AOL hates white people!!!
Originally Posted by Nightshade
So honkie doesn't have the history nor does whitey that the other words do. I can appreciate that so this makes it ok for me to refer to someone as a "ching chong"...after all it doesn't have the history of hatred behind it.
You may think I am arguing for the sake of arguing, but I am not. I am arguing that the line of reasoning you are using is wrong and it is still an offensive term regardless of the history behind it, or lack thereof
You may think I am arguing for the sake of arguing, but I am not. I am arguing that the line of reasoning you are using is wrong and it is still an offensive term regardless of the history behind it, or lack thereof

Originally Posted by reno96teg
so what are you saying, tark? if someone calls me a fag, i can only be offended if i'm actually gay? :lmao: uhh, what?
Originally Posted by Civic2Scooby
listen to all these crackers raising a storm in here.
p.s. nothing against you Civic2Scooby it was just a good example
Originally Posted by Tark
If you can't see the difference then i pity you John. It's the same as if you had a friend whos kid died in a fire and you kept saying to him... "die in a fire"(even as a joking way) it's just unacceptable. however you could say that to me and it wouldn't even make me think about it. double standard? kinda, but just because it doesn't affect me the same way it affect your friend. The guy who is bitching about this... or even bl@ck is only bitching about it not because they feel offended. And lets not pretend it is...
If you can't see the similarities then I pity you
__________________
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
Originally Posted by Nightshade
There really is no difference between me calling a black person the "N" word and a black person calling me a cracker or a honky as the same inflection is there. It is meant as a put down and is based solely on race.
If you can't see the similarities then I pity you
If you can't see the similarities then I pity you

The same goes for using the word N-er to refer to a black guy and calling a Chinese guy ching-chong. Its not the same.
$.02
__________________
.
.
Originally Posted by b00gers
They might be similar...but they sure arent the same.
The same goes for using the word N-er to refer to a black guy and calling a Chinese guy ching-chong. Its not the same.
$.02
The same goes for using the word N-er to refer to a black guy and calling a Chinese guy ching-chong. Its not the same.
$.02
So if that is the case it must have racial overtones to it and easily read as a derogatory remark.
__________________
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."


