New DUI law in Ohio
I can deffinatly see how it would work.. it's a visable negative mark.. and this society cares so much how they are percieved by other people...
Not to mention.. let's say someone who lost someone close to them thanks to a DWI driver sees an offender's car in the parking lot.. with that tag.. I'd bet money the driver comes out to a vandalized car.
But :down: to the family thing....
Not to mention.. let's say someone who lost someone close to them thanks to a DWI driver sees an offender's car in the parking lot.. with that tag.. I'd bet money the driver comes out to a vandalized car.
But :down: to the family thing....
i live in ohio, and it is gay. my winter beater ( a 91 lumina) is at 200 for only liability because my mom had a dui. i get to drive the civ in the spring..... the insurance company drops the dui in may
Originally posted by NorCal DC4
A wise man once said, "When you have them by the balls, their hearts and minds will follow".
.
A wise man once said, "When you have them by the balls, their hearts and minds will follow".
.
isnt it " they can keep their hearts and minds sir, we have got them by the balls"
from the Last Castle?
Originally posted by NorCal DC4
It's The Scarlet Letter - LITERALLY - freshened for the 21st century!
I fail to see how this is an effective deterrent to drunk driving. I'd be in favor of mandatory driving suspensions lasting at least one year, without any exceptions.
It's The Scarlet Letter - LITERALLY - freshened for the 21st century!
I fail to see how this is an effective deterrent to drunk driving. I'd be in favor of mandatory driving suspensions lasting at least one year, without any exceptions.
get caught for a second dui and you'll know what it's like in CA.
it's actually worse than 1 year in CA.
__________________
'00 Dakar Bus CRS Edition
LCD Squad #0001
'00 Dakar Bus CRS Edition
LCD Squad #0001
Originally Posted by WiLL
...I really wanna get out and shoot people.
Originally posted by Spood
As for the law...
The reasoning is sound. One of the things most likely to deter would-be offenders is associations with social institutions, i.e. church, work, organizations, and family . Meaning, many people are much more likely to avoid getting in trouble for fear of hurting or disappointing someone close, like family. It's not like they're taking away the family's driving privledges, and it's only temporary.
As for the law...
The reasoning is sound. One of the things most likely to deter would-be offenders is associations with social institutions, i.e. church, work, organizations, and family . Meaning, many people are much more likely to avoid getting in trouble for fear of hurting or disappointing someone close, like family. It's not like they're taking away the family's driving privledges, and it's only temporary.
Originally posted by NorCal DC4
It's The Scarlet Letter - LITERALLY - freshened for the 21st century!
I fail to see how this is an effective deterrent to drunk driving. I'd be in favor of mandatory driving suspensions lasting at least one year, without any exceptions.
It's The Scarlet Letter - LITERALLY - freshened for the 21st century!
I fail to see how this is an effective deterrent to drunk driving. I'd be in favor of mandatory driving suspensions lasting at least one year, without any exceptions.


