Unlike the United States, Israel does not do anything half-assed.
You can't really say the Iranian government is a bunch of terrorist. They may fund terrorists, they may be crazy, but they are a sovereign nation, and playing devils advocate, if the British were in Iranian waters, the Iranian have not kidnapped, but detained citizens of another country. No different than US Coast Guard detaining Cubans in Florida.

Striking now is the exact wrong thing to do. This story gives the extremists power and airtime. You start blowing up stuff in Iran, and the extremist gain substatially more voice in the government making Iran more dangerous and unpredictable. What the British need to do is appeal to moderate factions to temper the extremists. Ultimately, that's what got the hostages out in 1979 and in 2004. Military action, especially so early in the game is more likely to get them all executed than save them.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 05:39 AM
  #69  
Tark's Avatar
Tark
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 30,331
Likes: 0
From: Montréal, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by RB26DETT
Iran kidnaps UK soldiers and Iran demands concessions from the UK. I'm pretty sure the UK also has a policy of non-negotiation with terrorists, kidnappers, etc. If the UK shows that kidnapping can bring the UK to the discussion table, its justifying kidnapping soldiers as a valid political strategy instead of an act of war.

Just because you're sitting all comfy and cozy up in Canada does not mean that you're not also in danger here.

Right now, I'd be sending missle strikes to their military installations, especially their SA-21s, and special ops to extract the British and take out the Ayatollah. Too bad the CIA isn't allowed to assassinate anymore :wtc:.

Not that I want war, but I can't wait until Israel loses its temper and patience. Unlike the United States, Israel does not do anything half-assed.
If the vesel was in Iranian waters then they have a right to detain these soldiers. I know it sucks but it's true. How does detaining UK soldiers that tresspasses in iranian water be a act of war? (keep in mind that we dont know what heppened)

I dont think i ever said that i felt safe here in Canada... We are talking about the British here.

And for the rest of your :blah: :blah: who the fuck feels safe? you are saying you can't wait till a war break out in the middle east and accuse me of having a false sense of safety? I dont think you understand the impact of israel getting involved in this situation....
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:37 PM.