Notices

Scraping...!..?

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 15, 2003 | 02:01 PM
  #31  
CivicSiRacer's Avatar
CivicSiRacer
Honorary Moderator Alumni
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 8,735
Likes: 0
From: Someplace with cones=AUTO
Default

Originally posted by vitveet
Nice response...
And no, I haven't been on wheels larger than 16-17's on a civic but (IS300=19's=no slowdown).
All I want to know is will 215/35/19's rub with a 2.5" drop??
Thanks,
V.
If you don't like the truth then you shouldn't be on the forums. Haven't we been through this before in another thread? The IS300s have a whole lot more torque than a Civic.

Let's see:
1992-1995 Civic Si hb has about 125hp and 107ft/lbs of torque
2001 IS300 has 215 bhp Torque: 218 lb-ft
even the 1999-2000 Civic Si has 160hp and 111 ft/lbs of torque

Can't you see that? Or do we have to go around in circles over and over? 80 more hp and 111 more ft/lbs of torque.

So you mean to tell me if you put 19s on a IS300 and 19s on a Geo Metro both of them will not be affected by the heavy ass 19s? So tell me will putting 24" wheels/tires on your IS300 and then on a Dodge Viper RT/10 both cars will not be affected by the 24" wheels/tires?

WAKE UP! SHEESH!

But yes without rolling the fenders and/or modifying the fenders you will rub with 215/35x19" wheels and tires.
__________________
Sponsored by: KAM Racing Sports, Falken Tires, Progress Technology, Brady's High Performance, Taggart Performance Engineering, Rotora Brakes
Autocross is: 90% driver, 5% car, & 5% CRAZY MOJO!
Autocross Help Page
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2003 | 08:07 PM
  #32  
vitveet's Avatar
vitveet
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
Default

Originally posted by CivicSiRacer
If you don't like the truth then you shouldn't be on the forums. Haven't we been through this before in another thread? The IS300s have a whole lot more torque than a Civic.

Let's see:
1992-1995 Civic Si hb has about 125hp and 107ft/lbs of torque
2001 IS300 has 215 bhp Torque: 218 lb-ft
even the 1999-2000 Civic Si has 160hp and 111 ft/lbs of torque

Can't you see that? Or do we have to go around in circles over and over? 80 more hp and 111 more ft/lbs of torque.

So you mean to tell me if you put 19s on a IS300 and 19s on a Geo Metro both of them will not be affected by the heavy ass 19s? So tell me will putting 24" wheels/tires on your IS300 and then on a Dodge Viper RT/10 both cars will not be affected by the 24" wheels/tires?

WAKE UP! SHEESH!

But yes without rolling the fenders and/or modifying the fenders you will rub with 215/35x19" wheels and tires.
Nice response again...
Thanks for the last sentence though.
BTW, that was two horriable comparisions with the IS300 and the Metro. I understand what you're saying but the civic and IS330 are much more compariable than the IS300 and the Metro. Also that 24" wheels/tires wasn't to helpful either.
CivicSiRacer, I respect you and your post and I have to admit that you are very helpful, but don't get to sarcastic with it.
Post count doesn't mean much you know. I'm sure you know that though. Just b/c I haven't had much experience with this setup (215/35/19's on a 2000 civic EX dumped 2.5") doesn't mean I'm clueless; trust me, I'm not.
V.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2003 | 09:10 PM
  #33  
CivicSiRacer's Avatar
CivicSiRacer
Honorary Moderator Alumni
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 8,735
Likes: 0
From: Someplace with cones=AUTO
Default

Originally posted by vitveet
Nice response again...
Thanks for the last sentence though.
BTW, that was two horriable comparisions with the IS300 and the Metro. I understand what you're saying but the civic and IS330 are much more compariable than the IS300 and the Metro. Also that 24" wheels/tires wasn't to helpful either.
CivicSiRacer, I respect you and your post and I have to admit that you are very helpful, but don't get to sarcastic with it.
Post count doesn't mean much you know. I'm sure you know that though. Just b/c I haven't had much experience with this setup (215/35/19's on a 2000 civic EX dumped 2.5") doesn't mean I'm clueless; trust me, I'm not.
V.
I'm not being sacrastic I'm giving you the facts. It's just that you're on this IS300 kick. Torque has alot to do with how largea wheel you can run. Don't get me wrong if performance isn't your thing then get the largest wheels you can fit on your car.

Ask anyone in the SCCA/Speed Touring car series if they use 19s. They'd prolly laugh in your face. Ask all the drag racers who uses 19s. And then you should see what size wheels they ARE using.
__________________
Sponsored by: KAM Racing Sports, Falken Tires, Progress Technology, Brady's High Performance, Taggart Performance Engineering, Rotora Brakes
Autocross is: 90% driver, 5% car, & 5% CRAZY MOJO!
Autocross Help Page
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2003 | 01:41 PM
  #34  
GCEX's Avatar
GCEX
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by CivicSiRacer
Oh it wouldn't would it? I'm assuming you've never been on wheels larger than 16s or 17s. Believe me the rolling diameter is not even close to stock size anymore after 16s. 205/40x17" is like 1/4" taller. 215/35x18" is like 1/2" taller, and 215/35x19" is huge!

And yes 215/35x19" is large. You have to take into consideration the aspect ratio too.

But you sound like you want ot do it anyway so why ask? Just go ahead and get them.
185/65x14" stock versus the 205/40x17" I have now, the stock are actually bigger. I did the math a thousand times before and even have a spreadsheet set-up to calculate the rolling diameter of wheel/tire setups. The 205/40x17" is actually 2% smaller around than the 185/65x14".
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2003 | 04:00 PM
  #35  
CARLITO's Avatar
CARLITO
QUICKERSILV3R
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Arlington,TX
Default

EBP on white....h:


should go with stock or 16's I like the look of the stock Si rims


SO FRESH SO CLEAN
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2003 | 07:51 PM
  #36  
toadolson's Avatar
toadolson
The One And Only!!!
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: Abq, NM
Default

Originally posted by GCEX
185/65x14" stock versus the 205/40x17" I have now, the stock are actually bigger. I did the math a thousand times before and even have a spreadsheet set-up to calculate the rolling diameter of wheel/tire setups. The 205/40x17" is actually 2% smaller around than the 185/65x14".
I have to agree here.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2003 | 06:02 PM
  #37  
Gusto222's Avatar
Gusto222
Man WHORE
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: south-west, CT
Default

u shouldnt really have a prob rubbing w/ 17z-- i yusta have a (f)3.25"/(r)3.5" drop & 17" focalz w/a 45series tire & i Neva had a rubbing problem...

I drove my car really hard all tha time too-- i had tokico whitez -- although w/ in 6months i managed to Blow out all tha shockz...
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2003 | 12:54 PM
  #38  
96cpe's Avatar
96cpe
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: greensburg, pa
Default

adjustable shocks..........kyb's cheep yet nice.
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:24 PM.