Notices
On Topic Serious discussion and debate. No nonsense will be tolerated.

http://www.dumpincumbents.com

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 05:49 AM
  #1  
reno96teg's Avatar
reno96teg
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 21,573
Likes: 0
Default http://www.dumpincumbents.com

http://www.dumpincumbents.com

i think it's a noble effort..
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 04:53 AM
  #2  
fjm1's Avatar
fjm1
G35
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: NW NJ
Default

Noble, yet misguided.

Increasing voter registration does not equate to cleaning house of incumbents.

Support for parties other than Democrat or Republican does.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 05:00 AM
  #3  
reno96teg's Avatar
reno96teg
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 21,573
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by fjm1
Increasing voter registration does not equate to cleaning house of incumbents.
truth. if you read his "dogma", you'll see that he wants voters educated as well.

3) All citizens must study the political messages of all available candidates other then the incumbents so that they can make an informed decision on election day. We must use the vast array of information available to us to understand what those running for office really stand for. We must engage in meaningful political conversations to understand issues rather then supporting incumbent ideology through labeling and name calling. Our incumbents are dependent upon uninformed voters and low voter turn out, they are reelected because voter turn-out rarely exceeds 40-45%.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 08:47 AM
  #4  
fjm1's Avatar
fjm1
G35
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: NW NJ
Default

agreed, yet voter education also does not equate to defeat of incumbents.

If voters are only presented with two choices even the most educated are still playing a "lesser of two evils" game.

I still absolutely applaud the effort. The more you know.......
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 10:26 AM
  #5  
reno96teg's Avatar
reno96teg
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 21,573
Likes: 0
Default

right, that's why informed voters need to flood the primaries..
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 11:00 AM
  #6  
fjm1's Avatar
fjm1
G35
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: NW NJ
Default

Originally Posted by reno96teg
right, that's why informed voters need to flood the primaries..
"Informed voters need to flood every primary!"

You've summed up, and improved upon, the above website in a single statement.

Let's assume the author behind the dump incumbents website is correct. "Informed" voters turn up in droves. Now the problem becomes what the masses believe. Aren't the "sheeple" still easily persuaded by big budget campaigns?

Now if folks could be convinced to vote for the person who spends the least on their campaign then we might be on to something....
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 12:42 PM
  #7  
DVPGSR's Avatar
DVPGSR
I need sleep...
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
From: NH
Default

We need to break down the barriers to entry for more parties. Of course those that will need to do that are from one of the existing two parties and we all know that will never happen.
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:38 PM.