Cont. of Evolution vs. Creationism
Originally posted by qtiger
You don't truly believe something if it is the only thing you've ever been taught. That's not faith, that's ignorance.
You don't truly believe something if it is the only thing you've ever been taught. That's not faith, that's ignorance.
Originally posted by exzeltus
Why is it just because you're christian you assume a god exists. Just because all your life your mommy or daddy or church tells you there is a god doesn't make it true either.
Why is it just because you're christian you assume a god exists. Just because all your life your mommy or daddy or church tells you there is a god doesn't make it true either.
n.
1. Confident belief in the truth, value, or trustworthiness of a person, idea, or thing.
2. Belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence. See Synonyms at belief. See Synonyms at trust.
3. Loyalty to a person or thing; allegiance: keeping faith with one's supporters.
often Faith Christianity.
4. The theological virtue defined as secure belief in God and a trusting acceptance of God's will.
5. The body of dogma of a religion: the Muslim faith.
6. A set of principles or beliefs.
Dictionary definition of faith for those of you who seem to not understand the word.
__________________
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
Originally posted by KajiPAX
So you're saying everyone that believes in God is ignorant? That's nice.
So you're saying everyone that believes in God is ignorant? That's nice.
Originally posted by Nightshade
faith ( P )
n.
1. Confident belief in the truth, value, or trustworthiness of a person, idea, or thing.
2. Belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence. See Synonyms at belief. See Synonyms at trust.
3. Loyalty to a person or thing; allegiance: keeping faith with one's supporters.
often Faith Christianity.
4. The theological virtue defined as secure belief in God and a trusting acceptance of God's will.
5. The body of dogma of a religion: the Muslim faith.
6. A set of principles or beliefs.
Dictionary definition of faith for those of you who seem to not understand the word.
faith ( P )
n.
1. Confident belief in the truth, value, or trustworthiness of a person, idea, or thing.
2. Belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence. See Synonyms at belief. See Synonyms at trust.
3. Loyalty to a person or thing; allegiance: keeping faith with one's supporters.
often Faith Christianity.
4. The theological virtue defined as secure belief in God and a trusting acceptance of God's will.
5. The body of dogma of a religion: the Muslim faith.
6. A set of principles or beliefs.
Dictionary definition of faith for those of you who seem to not understand the word.
And that's the problem w/ creationists.
Originally posted by exzeltus
And that's the problem w/ creationists.
And that's the problem w/ creationists.
No one has faith yet everyone has faith at the same time.
Evolutionists have faith that we evolved to our current state since there is no difinitive proof we did evolve.
Creationists or religious people have faith that their god created them, this world and the entire universe.
So as we argue simple semantics and try to prove each other wrong we are forgetting that each person believes how they believe...right or wrong...fact or falsehood....its all relative to the person who believes in whatever they believe in.
__________________
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
Originally posted by Nightshade
No it is the problem with everyone actually.
No one has faith yet everyone has faith at the same time.
Evolutionists have faith that we evolved to our current state since there is no difinitive proof we did evolve.
Creationists or religious people have faith that their god created them, this world and the entire universe.
So as we argue simple semantics and try to prove each other wrong we are forgetting that each person believes how they believe...right or wrong...fact or falsehood....its all relative to the person who believes in whatever they believe in.
No it is the problem with everyone actually.
No one has faith yet everyone has faith at the same time.
Evolutionists have faith that we evolved to our current state since there is no difinitive proof we did evolve.
Creationists or religious people have faith that their god created them, this world and the entire universe.
So as we argue simple semantics and try to prove each other wrong we are forgetting that each person believes how they believe...right or wrong...fact or falsehood....its all relative to the person who believes in whatever they believe in.
Originally posted by 99civic_love
Ok, since I'm one of the few people here who can actually back up their statements w/fact (some can, yes, beautiful thing about most atheists), I've got a couple things to say
The earth being 10,000 years old? eh, no. there's a beautiful thing called carbon dating, and guess what! IT WORKS!
Ok, since I'm one of the few people here who can actually back up their statements w/fact (some can, yes, beautiful thing about most atheists), I've got a couple things to say
The earth being 10,000 years old? eh, no. there's a beautiful thing called carbon dating, and guess what! IT WORKS!
Quoting the Bible to prove a point? How's this: if we take a look at the Gospels in the Bible, they often contradict each other (where jesus was born, what he did, hmm.. thats not good. if i must i will pull those up for you if you don't believe it.) And if you take a look at the other gospels that didn't make it into the bible, you'd be suprised to notice that jesus never says he's the son of god. Thats because his "divinity" was decided after he died. Curious if I'm right? DO an internet search on Paul of Tarsus, Paulinians, Gnosticism, and the meeting at Nicea. And don't even get me started in the mistranslations and changes...
And as for evolution being fact? check out this website, which presents the issue in a non-sided manner:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/evolution-fact.html
the big bang, read the book i suggested earlier. that i don't have a position on.
