2.0 or 2.2?
#11
i'd rather have the 2.2. the torque curve is alot better than the 2.0 model. ive driven both on tracks and the 2.2 feels better. i also like the redesign and the other improvements made to the suspension, aero parts, interior, etc on the 04+ models. also the 04+ models have more interior room which means alot to me because i'm 6'4"
#12
lots and lots of fail
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeetroit
Posts: 23,004
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by evolution
Sure you have two less tweeters, no glass window, carpet console but it's still hardcore 9k.
#13
Originally Posted by DeadZero
2.0 is the best with that extra 1k rpm id rather have the extra rpm then 15 hp anyday. And if ur goin to sup up the car then when u have the car runnin like 350 to the wheels ull be wanting that extra rpms.
uhhh..........i'd rather have the extra 15hp.
#14
Originally Posted by flyromeo3
uhhh..........i'd rather have the extra 15hp.
Now if it still had a 9k redline and the extra torque/hp with a cam redesign.. then it'd be :thumbup: x 2
#15
早晨好, 先生們!™ 粉腸+ 春袋
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Toronto
Posts: 8,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 98CoupeV6
The 02 has all of that stuff, that's why I think it's the best S2000 year out of them all Throw in the now-standard headrest speakers and it's a deal.
True, true. The glass window is the best. The plastic one is horrible when the top's up, so it's an excuse to keep the top down.
Crappy thing with the stereo is that if your top is down and you're at wot, you won't hear anything but the wailing engine rising to 9k.
#16
早晨好, 先生們!™ 粉腸+ 春袋
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Toronto
Posts: 8,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave-ROR
Same here. 9K redline is cool, no doubt, but I'd rather have usable power compared to the ability to point at the 9k redline.
Now if it still had a 9k redline and the extra torque/hp with a cam redesign.. then it'd be :thumbup: x 2
Now if it still had a 9k redline and the extra torque/hp with a cam redesign.. then it'd be :thumbup: x 2
#17
i think i like both about equally (AP1 vs. AP2)...but if i had to choose i think i would go with the AP2.
however, had i been able to find a low mileage '02 or '03 when i was looking last year and the price was right - i probably would have gotten the AP1...but that's not how it worked out for me.
standard audio sucks on ANY year S2k - and the headrest speakers are not standard -- at least not on any '05 that i have seen...
however, had i been able to find a low mileage '02 or '03 when i was looking last year and the price was right - i probably would have gotten the AP1...but that's not how it worked out for me.
standard audio sucks on ANY year S2k - and the headrest speakers are not standard -- at least not on any '05 that i have seen...
#18
lots and lots of fail
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeetroit
Posts: 23,004
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by jay3737
i think i like both about equally (AP1 vs. AP2)...but if i had to choose i think i would go with the AP2.
however, had i been able to find a low mileage '02 or '03 when i was looking last year and the price was right - i probably would have gotten the AP1...but that's not how it worked out for me.
standard audio sucks on ANY year S2k - and the headrest speakers are not standard -- at least not on any '05 that i have seen...
however, had i been able to find a low mileage '02 or '03 when i was looking last year and the price was right - i probably would have gotten the AP1...but that's not how it worked out for me.
standard audio sucks on ANY year S2k - and the headrest speakers are not standard -- at least not on any '05 that i have seen...