Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Math Help

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 03:06 PM
  #11  
F22B Prelude's Avatar
F22B Prelude
Thread Starter
Rachel Bilson
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,230
Likes: 0
From: South Bend/Walkerton, Ind
Default

I just called them and the dude figured out my question in less than 2 minutes from me reading him the problem...but I still don't understand
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 03:06 PM
  #12  
LT's Avatar
LT
The deer had to die!
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 39,835
Likes: 0
From: Fussa, Japan
Default

Got it.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 03:07 PM
  #13  
R_Squared's Avatar
R_Squared
LEVEL UP
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,426
Likes: 1
From: Indianapolis
Default

Originally Posted by LT
Got it.
...and? :bs:
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 03:12 PM
  #14  
LT's Avatar
LT
The deer had to die!
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 39,835
Likes: 0
From: Fussa, Japan
Default

this might help
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
piecewise.JPG (15.2 KB, 25 views)
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 03:28 PM
  #15  
F22B Prelude's Avatar
F22B Prelude
Thread Starter
Rachel Bilson
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,230
Likes: 0
From: South Bend/Walkerton, Ind
Default

Thanks, but don't forget the open hole at (-1, 11)
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 03:34 PM
  #16  
Red X's Avatar
Red X
x pǝɹ
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,246
Likes: 1
From: Upstate
Default

Originally Posted by F22B Prelude
Find all values of x where the function is discontinuous ....

g(x) = 11 if x < 2

x^2 + 2 if -1 < or equal x < or equal 3

11 if x > 3
I don't understand whats happening:

-1<=x<=3 then y=x^2+2
x<2 then y=11
x > 3 then y = 11

You have a conflict with the definition: x can't take on two values (i.e. be x^2+2 @x<=3 and also be 11@x<2). Are you sure its not x<-2 ?

But by either definition I don't think its discontinuous anywhere. A discontinuity (I thought) was when you had no y-values for a range of x. It appears you have either more than 1 value of y for an x OR only a 1:1 map (a defined, continuous function).

Last edited by Red X; Jan 21, 2009 at 03:53 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 03:43 PM
  #17  
F22B Prelude's Avatar
F22B Prelude
Thread Starter
Rachel Bilson
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,230
Likes: 0
From: South Bend/Walkerton, Ind
Default

Originally Posted by Red X
I don't understand whats happening:

-1<=x<=3 then y=x^2+2
x<2 then y=11
x > 3 then y = 11

You have a conflict with the definition: x can't take on two values (i.e. be x^2+2 @x<=3 and also be 11@x<2). Are you sure its not x<-2 ?
My bad I merged two problems

11 if x < -1
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 03:44 PM
  #18  
95SiR's Avatar
95SiR
hood rich
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 35,752
Likes: 0
From: los josengeles
Default

Originally Posted by dj02
came here to post that
__________________
In Loving Memory
R.I.P. Huan Vo aka woong
01.14.1979 - 11.19.2008
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 03:56 PM
  #19  
Red X's Avatar
Red X
x pǝɹ
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,246
Likes: 1
From: Upstate
Default

Originally Posted by F22B Prelude
My bad I merged two problems

11 if x < -1
For this one you have to know how the range is defined. Is this function defined for all real numbers? If so, then it is discontinuous when x >= -1. If y=0 when x>-1 then its discontinuous (there's a jump) @ x=-1.

-1 <=x <=3; y=x^2 + 2
x > 3; y= 11
Similarly, this would be discontinuous outside the range if you are dealing with real numbers. So whenever x<-1.

In all cases, if x was limited by the definition in the right way(say x could only take on values >-1) then the function in problem #2 could never be discontinuous.

Notice that @x=3, y=11 which is the same when x>3, this means there is no 'jump' or discontinuity at that point. i.e. the limit as you approach from the right is the same as the left.

Last edited by Red X; Jan 21, 2009 at 04:30 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 04:09 PM
  #20  
95SiR's Avatar
95SiR
hood rich
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 35,752
Likes: 0
From: los josengeles
Default

Originally Posted by Red X
For this one you have to know how range is defined. Is this function defined for all real numbers? If so, then it is discontinuous when x >= -1.

Similarly, this would be discontinuous outside the range if you are dealing with real numbers. So whenever x<-1.

In all cases, if x was limited by the definition in the right way(say x could only take on values >-1) then the function in problem #2 could never be discontinuous.
and heres the red one.
__________________
In Loving Memory
R.I.P. Huan Vo aka woong
01.14.1979 - 11.19.2008
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:41 PM.