:werd:

or a DSM :ugh:

 

This is going to be another "Turbo vs Na" argument.

Where the argument will go no where, to each their own.

 

I am not gonna get a mustang or a eclipse peace of junk i already have my civic and i bought it because it is so upgradable. Besides my friends have those cars and they are so slow. My old neon with a auto and no upgrades almost took a gt with all bolt on's the 96 version. So i think i will stay with my civic thanks

 

:bs:

 

i'll second that

 

well ya my neon was a 2001 and his gt had 130,000 on it but still i almost took it in the quarter mile from dead start. He maybe had a car length ahead of me but i thought i did good considering i was driving a neon with the 3 speed auto and i keep up pretty good to the 5 speed stang:madfawk:

 

cept mines a 96

 

thank you for the good laugh... :thumbup:

its funny you owned a neon but are talking shit on a mustang and dsm.. thats ****ing hilarious.. hears a fact for you.. (since you are talking about drag racing) you can dump ANY money into your civic, or neon.. dump that same amount into a mustang and the mustang will RAPE the civic or neon OVER AND OVER AND OVER again... lets face it.. a neon, AND a civic are econobox's.. NOT really geared towards performance.. so we as tuners are at a SEVERE disadvantage.. i will say it again.. civic + perfomance = expensive.. there is NO way around it.

 

b18b turbo, or b18c5 swap in a civic?

 

I'd do the c5, but thats just me.

turbo makes an otherwise very reliable and long lasting engine not so.