Notices

h22 vs gsr motor

Old Nov 21, 2006 | 05:45 AM
  #31  
primetime's Avatar
primetime
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by Snoopy
buddy club IV's are pretty big cams and would require more compression than itr's can give you. maybe if you also milled the head and ran a thin headgasket. but i dislike both of these methods for raising compression as piston to valve clearence becomes an issue. 9500rpm isnt completely necessary. you should only rev as high as you make power. so if power drops off at 8500, no need to go any higher. and that setup is basically only for the internals, you still need a nice flowing header, exhaust, intake manifold, tuning.

the setup i gave you is very simple and will make for a fun daily driver with some pep.
Fortunantly Honda was smart when designing their pistons, the p30 JDM b16b
(SIR II i believe) no milling will give you 11.9:1 compression with a oem 3 layer headgasket and 12.1:1 with a b series 2 layer headgasket. The 9500rpm can be 9000rpm, the rev limit would have to be moved up because of the change to the powerband.

both set-ups are fun reliable daily drivers one going some pep and the other is straight up power. it all depends on what you are trying to achieve.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 10:24 AM
  #32  
Snoopy's Avatar
Snoopy
been there done that
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 30,637
Likes: 0
From: 916
Default

Originally Posted by primetime
Fortunantly Honda was smart when designing their pistons, the p30 JDM b16b
(SIR II i believe) no milling will give you 11.9:1 compression with a oem 3 layer headgasket and 12.1:1 with a b series 2 layer headgasket. The 9500rpm can be 9000rpm, the rev limit would have to be moved up because of the change to the powerband.

both set-ups are fun reliable daily drivers one going some pep and the other is straight up power. it all depends on what you are trying to achieve.
b16b pistons are pct out of ctr motors. and those pistons are horribly designed. the high dome doesnt promote good flame travel and would put you at ~13:1cr in a b18c1. way too high for street use even with 93octane.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 11:08 AM
  #33  
primetime's Avatar
primetime
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by Snoopy
b16b pistons are pct out of ctr motors. and those pistons are horribly designed. the high dome doesnt promote good flame travel and would put you at ~13:1cr in a b18c1. way too high for street use even with 93octane.
Sorry, P30 B16A Sir II, a slightly higher dome than the JDM ITR's! Right Piston number, wrong letter. I didn't mean PCT's, and besides pcts would bend the valves no matter how thick the headgasket is!
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 11:23 AM
  #34  
Snoopy's Avatar
Snoopy
been there done that
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 30,637
Likes: 0
From: 916
Default

alrighty then. p30's are a good choice, but jdm itr's would still give a slightly higher cr.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 12:27 PM
  #35  
primetime's Avatar
primetime
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by Snoopy
alrighty then. p30's are a good choice, but jdm itr's would still give a slightly higher cr.
Heres where this gets weird, because of the higher dome on the p30, putting them into a ITR bock will yield a slightly higher compression ratio, stock CR is 11.1:1 now with p30 it goes to 11.3:1 this is due the 87.20mm crank. In a stock b16a motor with p30's the CR is only 10.4:1 this due to the 77mm crank. In a GSR block the ITR Piston are going to yield a 11.3:1 CR while the P30's will yield an 11.5:1 CR. the higher compression due to the slight difference in the GSR head over the b16 or b18c5's
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2006 | 12:47 PM
  #36  
Snoopy's Avatar
Snoopy
been there done that
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 30,637
Likes: 0
From: 916
Default

we have conflicting numbers here. what are you using to figure compression ratios? im using www.zealautowerks.com which is more accurate than many other c/r calculators i've seen.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 04:57 AM
  #37  
primetime's Avatar
primetime
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by Snoopy
we have conflicting numbers here. what are you using to figure compression ratios? im using www.zealautowerks.com which is more accurate than many other c/r calculators i've seen.
I'm using the www.cspeedracing.com c/r calc.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 07:49 AM
  #38  
Snoopy's Avatar
Snoopy
been there done that
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 30,637
Likes: 0
From: 916
Default

Originally Posted by primetime
I'm using the www.cspeedracing.com c/r calc.
that calculator doesnt take into account the compression height of the pistons
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 08:18 AM
  #39  
primetime's Avatar
primetime
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by Snoopy
that calculator doesnt take into account the compression height of the pistons
Yeah, i just noticed that! Zeal does seem to be more accurate!
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 04:13 PM
  #40  
Kamikaze_ITR's Avatar
Kamikaze_ITR
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default

i'd go with Primetime on this one. Blox are exactly like Snoopy said Skunk2 knock offs. I wouldn't suggest using knock off products inside your engine. Go with the Buddy Club, race proven performance. Well, definitely get your money's worth.
Reply


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:16 PM.