Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

"Critical Flaw Found in Firefox"

Thread Tools
 
Old May 9, 2005 | 01:32 PM
  #31  
Grifter's Avatar
Grifter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 44,835
Likes: 0
From: the southwest
Default

Fix a memory leak in Firefox 1.0
Firefox is supposed to dynamically release memory from its RAM cache to other Windows applications as needed. Unfortunately, Firefox 1.0 seems to consume more memory than it should, which hurts performance, when set to the default of 51200 KB (51 MB).

To solve this, Firefox power users recommend limiting the memory cache using the Configuration Console. This frees up memory for other apps, speeding up everything to a greater or a lesser extent, depending on your machine and the applications you run. Here's how the trick works:

Step 1. Type about:config into Firefox's Address Bar and press Enter.

Step 2. Right-click any row, then click New, Integer. Type or paste the following preference name into the dialog box that appears (this is a hidden preference that doesn't exist in the Configuration Console until you create it):

browser.cache.memory.capacity

Step 3. Click OK, then enter the following integer number into the next dialog box, representing 16 MB of RAM for the cache:

16000

Step 4. Click OK to close the dialog box, then close all instances of Firefox and restart it.

For a lengthy discussion of this option, see Mozillazine's forum topic 172041.

http://windowssecrets.com/041202/#top1
Reply
Old May 9, 2005 | 01:35 PM
  #32  
qtiger's Avatar
qtiger
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,776
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Qbacca
In the last 5 months, there are more Secunia advisories for Firefox than IE.

Let me correct myself, I think I understated things.



Firefox has double the security advisories for the last 5 months (all of 2005).

And that's with a third of IE's market share.

Last edited by Qbacca; May 9, 2005 at 01:37 PM.
Reply
Old May 9, 2005 | 01:38 PM
  #33  
mayonaise's Avatar
mayonaise
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,181
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Qbacca
In the last 5 months, there are more Secunia advisories for Firefox than IE.
in the last 6 months, there are more Secunia advisories for IE than Firefox.

Attached Images
File Type: png
ffsecunia.com.png (14.4 KB, 130 views)
File Type: png
secunia.com.png (14.8 KB, 129 views)
Reply
Old May 9, 2005 | 01:41 PM
  #34  
Misa's Avatar
Misa
Pic Whore
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 22,224
Likes: 1
From: NJ
Default

IE6.x

Currently, 19 out of 80 Secunia advisories, is marked as "Unpatched" in the Secunia database.
Firefox 1.0
Currently, 5 out of 16 Secunia advisories, is marked as "Unpatched" in the Secunia database.
Reply
Old May 9, 2005 | 01:42 PM
  #35  
qtiger's Avatar
qtiger
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,776
Likes: 0
Default




IE has been out longer and thus has had more vulnerabilities over time. You have no argument.
Reply
Old May 9, 2005 | 01:42 PM
  #36  
DakarM's Avatar
DakarM
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 44,908
Likes: 0
From: Location Location
Default

Originally Posted by Darth Grifter
Fix a memory leak in Firefox 1.0
Firefox is supposed to dynamically release memory from its RAM cache to other Windows applications as needed. Unfortunately, Firefox 1.0 seems to consume more memory than it should, which hurts performance, when set to the default of 51200 KB (51 MB).

To solve this, Firefox power users recommend limiting the memory cache using the Configuration Console. This frees up memory for other apps, speeding up everything to a greater or a lesser extent, depending on your machine and the applications you run. Here's how the trick works:

Step 1. Type about:config into Firefox's Address Bar and press Enter.

Step 2. Right-click any row, then click New, Integer. Type or paste the following preference name into the dialog box that appears (this is a hidden preference that doesn't exist in the Configuration Console until you create it):

browser.cache.memory.capacity

Step 3. Click OK, then enter the following integer number into the next dialog box, representing 16 MB of RAM for the cache:

16000

Step 4. Click OK to close the dialog box, then close all instances of Firefox and restart it.

For a lengthy discussion of this option, see Mozillazine's forum topic 172041.

http://windowssecrets.com/041202/#top1

doesn't bother me too much at home as I have min. 2GB in each of my systems but at work only 256mbs so I will try the changes.
__________________
'00 Dakar Bus CRS Edition
LCD Squad #0001
Originally Posted by WiLL
...I really wanna get out and shoot people.
Reply
Old May 9, 2005 | 01:43 PM
  #37  
qtiger's Avatar
qtiger
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,776
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mayonaise
in the last 6 months, there are more Secunia advisories for IE than Firefox.

How long has firefox been out in the wild with a market share worth talking about? Hint: Not 6 months.
Reply
Old May 9, 2005 | 01:52 PM
  #38  
mayonaise's Avatar
mayonaise
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,181
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Qbacca
How long has firefox been out in the wild with a market share worth talking about? Hint: Not 6 months.
what does market share have to do with anything? haven't you realized that popularity is not connected to how vulnerable or secure a program is? :slap:

and i'm wondering where on earth you're getting that firefox has a third of the market compared to IE.
from may 2, 2005:
Janco reports that Firefox share in the broader market has surged past 10%.
http://www.webpronews.com/news/ebusi...illySites.html

lets see. at 1/3 the market share of IE, that would mean that IE has 30% market share :chuckles:
Originally Posted by Qbacca
IE has been out longer and thus has had more vulnerabilities over time. You have no argument.
then compare IE to the time that firefox has been out, and you have no argument
Reply
Old May 9, 2005 | 01:57 PM
  #39  
qtiger's Avatar
qtiger
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,776
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mayonaise
what does market share have to do with anything? haven't you realized that popularity is not connected to how vulnerable or secure a program is? :slap:
Why would anyone write exploits for an unpopular system?



When's the last time you saw a virus written for an Amiga?
Reply
Old May 9, 2005 | 01:58 PM
  #40  
reech-around's Avatar
reech-around
Thread Starter
RIP Woong.
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 17,284
Likes: 0
From: san jose, ca
Default

Originally Posted by Qbacca
When's the last time you saw a virus written for an Amiga?
LMAO :lmfao: !!!!
__________________
.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:53 PM.