Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Answer this question...

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 12, 2005 | 01:32 PM
  #201  
M@rshy's Avatar
M@rshy
٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 21,807
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by OLDMAN
If this would work why would they bother making runways as long as they do? They could use the same technology to land as well.

But my 8 reindeer only need a rooftop to land and take off, so what do I know.

Sorry to revive a deadish thread but....

If the plane can take off, does it take off in a shorter distance or what? If it does, why doesn't the military use this to their advantage?
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2005 | 01:34 PM
  #202  
Kestrel's Avatar
Kestrel
Push to shock!
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Default

Originally Posted by MarshyTheKid
Sorry to revive a deadish thread but....

If the plane can take off, does it take off in a shorter distance or what? If it does, why doesn't the military use this to their advantage?
No. It should be similar or slightly longer distance.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2005 | 01:38 PM
  #203  
M@rshy's Avatar
M@rshy
٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 21,807
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Kestrel
No. It should be similar or slightly longer distance.
Oh. Darn it...

I am suprised that the military doesn't use sling shots for planes. They only use them on aircraft carriors, I think.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2005 | 02:20 PM
  #204  
Kestrel's Avatar
Kestrel
Push to shock!
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Default

Originally Posted by MarshyTheKid
Oh. Darn it...

I am suprised that the military doesn't use sling shots for planes. They only use them on aircraft carriors, I think.
Pretty much. It's not practical...the pneumatic driven system on a carrier requires a boiler to create the steam, and then you need the rails and stuff in the ground to actually make it work. Not to mention the amount of stress on airframes and landing gear that are launched off decks....
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2005 | 06:18 PM
  #205  
b00gers's Avatar
b00gers
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 58,579
Likes: 0
From: Lll
Default

Originally Posted by MarshyTheKid
Oh. Darn it...

I am suprised that the military doesn't use sling shots for planes. They only use them on aircraft carriors, I think.
They do use sling shots on the aircraft carriers. h:
__________________
.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 08:52 AM
  #206  
Lsos's Avatar
Lsos
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach
Default

I see everyone finally agreed that the airplane will take off because it's not powered by its wheels...but they still seem to have missed the point. Fact is, even a car powered by its wheels would be able to make progress down the conveyor. The only difference is that its engine would have to work twice as hard becasue it has to compensate for the conveyor, where as the airplane doesn't.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 09:18 AM
  #207  
kento's Avatar
kento
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,759
Likes: 0
From: DFW Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Lsos
I see everyone finally agreed that the airplane will take off because it's not powered by its wheels...but they still seem to have missed the point. Fact is, even a car powered by its wheels would be able to make progress down the conveyor. The only difference is that its engine would have to work twice as hard becasue it has to compensate for the conveyor, where as the airplane doesn't.
you're dumb.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 09:45 AM
  #208  
Lsos's Avatar
Lsos
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach
Default

Originally Posted by kento
you're dumb.
Since I'm dumb I probably wouldn't understand, but would you care to explain to everyone else how you arrived at this conclusion?
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 10:10 AM
  #209  
reno96teg's Avatar
reno96teg
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 21,573
Likes: 0
Default

yes, it will take off. the engines will pull the jet along via suction. that's where you get the thrust, not on the tarmac.

the only difference between being on the conveyor vs. tarmac is that the wheels will be spinning faster.

edit > 5 pages? was this already resolved?
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 10:16 AM
  #210  
M@rshy's Avatar
M@rshy
٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 21,807
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Lsos
I see everyone finally agreed that the airplane will take off because it's not powered by its wheels...but they still seem to have missed the point. Fact is, even a car powered by its wheels would be able to make progress down the conveyor. The only difference is that its engine would have to work twice as hard becasue it has to compensate for the conveyor, where as the airplane doesn't.
You lose... If the car is accelerating and the belt has a sensor to speed up at the same rate as the car, matching speed for speed no matter what, the car won't go anywhere.


If the belt had a set speed or was a little behind in the matching, then yes slowly the car would move off the belt, until the car hit its top speed, thus giving the belt a chance to match.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:07 AM.