US intervention of Global Affairs
What do you think? I think we shouldnt act as "global police" but concentrate more on our country before acting on others. Discuss, thanks.
I do believe we need to do things at home first. But when it comes to security issues posed by other countries, then we have no choice but to act as police. Being the most powerful country, we are the one everyone dis-likes, because they're jealous...And dont like what we stand for...In a world without order there is only chaos, we help bring order where there is none, thus helping save ourselves from being affected by their chaos...
Originally Posted by vassil3427
I do believe we need to do things at home first. But when it comes to security issues posed by other countries, then we have no choice but to act as police. Being the most powerful country, we are the one everyone dis-likes, because they're jealous...And dont like what we stand for...In a world without order there is only chaos, we help bring order where there is none, thus helping save ourselves from being affected by their chaos...
Just my guess...but if a certain country caused the blackout last summer I think there would be a lot buz about it. This is the first time I am hearing about this rumor and I don't think it holds a lot of truth to it. But whatever.
To stay on topic the US has to intervene in global affairs. Why? Because we are the biggest global economy today. Just look at all the goods we use or consume everyday and look for their country of origin. The US keeps a lot of countries economies afloat with the amount of aid that is given, corporations that have relocated there, and the number of goods they produce for us. The US is the worlds largest consumer.
With that said I think we do have a right to be the world's policeman. I think the UN has proven itself ineffective at providing this service, and until they do someone needs to step in and keep order.
To stay on topic the US has to intervene in global affairs. Why? Because we are the biggest global economy today. Just look at all the goods we use or consume everyday and look for their country of origin. The US keeps a lot of countries economies afloat with the amount of aid that is given, corporations that have relocated there, and the number of goods they produce for us. The US is the worlds largest consumer.
With that said I think we do have a right to be the world's policeman. I think the UN has proven itself ineffective at providing this service, and until they do someone needs to step in and keep order.
America as a nation is arguably the most powerful, but by no means should we play global police. Any country that believes in democracy, freedom, and justice for all should never make arbitrary decisions on a global scale, that can be saved for the world dictators of fiction. We need to have checks placed on our power to avoid becoming (more of) a world dictator and tyrant. America can (and perhaps will) conquer the world if gone unchecked, and I feel that giving one nation complete world power needs to be avoided at all costs or history books will one day talk about an allied force overthrowing a too power-hungry America.
Originally Posted by DVPGSR
Just my guess...but if a certain country caused the blackout last summer I think there would be a lot buz about it. This is the first time I am hearing about this rumor and I don't think it holds a lot of truth to it. But whatever.
I think the US should be involved in the world around it, after all we all live on this rock, so it all makes sense for us to try to make it better. The problem I see with being the world's policeman, especially if we are the sole policeman, is that suddenly we impose what we think is right and what we think is just on other countries and cultures. It's like a cop being able to just pull you over randomly cause he didn't like the fact you drive a modified Honda, even if it is perfectly legal, just different. In that case though, you can challenge it in court, try to argue the law. But in the case of the global policeman, who's going to challenge them? The laws are whatever the global policeman wants them to be. The US needs to work with other countries, not alone.
Originally Posted by Kestrel
I think the US should be involved in the world around it, after all we all live on this rock, so it all makes sense for us to try to make it better. The problem I see with being the world's policeman, especially if we are the sole policeman, is that suddenly we impose what we think is right and what we think is just on other countries and cultures. It's like a cop being able to just pull you over randomly cause he didn't like the fact you drive a modified Honda, even if it is perfectly legal, just different. In that case though, you can challenge it in court, try to argue the law. But in the case of the global policeman, who's going to challenge them? The laws are whatever the global policeman wants them to be. The US needs to work with other countries, not alone.
A little chin music
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,655
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Ohio - Rock 'n Roll capitol of the World
Hmmmm...... another county causing the blackout? :laugh: That's pretty funny, considering I live about 30 miles from WHERE IT STARTED! :slap: Anyway, the world needs a global police force. Because the world can't behave itself, and the only country with the capabilities and resources to be the mommy and daddy to all the delinquent children is the United States.