I'm sorry to rant, but I really get pissed off when people just pull sh*t out of their ass and don't have the facts to back it up. I think if you want to make a point, gimme proof (and don't give me sh*t on you can't prove faith, because there are other things you can prove)
Originally posted by Nightshade
No it is the problem with everyone actually.
No one has faith yet everyone has faith at the same time.
Evolutionists have faith that we evolved to our current state since there is no difinitive proof we did evolve.
Creationists or religious people have faith that their god created them, this world and the entire universe.
So as we argue simple semantics and try to prove each other wrong we are forgetting that each person believes how they believe...right or wrong...fact or falsehood....its all relative to the person who believes in whatever they believe in.
No it is the problem with everyone actually.
No one has faith yet everyone has faith at the same time.
Evolutionists have faith that we evolved to our current state since there is no difinitive proof we did evolve.
Creationists or religious people have faith that their god created them, this world and the entire universe.
So as we argue simple semantics and try to prove each other wrong we are forgetting that each person believes how they believe...right or wrong...fact or falsehood....its all relative to the person who believes in whatever they believe in.
Originally posted by Nightshade
No it is the problem with everyone actually.
No one has faith yet everyone has faith at the same time.
Evolutionists have faith that we evolved to our current state since there is no difinitive proof we did evolve.
Creationists or religious people have faith that their god created them, this world and the entire universe.
So as we argue simple semantics and try to prove each other wrong we are forgetting that each person believes how they believe...right or wrong...fact or falsehood....its all relative to the person who believes in whatever they believe in.
No it is the problem with everyone actually.
No one has faith yet everyone has faith at the same time.
Evolutionists have faith that we evolved to our current state since there is no difinitive proof we did evolve.
Creationists or religious people have faith that their god created them, this world and the entire universe.
So as we argue simple semantics and try to prove each other wrong we are forgetting that each person believes how they believe...right or wrong...fact or falsehood....its all relative to the person who believes in whatever they believe in.
The bible wasn't written during the time of Jesus. It was passed down through oral tradition. Don't you think a little embellishment and fabrication goes on?
For me, though I haven't studied every theory out there, I have seen enough to deny it's accuracy.
I wish I had my religion professor here to talk to you guys.
Okay here goes...
In Judaism if you have anything with G-d's name written on it, you have to give it a "funeral" when you're done using it. Like when a Torah gets worn out they bury it out behind the synagogue with a ceremony and all.
Creationism is based solely on religion. Christian values and beliefs should not be imposed on public school children that are not Christian. Since creationism is a religious belief, we should not teach creationism in public schools where not all students are members of that religion. If you want your kid to learn about creationism in school, then send them to private school.
Every single thing in science is a theory. Have you ever taken a science class? Every scientific "fact" can be proven wrong by finding one contradictory scientific (i.e. not religious) example. It is the government's job to teach science regardless of any sort of conflict it may have with certain people's religion. Once again, if you don't like it then go to private school.
To repeat: that's what private school is for.
Evolution takes far more time than recorded human history. We have records that go back at most what 10,000 years (if you talk about like, ancient China) so there's no way we would be able to witness it as it happens. Evolution is a theory used to explain the fossil record. Like they say in the introduction to any science class, a theory is something that is accepted to be true because all of the evidence supports it but may at some time in the future be proven wrong by more actual evidence.
To repeat: evolution is an explanation of the fossil record. It is proven not by evidence that we are able to see as living things in the present time or at any ponit during recorded human history.
Adaptation can be either an accquired trait (i.e. developed by the organism during its lifetime) or a genetic mutation. Accquired traits are not passed on to offspring, genetic mutations are. It still happens on such an inordinately large scale of time that there is no way recorded human history would be able to witness evolution as it occurs.
Creationism will always be rooted in religion. There can be scientific explanations of it, but it is still a religious belief and therefore cannot be proved in the absence of faith. While it may have some merits, there is no way that you can say with total certainty that what is written in the Bible means exactly what it says. It's been around for too long and translated too many times to not have been reinterpreted at some point. Additionally the whole thing was originally written down by humans. We all know that humans are falliable creatures (most religions state that only G-d is infalliable) so there could be any number of mistakes, exaggerations, omissions, etc.
It's still not science, it's religion. Therefore it is too much religion for schools whose entire purpose is to not teach religion. You want religion in your school? Go to a private school.
Wow I'm repeating myself again. If you want both to be taught, go to a private school. Creation is religion, and public schools don't teach religion. That's it.
The Bible is literature. It doesn't function as a factual source.
Originally posted by KajiPAX
Why do you write G-d like that?
Why do you write G-d like that?
Originally posted by KajiPAX
Which is horribly wrong, because in school when evolution is taught it conflicts with Christian's beliefs. So when a kid/teenager absorbs the information as he/she sees fit all that winds up happening is confusing the kid about his/her own Christian faith and weakens it. Since when was Adam a monkey?
Which is horribly wrong, because in school when evolution is taught it conflicts with Christian's beliefs. So when a kid/teenager absorbs the information as he/she sees fit all that winds up happening is confusing the kid about his/her own Christian faith and weakens it. Since when was Adam a monkey?
