Answer this question...
Originally Posted by Lsos
Unfortunately, it does not.
I have heard answers to this airplane problem from physics professors, pilots, freaking NASA rocket engineers....fact is, no degree will help you answer this question. It's a simple question of a person's intelligence and ability to reason...not how many hours they spent in the classroom.
It seems that the more educated people are, the longer their explanations as to why it will not fly...with freaking coefficients of lift and drag and force vectors and shit. Hell, I'm surprised no one threw the theory of relativity in there to prove why it will not fly. Of course they then stand firm by this idea...after all, they are the ones with the degree so they must be right.
If there was one thing I learned in college, getting my degree in mechanical engineering, is that a degree has nothing to do with intelligence. Nothing.
The plane will fly.
I have heard answers to this airplane problem from physics professors, pilots, freaking NASA rocket engineers....fact is, no degree will help you answer this question. It's a simple question of a person's intelligence and ability to reason...not how many hours they spent in the classroom.
It seems that the more educated people are, the longer their explanations as to why it will not fly...with freaking coefficients of lift and drag and force vectors and shit. Hell, I'm surprised no one threw the theory of relativity in there to prove why it will not fly. Of course they then stand firm by this idea...after all, they are the ones with the degree so they must be right.
If there was one thing I learned in college, getting my degree in mechanical engineering, is that a degree has nothing to do with intelligence. Nothing.
The plane will fly.
in a perfect world, i think the people who say the plane will fly are correct. the conveyor is basically adding a retarding force on the forward motion of the plane. Its like trying to take off against more resistance. say... using a plane just lying on its belly. lots of friction, but i suppose it could get going fast enough to take off. however, practically speaking, the engines on a real jet could doubtfully produce enough thrust to counteract the backwards pull of the conveyor AND still get the plane up to speed goin' forward.
i win.
h:
i win.
h:
Originally Posted by Lsos
Unfortunately, it does not.
I have heard answers to this airplane problem from physics professors, pilots, freaking NASA rocket engineers....fact is, no degree will help you answer this question. It's a simple question of a person's intelligence and ability to reason...not how many hours they spent in the classroom.
It seems that the more educated people are, the longer their explanations as to why it will not fly...with freaking coefficients of lift and drag and force vectors and shit. Hell, I'm surprised no one threw the theory of relativity in there to prove why it will not fly. Of course they then stand firm by this idea...after all, they are the ones with the degree so they must be right.
If there was one thing I learned in college, getting my degree in mechanical engineering, is that a degree has nothing to do with intelligence. Nothing.
The plane will fly.
I have heard answers to this airplane problem from physics professors, pilots, freaking NASA rocket engineers....fact is, no degree will help you answer this question. It's a simple question of a person's intelligence and ability to reason...not how many hours they spent in the classroom.
It seems that the more educated people are, the longer their explanations as to why it will not fly...with freaking coefficients of lift and drag and force vectors and shit. Hell, I'm surprised no one threw the theory of relativity in there to prove why it will not fly. Of course they then stand firm by this idea...after all, they are the ones with the degree so they must be right.
If there was one thing I learned in college, getting my degree in mechanical engineering, is that a degree has nothing to do with intelligence. Nothing.
The plane will fly.
The answer should be put on the original post.
The plane will fly, and it will take off using just as much runway space as it would without the conveyer belt (minus the wheel friction). This is because the turbines thrust the plane foward, not the wheels. It uses the same concept if you think of the plane being hung on a zipline by two cables, one at the front and one at the rear. The plane will still move foward along the zipline because the turbines move the plane, not the wheels. So even though the conveyer belt is "keeping up" with the speed of the wheels turning, it will still move along the conveyer belt and take off.
I know it has been answered already.. but i had to
The plane will fly, and it will take off using just as much runway space as it would without the conveyer belt (minus the wheel friction). This is because the turbines thrust the plane foward, not the wheels. It uses the same concept if you think of the plane being hung on a zipline by two cables, one at the front and one at the rear. The plane will still move foward along the zipline because the turbines move the plane, not the wheels. So even though the conveyer belt is "keeping up" with the speed of the wheels turning, it will still move along the conveyer belt and take off.
I know it has been answered already.. but i had to
Originally Posted by eonsx311
i honestly dont really think that it is possible. dont you think that would be a valuable and useful piece of technology seeing it would save alot of space at airports with limited runway area and high flight volumes?
h:
__________________
.
.
Originally Posted by REZNEFFIX
Well you must be intelligent enough to figure out that without intelligence you cannot figure out stuff like that. Why dont you ask a person with zero IQ or downs syndrome if they can answer it. Dude I dont mean to offend you but I didn't post my answer to be a hotshot or get attention or try to sound cool. It sounds like I hurt your feelings by telling you that I got a degree in Mechanical Engineering. The problem in this post is merely a high school physics question so someone like you and me should know more than enough to answer the question. that was simply my point and i was trying to help. People dont submit their replies in posts to get an EGO BOOST. Have a nice day.
You think the plane won't take off because you assume it will remain stationary. Wrong assumption. Just because the conveyor is matching the speed of the plane doesn't mean it's keeping it from moving. The plane is freewheeling on the runway, and the conveyor has about as much effect on it as it would on a hovercraft for example...pretty much none.
In fact, according to the riddle the airplane HAS to be moving in order for the conveyor to move the other way.
Anyways, why do people want this thread locked? If it annoys them... perhaps they just shouldn't click on it?


