Guy got fired due to unsafe user avatar
Originally Posted by Black2000GSR
nIt's the infamous, fine as **** cam girl
[Edit: Broken link removed. Even if the link's not broken, we already know that it's not a suitable image.]
[Edit: Broken link removed. Even if the link's not broken, we already know that it's not a suitable image.]
h:
The funniest thing about some of your replies is that if you were in the situation I'm sure that you'd be sitting there thinking "It's all my fault, I shouldn't blame the guy with the avatar, even though he violated the TOS. I can only blame myself." 
I don't think some of you think before you open your mouths (or type in this case).
IMHO, it's the mods fault for not sticking to the TOS. The kid with the avatar is next in line for violating the TOS and then the guy that got fired. There are not many of you that can honestly say you don't post at work or at school or somewhere where you should be doing something else and not posting here. Heck, I'm posting this message from work right now.
I trust that I'm protected by the TOS, fellow admins and all of you to follow the rules. I shouldn't have to hide avatars/sigs because everyone should be following the agreement that they checked off on when they signed up.
h:
*dismount soapbox*

I don't think some of you think before you open your mouths (or type in this case).
IMHO, it's the mods fault for not sticking to the TOS. The kid with the avatar is next in line for violating the TOS and then the guy that got fired. There are not many of you that can honestly say you don't post at work or at school or somewhere where you should be doing something else and not posting here. Heck, I'm posting this message from work right now.
I trust that I'm protected by the TOS, fellow admins and all of you to follow the rules. I shouldn't have to hide avatars/sigs because everyone should be following the agreement that they checked off on when they signed up.
h:*dismount soapbox*
Originally Posted by westcoaststyle
The funniest thing about some of your replies is that if you were in the situation I'm sure that you'd be sitting there thinking "It's all my fault, I shouldn't blame the guy with the avatar, even though he violated the TOS. I can only blame myself." 
I don't think some of you think before you open your mouths (or type in this case).
IMHO, it's the mods fault for not sticking to the TOS. The kid with the avatar is next in line for violating the TOS and then the guy that got fired. There are not many of you that can honestly say you don't post at work or at school or somewhere where you should be doing something else and not posting here. Heck, I'm posting this message from work right now.
I trust that I'm protected by the TOS, fellow admins and all of you to follow the rules. I shouldn't have to hide avatars/sigs because everyone should be following the agreement that they checked off on when they signed up.
h:
*dismount soapbox*

I don't think some of you think before you open your mouths (or type in this case).
IMHO, it's the mods fault for not sticking to the TOS. The kid with the avatar is next in line for violating the TOS and then the guy that got fired. There are not many of you that can honestly say you don't post at work or at school or somewhere where you should be doing something else and not posting here. Heck, I'm posting this message from work right now.
I trust that I'm protected by the TOS, fellow admins and all of you to follow the rules. I shouldn't have to hide avatars/sigs because everyone should be following the agreement that they checked off on when they signed up.
h:*dismount soapbox*

Originally Posted by Nightshade
Actually the precedent is not whether or not it actually is sexual harrasment but rather how it is perceived by the one claiming sexual harrasment. If the employer does not take action immediatley they can face legal repercussions from it and 9 times out of 10 the court will see it in favor of the plaintiff.
Screwed up but its how it is anymore.
Screwed up but its how it is anymore.


