Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Bush signs energy bill

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 11:06 AM
  #21  
DVPGSR's Avatar
DVPGSR
I need sleep...
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
From: NH
Default

People are talking as if Bush wrote the legislation by himself and signed it into law without any of the "checks & balances" our government has in place. The fact is that this bill was written by "OUR" Congressmen and Senators, voted on by both legislative bodies, and sent to President Bush for approval. This bill is so laden with pork (like any bill is not) it is rediculous, although not as bad as the transportation bill just signed. There is something in there to make everyone happy. From ethenol subsidies made from the corn in Iowa to sugar can subsidies for people in Hawaii and Florida. Just something for our respective legislators to come home and say, "Look what I did for you!"

There are some good things in here, but just because Bush signed it does not mean he is solely responsible for all of the content contained within.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 05:57 PM
  #22  
Nightshade's Avatar
Nightshade
Thread Starter
un-Touch'd krew
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 51,774
Likes: 1
From: My own level of hell
Default

Originally Posted by DVPGSR
People are talking as if Bush wrote the legislation by himself and signed it into law without any of the "checks & balances" our government has in place. The fact is that this bill was written by "OUR" Congressmen and Senators, voted on by both legislative bodies, and sent to President Bush for approval. This bill is so laden with pork (like any bill is not) it is rediculous, although not as bad as the transportation bill just signed. There is something in there to make everyone happy. From ethenol subsidies made from the corn in Iowa to sugar can subsidies for people in Hawaii and Florida. Just something for our respective legislators to come home and say, "Look what I did for you!"

There are some good things in here, but just because Bush signed it does not mean he is solely responsible for all of the content contained within.
Amd you act as though if he actually read the bill he couldn't have seen past the filler and realized it really isn't as good a bill as it appears on the surface and would have vetoed it until the corrections had been made.

He does have executive power and even though it isn't used very often there are times when it should be called into play for the better of the people and not just for the better of corporations.
__________________
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 06:18 PM
  #23  
JoshJ's Avatar
JoshJ
bang bang.
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 0
From: Hilliard, OH
Default

so when's gas prices going down? thats all i care about
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 05:03 AM
  #24  
DVPGSR's Avatar
DVPGSR
I need sleep...
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by Nightshade
Amd you act as though if he actually read the bill he couldn't have seen past the filler and realized it really isn't as good a bill as it appears on the surface and would have vetoed it until the corrections had been made.

He does have executive power and even though it isn't used very often there are times when it should be called into play for the better of the people and not just for the better of corporations.
Yes the President can veto a bill, however if any President vetoed every bill that was loaded with pork than nothing will get passed. Besides if the President vetoes a bill that passes the House and Senate by large majorities it only gets sent back to them and they can vote to overide the veto. And when Congressmen and Senators get to bring big packages of aid and money back to their constituents do you really think that was going to happen?
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 05:39 AM
  #25  
BonzoAPD's Avatar
BonzoAPD
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 16,353
Likes: 0
From: Ossining, New York
Default

Originally Posted by Nightshade
Amd you act as though if he actually read the bill he couldn't have seen past the filler and realized it really isn't as good a bill as it appears on the surface and would have vetoed it until the corrections had been made.

He does have executive power and even though it isn't used very often there are times when it should be called into play for the better of the people and not just for the better of corporations.

John if he would have vetoed it I would bet you would be bitching as well. Saying that he does nothing for the enviornment and that he wouldn't even sign this energy bill which would have atleast been a step in the right direction. People like you who blindly hate Bush complain about everything he does
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:32 PM.