why dont we burn ethanol?
Originally posted by brtecson
I thought it would be more like the year 2050
I thought it would be more like the year 2050
AHHAHAHAHAHA
thats hilarious. are you kidding?
you dont seem to understand how imminent 2000 or so years is. that is a blink of an eye in terms of earth's history.
you ALSO have to remember that they can only estimate how much oil is left as we wouldn't really have any for sure idea considering its buried.
Originally posted by Morpheus
hydrogen is.
hydrogen is.
Originally posted by Shingoblade-GSR
Good question.
With the current rate of petroleum consumption and assuming the rate of new sources found is kept constant, we'll run out of petroleum in 2050 years.
Oh, and ethanol isn't "unlimited".
Shingo
Good question.
With the current rate of petroleum consumption and assuming the rate of new sources found is kept constant, we'll run out of petroleum in 2050 years.
Oh, and ethanol isn't "unlimited".
Shingo
we are honestly good up for fuel for about 200-300years
regarding ethenol use, it can damage the fuel systems of current cars
there are cars out there that can burn it, but the US government wont let them go pass minor production as it "hurts" the oil industry to do so
Originally posted by Fujiwara Takumi
yes but you can't just take a ziploc bag and grab it out of the air. it takes power to seperate it from the oxygen, and that's costly. its also predicted that leaking hydrogen machinery would damage the ozone layer, but the statistics on their theorys are so far off it's not even funny.
yes but you can't just take a ziploc bag and grab it out of the air. it takes power to seperate it from the oxygen, and that's costly. its also predicted that leaking hydrogen machinery would damage the ozone layer, but the statistics on their theorys are so far off it's not even funny.
Originally posted by Morpheus
But what if we coudl use nuclear power to seperate it. IT would be clean to produce and clean to burn.
But what if we coudl use nuclear power to seperate it. IT would be clean to produce and clean to burn.
you know that the loss of chernobyl still causes birth defects on our side of the world?
Originally posted by Fujiwara Takumi
the problem with nuclear power is you are still left with poisionous left overs that we have LITERALLY NOTHING to do with. there is NOTHING to do with the waste left from fission. The NRC has set rules prohibiting any further development of nuclear fission reactors. it would take an act of god to see another one built.
you know that the loss of chernobyl still causes birth defects on our side of the world?
the problem with nuclear power is you are still left with poisionous left overs that we have LITERALLY NOTHING to do with. there is NOTHING to do with the waste left from fission. The NRC has set rules prohibiting any further development of nuclear fission reactors. it would take an act of god to see another one built.
you know that the loss of chernobyl still causes birth defects on our side of the world?
Originally posted by Fujiwara Takumi
the problem with nuclear power is you are still left with poisionous left overs that we have LITERALLY NOTHING to do with. there is NOTHING to do with the waste left from fission. The NRC has set rules prohibiting any further development of nuclear fission reactors. it would take an act of god to see another one built.
you know that the loss of chernobyl still causes birth defects on our side of the world?
the problem with nuclear power is you are still left with poisionous left overs that we have LITERALLY NOTHING to do with. there is NOTHING to do with the waste left from fission. The NRC has set rules prohibiting any further development of nuclear fission reactors. it would take an act of god to see another one built.
you know that the loss of chernobyl still causes birth defects on our side of the world?
but the ****in UN bans nuclear detonations in space , I mean what will it hurt when a nuclear powered spaceship is going past mars?
Chysler turned one of the popular Town and Country minivan to a Soap fuel vehical. It was called the Town and Country natruim. I belevie they called the Natruim b/c of the nitrates, like in borax soap. But it was only a prototypeArticle
Originally posted by Fujiwara Takumi
you dont seem to understand how imminent 2000 or so years is. that is a blink of an eye in terms of earth's history.
you dont seem to understand how imminent 2000 or so years is. that is a blink of an eye in terms of earth's history.
Originally posted by Morpheus
I dont get why we just dont send the stuff up with space shuttles and blast it out of orbit.
I dont get why we just dont send the stuff up with space shuttles and blast it out of orbit.


