AOL hates white people!!!
Originally Posted by HAN Frodo
You've experienced white racism? Because thats what I mean.
And I'd like to point out, the whole ashy skin thing was pure ignorance. Calling someone a whitey because most likely you've been mistreated by white people is a response.
And I'd like to point out, the whole ashy skin thing was pure ignorance. Calling someone a whitey because most likely you've been mistreated by white people is a response.
Originally Posted by RB
and its not like the whole company saw and approved the article...it was probably a disgruntled or lazy editor that approved it.
h:
Originally Posted by HAN Frodo
AOL didn't write that article, they just allowed it to be on their site.
stop trying to think. it's not working for you.
Originally Posted by reno96teg
you tell me. in high school, a black guy wanted to kick my ass because, "yo, you white, right?" i never saw his face before, not to mention ever even did anything to him. sounds like racism to me.
Originally Posted by Bl@ck
a columnist who works for AOL wrote it and AOL published it. the columnist and his editor, both being a part of AOL, allowed this feces to be published. so how is AOL not responsible again?
stop trying to think. it's not working for you.
stop trying to think. it's not working for you.
Originally Posted by Tark
Dude now you are just arguing for the sake of it... when you call a black guy a nig**r it's only truly hurtful because of the history behind the word and the atrocities that happened in the pass. Factor in the real act (apart being called a nig**r once in a while) of discrimination that this person had to endure during his life, maybe not from you personally but from others who would also use this term.
The derogatory words used to describe a white person does not have that heritage, that pass related it. I have yet to see a act (physical apart from just being called whitey) of this "reverse racism".
I do also agree that sometimes the white man is accused a bit to anxiously of being racist. I didn't read the finger joke that everyone is talking about... so can't/wont comment on that.
The derogatory words used to describe a white person does not have that heritage, that pass related it. I have yet to see a act (physical apart from just being called whitey) of this "reverse racism".
I do also agree that sometimes the white man is accused a bit to anxiously of being racist. I didn't read the finger joke that everyone is talking about... so can't/wont comment on that.
You may think I am arguing for the sake of arguing, but I am not. I am arguing that the line of reasoning you are using is wrong and it is still an offensive term regardless of the history behind it, or lack thereof
__________________
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
Originally Posted by HAN Frodo
Still doesn't mean thats what AOL thinks of as a whole.
__________________
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
Originally Posted by HAN Frodo
Did he kick your ass?
that's irrelevant though. do you agree that that was racism?
Originally Posted by HAN Frodo
Still doesn't mean thats what AOL thinks of as a whole.
Originally Posted by Nightshade
It was published by those who worked for and represented the company, therefore it is AOLs responsibility since they as a company hired these people to represent them and make qualified decisions regarding content.
Originally Posted by HAN Frodo
Still doesn't mean thats what AOL thinks of as a whole.


