Answer this question...

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Jan 9, 2006 | 12:49 PM

#221

Singhg83

BALLIN'

Joined: Dec 2002

Posts: 11,377

Likes: 0

From: Northern Virginia

:lmao: :rofl: @ e3nine

Jan 9, 2006 | 01:01 PM

#222

eonsx311

today is not my birthday.

Joined: Apr 2005

Posts: 3,035

Likes: 0

From: Massachusetts

no wind = no lift = no take off.

Jan 9, 2006 | 01:04 PM

#223

reno96teg

Moderator

Joined: Dec 2000

Posts: 21,573

Likes: 0

you fewls.. it will take off. this has already been covered.

Jan 9, 2006 | 01:10 PM

#224

eonsx311

today is not my birthday.

Joined: Apr 2005

Posts: 3,035

Likes: 0

From: Massachusetts

Quote:

Originally Posted by VPUPPY

I retract my earlier statement and now say the play will fly. The trust from the engines is what will move the plane foward even thought its on a conveyor. The engines will move the fluid around it, the air, and be able to move the plane forward. If you doubt this is the case, take a look at howstuffworks.com and look up jet engines.

think about running on a treadmill, do you feel any wind in your face? that plane would just make a whole shit load of noise and thats all.

Jan 9, 2006 | 01:13 PM

#225

eonsx311

today is not my birthday.

Joined: Apr 2005

Posts: 3,035

Likes: 0

From: Massachusetts

Quote:

Originally Posted by reno96teg

you fewls.. it will take off. this has already been covered.

i honestly dont really think that it is possible. dont you think that would be a valuable and useful piece of technology seeing it would save alot of space?

Jan 9, 2006 | 01:14 PM

#226

eonsx311

today is not my birthday.

Joined: Apr 2005

Posts: 3,035

Likes: 0

From: Massachusetts

Quote:

Originally Posted by reno96teg

you fewls.. it will take off. this has already been covered.

i honestly dont really think that it is possible. dont you think that would be a valuable and useful piece of technology seeing it would save alot of space at airports with limited runway area and high flight volumes?

Jan 9, 2006 | 01:31 PM

#227

M@rshy

٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶

Joined: Aug 2004

Posts: 21,807

Likes: 0

Hey guys. Shut the fuck up. Nobody cares anymore. This has gone on too long. No matter what there will always be some dumbass saying the opposite of the correct answer, even if it was proven. Just let it die already....AGAIN...
Damn newbs..

Jan 9, 2006 | 01:45 PM

#228

eonsx311

today is not my birthday.

Joined: Apr 2005

Posts: 3,035

Likes: 0

From: Massachusetts

Quote:

Originally Posted by MarshyTheKid

i don't mean to be argumentitive but i would need more proof than that article to convince me an airplane could take off without any lift.

Jan 9, 2006 | 02:20 PM

#229

reno96teg

Moderator

Joined: Dec 2000

Posts: 21,573

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by eonsx311

think about running on a treadmill, do you feel any wind in your face? that plane would just make a whole shit load of noise and thats all.

the difference being that the plane isn't propelled by the wheels. its propelled by the turbine engines/propellers/whatever. therein lies your answer.

Jan 9, 2006 | 02:40 PM

#230

Red X

x pǝɹ

Joined: Feb 2003

Posts: 6,246

Likes: 1

From: Upstate

Quote:

Originally Posted by eonsx311

Im not sure you realize the time and machinery that would be required for such a runway, plus airports would be very stranded if these runways broke. Nothing beats good ol' empty space.

Also it would take longer for a plane to take off.

Reply Share

First
Prev
23 / 31
Next
Last

Forum Jump