2008 Lexus IS-F 500 spy shots
Agreed. Beat Lex to a two door version. Who cares if it eats into the Accord sales, in the end Honda still gets the money.
::sigh:: eight speed automatic? For true, Toyota?
I'm not interested anymore.
I mean... I really like the new IS. I like the interior, I love the way they drive... they even offer the two options I want - a real manual tranny (F1/SMG/DSG may be faster but they're not the same) and AWD, but they're only offered on the lowest model and they're not even offered together. Back to lusting after European models for me, I guess.
I'm not interested anymore.
I mean... I really like the new IS. I like the interior, I love the way they drive... they even offer the two options I want - a real manual tranny (F1/SMG/DSG may be faster but they're not the same) and AWD, but they're only offered on the lowest model and they're not even offered together. Back to lusting after European models for me, I guess.
The IS-F doesn't need as much torque as the LS460, since it's way lighter. Torque is only good for low-rev start up. As long as it's adequate, there is no advantage to overshoot it. From that point on, it's the horsepower that really counts.
a comparison:
an engine making 100ft-lbs up from 0-100rpm is just as useful as another engine making 200ft-lbs from 0-50rpm
the reason is GEARING. plus he is right, it makes no sense for an engine tuned for performance, using a similar design from the same company to have lesser torque than the smaller engine.
horsepower is basically just a idiots way of interpreting useful torque band. whats actually useful to know is the area under the torque curve marked off at each shiftpoint added together at the wheels.... but most people wouldn't understand what i just said, so don't feel too bad. horsepower in this day in age is about as useful as circular mils
Missing the point, dude. I don't care if DSG or SMG or whatever new manumatic the engineers can come up with shift faster/better/more efficiently, it just doesn't match the feel and control of shifter+clutch. Big reason I like cars is because I like to drive. I don't need the car driving me.
Missing the point, dude. I don't care if DSG or SMG or whatever new manumatic the engineers can come up with shift faster/better/more efficiently, it just doesn't match the feel and control of shifter+clutch. Big reason I like cars is because I like to drive. I don't need the car driving me.
they did this because they wanted 8-speeds. the 8-speed is going to make it much faster and probably much more fuel effcient than it's competitors, regardless of engine power output.
with the new rregulations coming in with the new EPA ratings anything with more than say 3.0 liters is going to get hit hard in the MPG-- the only logical way to keep suggested MPG up and performance up at the same time would be to introduce more gears across a wider area
on another note i wouldn't be suprised if the top speed of this thing was 190+ it's CD is minimal and it's got serious downforce helping it out.


