Dyno charts?
Originally Posted by InfiniteVTec
Hmm DSM's have weak trannies, but are they slow? No
Honda automatic transmissions aren't shitty... look at CVT, Hondas have good transmissions compared to other cars. It's when you have some guy trying to peel out of neutral to drive on an auto that grinds his tranny to tradgedy. If you drive smart, the tranny shouldn't suffer.
A stock M/T boosting high would experience problems as an auto, so what difference does it really make? my conclusion is both will need to be modded either way... tranny is just your choice and prices are your options.
Honda automatic transmissions aren't shitty... look at CVT, Hondas have good transmissions compared to other cars. It's when you have some guy trying to peel out of neutral to drive on an auto that grinds his tranny to tradgedy. If you drive smart, the tranny shouldn't suffer.
A stock M/T boosting high would experience problems as an auto, so what difference does it really make? my conclusion is both will need to be modded either way... tranny is just your choice and prices are your options.
Originally Posted by InfiniteVTec
Hmm DSM's have weak trannies, but are they slow? No
Honda automatic transmissions aren't shitty... look at CVT, Hondas have good transmissions compared to other cars. It's when you have some guy trying to peel out of neutral to drive on an auto that grinds his tranny to tradgedy. If you drive smart, the tranny shouldn't suffer.
A stock M/T boosting high would experience problems as an auto, so what difference does it really make? my conclusion is both will need to be modded either way... tranny is just your choice and prices are your options.
Honda automatic transmissions aren't shitty... look at CVT, Hondas have good transmissions compared to other cars. It's when you have some guy trying to peel out of neutral to drive on an auto that grinds his tranny to tradgedy. If you drive smart, the tranny shouldn't suffer.
A stock M/T boosting high would experience problems as an auto, so what difference does it really make? my conclusion is both will need to be modded either way... tranny is just your choice and prices are your options.
go DIAF ignorant noob
Originally Posted by 2gr84u
Alright smart guy your obviusly MUCH smarter then everyone here, so go ahead and boost your automatic. Also, genius, the auto tranny DSM cars used a smaller turbo then then there manual transmission kin, so according to your retarded logic mitsu was putting a smaller turbo on the autos for no reason eh?
go DIAF ignorant noob
go DIAF ignorant noob
All I'm saying is, no car has a perfect tranny, whether it's auto or manual, each one will have it's problems. A manual tranny stock will last just as long. Both A/T & M/T will need upgrades when boosting.
Originally Posted by InfiniteVTec
I didn't say anything about auto DSM's specifically... I generalized it as DSM's... I know someone with GT3000 VR4, his tranny failed on him sick status. Even some WRX Sti's have weak trannies, they give out slightly upping the boost.
All I'm saying is, no car has a perfect tranny, whether it's auto or manual, each one will have it's problems. A manual tranny stock will last just as long. Both A/T & M/T will need upgrades when boosting.
All I'm saying is, no car has a perfect tranny, whether it's auto or manual, each one will have it's problems. A manual tranny stock will last just as long. Both A/T & M/T will need upgrades when boosting.
you are the most stubborn idiot i think this forum has ever seen.
Originally Posted by JDMPONY00
you are the most stubborn idiot i think this forum has ever seen.
Originally Posted by 2gr84u
:werd: we cant tell him what he doesnt want to hear. He thinks he is right, so by all means let him be happy in his ignorance because its not worth arguing with an idiot
Originally Posted by JDMPONY00
you are the most stubborn idiot i think this forum has ever seen.
Ignorance is not being able to come up with proof of your claims. If so many honda autos producing good #'s are having problems, why haven't you guys come up with some evidence, show me for example... a warranty statement from honda that claims a turbo was the cause of a transmission failure. Then I'll believe you. Til then you guys haven't proven a damn thing. Hearsay doesn't work in courts, and it doesn't work here, sorry.
Originally Posted by InfiniteVTec
Ignorance is not being able to come up with proof of your claims. If so many honda autos producing good #'s are having problems, why haven't you guys come up with some evidence, show me for example... a warranty statement from honda that claims a turbo was the cause of a transmission failure. Then I'll believe you. Til then you guys haven't proven a damn thing. Hearsay doesn't work in courts, and it doesn't work here, sorry.
Originally Posted by InfiniteVTec
Ignorance is not being able to come up with proof of your claims. If so many honda autos producing good #'s are having problems, why haven't you guys come up with some evidence, show me for example... a warranty statement from honda that claims a turbo was the cause of a transmission failure. Then I'll believe you. Til then you guys haven't proven a damn thing. Hearsay doesn't work in courts, and it doesn't work here, sorry.
Just go ahead and boost your engine, Maybe the tranny will withhold the additional power but if it breaks dont come crying here.
This coming from someone who has been running a 55 shot on my automatic civic for 3 years now and my tranny is still fine. so it is possible. but remember nitrous occasionally does not equal the constant abuse of boost.


