Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

New RX-8 not making 250 HP.....

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 5, 2003 | 09:22 AM
  #11  
airon's Avatar
airon
AARONNOJIMA.COM
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,559
Likes: 0
From: Elk Grove, Ca AOL/AI
Default

its not even out yet for a few months
they are going to tweak it and what not
think about it this way they are making almost as much claimed hp as their tubo rotary in the rx7

one they tweak this, then it only means that another incarnation of the rx7 can come in the future
__________________
"Dreaming is how the strong survive....."
"Am I dying to live, or living to die?"
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2003 | 09:25 AM
  #12  
The Beav's Avatar
The Beav
i
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,277
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by airon
its not even out yet for a few months
they are going to tweak it and what not
think about it this way they are making almost as much claimed hp as their tubo rotary in the rx7

one they tweak this, then it only means that another incarnation of the rx7 can come in the future
i think it was one of mazda's engineers said that if the rx-8 does well then another sports car rotary will likely be made in the same spirit as the rx-7

and mazdaspeed is building a turbo rx-8 for limited production
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2003 | 10:30 AM
  #13  
evolution's Avatar
evolution
早晨好, 先生們!™ 粉腸+ 春袋
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 8,730
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

Originally posted by puffy
have you ever thought about the fact that 250 is not to the wheel but to the crank? I mean even s2000 only makes around 210whp.
190 to the wheels
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2003 | 10:39 AM
  #14  
Jkan2001's Avatar
Jkan2001
S2000 Pilot
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,457
Likes: 0
From: 9000 RPMS
Default

Originally posted by puffy
have you ever thought about the fact that 250 is not to the wheel but to the crank? I mean even s2000 only makes around 210whp.

s2000's make around 199 whp stock not 210
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2003 | 10:42 AM
  #15  
evolution's Avatar
evolution
早晨好, 先生們!™ 粉腸+ 春袋
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 8,730
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

Originally posted by Jkan2001
s2000's make around 199 whp stock not 210
it's around 190-195ish, one freak s2 made 200 stock....but that's it (source s2ki.com)
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2003 | 04:29 PM
  #16  
Jkan2001's Avatar
Jkan2001
S2000 Pilot
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,457
Likes: 0
From: 9000 RPMS
Default

Originally posted by evolution
it's around 190-195ish, one freak s2 made 200 stock....but that's it (source s2ki.com)
that explains why i can beat them pretty easily....

190 whp 2800+ pounds vs. almost between 180-200 guestimated whp but only 2516 pounds. There was one at the 1/8th mile track last night that ran a best of 9.42 with decent launches. I pulled a 9.1 @ over 80, never got to race him though.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2003 | 04:55 PM
  #17  
brtecson's Avatar
brtecson
pukimonster
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,967
Likes: 2
From: Milwaukee, WI
Default

Originally posted by elbee
I'm talking manufacturers ratings--that's flywheel people. Apples to apples. I would guess WHP to be in the 190s. You watch, I'll be right--that will prove the flywheel raing ain't 250.

I didn't say quarter-mile times I said trap speeds, which are an indicator of HP.
ETs are about traction, especially 0-60.
:jerkit:

trap speed hp ratings are never anywhere near accurate. Look at the powerband of the RENESIS engine. With 150ft/lbs of torque, it has a pretty peaky powerband.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2003 | 05:28 PM
  #18  
MrFatbooty's Avatar
MrFatbooty
Wannabe yuppie
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Default

And here I thought someone had actually put a car on the dyno and got an unfavorable result.

STFU magazine racer. :madfawk:
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2003 | 06:50 PM
  #19  
brtecson's Avatar
brtecson
pukimonster
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,967
Likes: 2
From: Milwaukee, WI
Default

I just wrote a five page paper about the new rx-8 for my engineering class. Maybe somebody can tell me what the "three stage, six port induction system" is? I read that in an article but they dont explain what it is. I'm guessing its some system that has one intake port open to x rpm, then opens up another port at x rpm, then has all three open at x rpm?


Oh and by the way, scratch what i said earlier, the engine makes 161 ft/lbs, not 150
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2003 | 07:05 PM
  #20  
MrFatbooty's Avatar
MrFatbooty
Wannabe yuppie
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Default

I don't know the exact details, but the 6-port intake was introduced on the 13b motor in the 1984 RX-7 GSL-SE.

This is a 4-port manifold:



This is a 6-port manifold (disregard the carbeurator sitting next to it):



There's a valve somewhere that causes the secondary ports to kick on, I think it might have something to do with exhaust backpressure but I forget exactly how the system works.

3-stage I would presume means that in addition to the 6-port system, the intake manifold has some kind of variability to its length kind of like the GSR manifold.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:05 PM.