Can't get 91 octane, only 93. Quick questions...
Originally posted by -KangaRod-
really? so why do you have to set the timing then?
really? so why do you have to set the timing then?
Originally posted by inspyral
It's a completely decent idea.
It's a completely decent idea.
I was thinking maybe I could lean out the 7000+ A/F ratio for a little something, any truth to that?
The thought of dropping my VTEC point comes to mind, but I think I remember reading I'd need better airflow first. So maybe after the intake or header or something?
Originally posted by 1stGenCRXer
The only timing that really has to be set is the base timing when the ECU control is bypassed [so that the computer knows where the timing is SUPPOSED to be, which it will still adjust], and the valve timing.
The only timing that really has to be set is the base timing when the ECU control is bypassed [so that the computer knows where the timing is SUPPOSED to be, which it will still adjust], and the valve timing.
I.E. Test 1
Set your base timing @ 0* TDC
Under acceleration lets say that the computers timing map advances timing 12* at 3000 RPM @ 40% throttle position for a total of (0* base + 12* computer advance=) 12*.
Test 2
Now advance your base timing 3*.
Again, under acceleration the computers timing map advances timing 12* at 3000 RPM @ 40% throttle position for a total of (3* advanced from base + 12* computer advance=) 15*.
Originally posted by ur31337
You think I'd get any performance out of the V-AFC? I wouldn't be tuning it myself, I'm not that good.
I was thinking maybe I could lean out the 7000+ A/F ratio for a little something, any truth to that?
The thought of dropping my VTEC point comes to mind, but I think I remember reading I'd need better airflow first. So maybe after the intake or header or something?
You think I'd get any performance out of the V-AFC? I wouldn't be tuning it myself, I'm not that good.
I was thinking maybe I could lean out the 7000+ A/F ratio for a little something, any truth to that?
The thought of dropping my VTEC point comes to mind, but I think I remember reading I'd need better airflow first. So maybe after the intake or header or something?
Originally posted by inspyral
Some dyno time will definitely yield a nice power increase. You're right to want to lean it out a little up top, since most NA Hondas run a bit rich in the upper RPM range. As for your VTEC engagement point, you'll need to play around with it on the dyno and see what setting gives you the smoothest power curve.
Some dyno time will definitely yield a nice power increase. You're right to want to lean it out a little up top, since most NA Hondas run a bit rich in the upper RPM range. As for your VTEC engagement point, you'll need to play around with it on the dyno and see what setting gives you the smoothest power curve.
Originally posted by forcedinduction
Exactly, so advancing the base timing will in effect advance all the timing maps.
Exactly, so advancing the base timing will in effect advance all the timing maps.
However.
The OBD-2 ECUs have a learning capability. It will eventually figure out that the timing has been advanced and make corrections in the signal sent to the ICM to make sure that the actual timing map is what gets carried out. The way to get around this is to cut power to the ECU every time the car is turned off. There are a couple of ways to work it out, but it's not really worth it just to advance the base timing maps a little bit.
Originally posted by MrFatBooty
That's exactly what will happen on an OBD-1 car.
However.
The OBD-2 ECUs have a learning capability. It will eventually figure out that the timing has been advanced and make corrections in the signal sent to the ICM to make sure that the actual timing map is what gets carried out. The way to get around this is to cut power to the ECU every time the car is turned off. There are a couple of ways to work it out, but it's not really worth it just to advance the base timing maps a little bit.
That's exactly what will happen on an OBD-1 car.
However.
The OBD-2 ECUs have a learning capability. It will eventually figure out that the timing has been advanced and make corrections in the signal sent to the ICM to make sure that the actual timing map is what gets carried out. The way to get around this is to cut power to the ECU every time the car is turned off. There are a couple of ways to work it out, but it's not really worth it just to advance the base timing maps a little bit.
just for my info....
Originally posted by spankaveli
Could one leave the service jumper connected? Would that disallow the computer's control of timing? I know on m mustang, the to set timing you pull the spout connecter which in essence removes all computer control of the timing, then put it back in after the timing is set. would this be the same thing as the service jumper?
just for my info....
Could one leave the service jumper connected? Would that disallow the computer's control of timing? I know on m mustang, the to set timing you pull the spout connecter which in essence removes all computer control of the timing, then put it back in after the timing is set. would this be the same thing as the service jumper?
just for my info....