Originally posted by KajiPAX
It shouldn't be the state's job to teach children evolution. Evolution is a theory and therefor requires a sort of faith to believe in since it isn't proven. That makes it a form of religion.
It shouldn't be the state's job to teach children evolution. Evolution is a theory and therefor requires a sort of faith to believe in since it isn't proven. That makes it a form of religion.
Originally posted by KajiPAX
Nope, you think just because its a theory it shouldn't be taught? You missed the point. It doesn't make kids question their own religion. It doesn't conflict with anything.
Nope, you think just because its a theory it shouldn't be taught? You missed the point. It doesn't make kids question their own religion. It doesn't conflict with anything.
Originally posted by Nightshade
If evolution were true we would still see it happening even on the most minute scale in the course of tie that we have been watching and documenting things around us not one evolutionary development has been noted.
If evolution were true we would still see it happening even on the most minute scale in the course of tie that we have been watching and documenting things around us not one evolutionary development has been noted.
Originally posted by Nightshade
Hahahah....still doesn't prove evolution if it did it owuld be a study that proves that we are growing thick wooly coats in preperation of another ice age.
Hahahah....still doesn't prove evolution if it did it owuld be a study that proves that we are growing thick wooly coats in preperation of another ice age.
Originally posted by Nightshade
Adaptation is different though.
Adaptation can involve any number of things....Humans adapt the environment to suit them...cutting trees adding roads etc. It doesn't mean anything is evolving in any way shape or form.
Evolution would mean that there is a change on some either molecular level or actual physical change...a third eye, a series of claws in place of nails, or anything even remotely close to that.
I realize the examples are on the extreme end but you get the picture.
Adaptation is different though.
Adaptation can involve any number of things....Humans adapt the environment to suit them...cutting trees adding roads etc. It doesn't mean anything is evolving in any way shape or form.
Evolution would mean that there is a change on some either molecular level or actual physical change...a third eye, a series of claws in place of nails, or anything even remotely close to that.
I realize the examples are on the extreme end but you get the picture.
Originally posted by dwinkjr
If u teach the theory of evolution then u must teach the theory of creationism as it has just as much if not more evidence to back it up then evolution ever will... ( i am in class now when i get home i will get out my scientific books and let u knwo all the evidence for creationism that ur great scientists have found)
If u teach the theory of evolution then u must teach the theory of creationism as it has just as much if not more evidence to back it up then evolution ever will... ( i am in class now when i get home i will get out my scientific books and let u knwo all the evidence for creationism that ur great scientists have found)
Originally posted by dwinkjr
Actually it is a Scentific theory and has more Scientific evidence backing it then evolution.. but all the Anti-religion folks think it is too much religion for school as i be a Christian feel evolution with all its lil holes should not be taught in school.... Bottom line is both these Theories are just that until they are proven. So if u are going to teach one theory u should teach them both but make it very clear that they are just that theories.
Personally i have my FAITH and some good research that tells me creationism is a much more viable answer to how we as humans
got to where we are today.
Actually it is a Scentific theory and has more Scientific evidence backing it then evolution.. but all the Anti-religion folks think it is too much religion for school as i be a Christian feel evolution with all its lil holes should not be taught in school.... Bottom line is both these Theories are just that until they are proven. So if u are going to teach one theory u should teach them both but make it very clear that they are just that theories.
Personally i have my FAITH and some good research that tells me creationism is a much more viable answer to how we as humans
got to where we are today.
Originally posted by KajiPAX
AS I said before, it contradicts with what's taught in the Bible, and for those students that do believe in the Bible & God ... and for those students that lesiurley believe in God that's very dangerous because even that could cause them to drift away since they start doubting what they originally believed. Should state have power to do that? No.
And I'm not saying let teach Creation soley because that would cause more problems. If you're going to teach one, you better teach both. If not, then nothing at all.
AS I said before, it contradicts with what's taught in the Bible, and for those students that do believe in the Bible & God ... and for those students that lesiurley believe in God that's very dangerous because even that could cause them to drift away since they start doubting what they originally believed. Should state have power to do that? No.
And I'm not saying let teach Creation soley because that would cause more problems. If you're going to teach one, you better teach both. If not, then nothing at all.
Originally posted by DB7 2.0
i will ask you then. show me in the Bible where the verses contradict themselves. and the other books that didnt "make it in the Bible"...do you even know how the books of the Bible were brought together??? you've repeated the same stuff many aethiests ive met in person and conversed with...yet just like them, i doubt you will have any concrete proof and knowledge to back your statements up, other than what "other people have told you".
i will ask you then. show me in the Bible where the verses contradict themselves. and the other books that didnt "make it in the Bible"...do you even know how the books of the Bible were brought together??? you've repeated the same stuff many aethiests ive met in person and conversed with...yet just like them, i doubt you will have any concrete proof and knowledge to back your statements up, other than what "other people have told you".


