Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Dec 9 - goin to war?

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 7, 2002 | 11:55 AM
  #11  
Nightshade's Avatar
Nightshade
un-Touch'd krew
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 51,774
Likes: 1
From: My own level of hell
Default

Originally posted by DVPGSR
And if it takes a war to get rid of Saddam Hussein that is still one step closer to world peace...a sort of "Win, Win" situation!
More like global domination but I agree with your comments on my previous post...except for the part about "we would already be at war".

If Bush were to go directly to war without any approval whatsoever it would cause him to be ousted by the senate regardless of their political views. Therefore, he has to ride in on the coattails of a national tragedy.

Disguised at first as a "War on terrorism" it quickly shifted into a personal assault on a man that George Sr. tried to go after for reasons that were also unclear and questionable (at least in my mind).

I may be wrong and I am more than wiling to admit when I am but I do not see Bush doing any good for our country and he is covering over this shortcoming by diverting peoples attention to the Middle East.
__________________
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
Old Dec 7, 2002 | 02:27 PM
  #12  
DVPGSR's Avatar
DVPGSR
I need sleep...
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
From: NH
Default

Originally posted by /^Blackmagik^\
wow... you severely underestimate the readiness of our armed forces dude. the longest it would take to get all the troops necessary for an engagement such as iraq there and in action is 2 weeks tops. and that's not including the equipment and manpower that's already in the area.

let's just say that if dec 9 is the deadline and they don't comply.... dec 10'th we're fighting in the sand again.
OK let me rephrase my statement...it appears I did not clearly write what I was thinking. We have troops in the Gulf that can strike at Iraq at a moments notice. When and if Bush decides to attack Iraq America will be able to do so. However there is going to be some time that over the next month that the US will try and convince the rest of the security council that Iraq is lying...and then convince them that there must be a war. France and Russia will want a vote on it which will require more time. All the while the US will be moving the 250,000 or so troops to the Gulf that is going to require ousting Saddam. Once all diplomatic means are exhausted, or there is a unanimous vote we will then go to war. I do not think that this will happen at the earliest till February. Iraq has a government that the Unite Nations recognizes where as Afghanistan did not. It is hard to overthrow a leader who is part of the UN without the UNs approval.
Old Dec 7, 2002 | 03:37 PM
  #13  
Bl@ck's Avatar
Bl@ck
Sinner
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,599
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
Default

Originally posted by DVPGSR
OK let me rephrase my statement...it appears I did not clearly write what I was thinking. We have troops in the Gulf that can strike at Iraq at a moments notice. When and if Bush decides to attack Iraq America will be able to do so. However there is going to be some time that over the next month that the US will try and convince the rest of the security council that Iraq is lying...and then convince them that there must be a war. France and Russia will want a vote on it which will require more time. All the while the US will be moving the 250,000 or so troops to the Gulf that is going to require ousting Saddam. Once all diplomatic means are exhausted, or there is a unanimous vote we will then go to war. I do not think that this will happen at the earliest till February. Iraq has a government that the Unite Nations recognizes where as Afghanistan did not. It is hard to overthrow a leader who is part of the UN without the UNs approval.
all that said... who's to say that those UN votes aren't already taking place and that the 250,000 or so troops you speak of aren't already there. no one but those who make these decisions knows at what stage this is in. once they say that for certain we're going to war sever battles will have already been fought. i'm personally thinking more like middle of december. say the 15th or so.
Old Dec 7, 2002 | 09:31 PM
  #14  
DVPGSR's Avatar
DVPGSR
I need sleep...
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
From: NH
Default

Originally posted by /^Blackmagik^\
all that said... who's to say that those UN votes aren't already taking place and that the 250,000 or so troops you speak of aren't already there. no one but those who make these decisions knows at what stage this is in. once they say that for certain we're going to war sever battles will have already been fought. i'm personally thinking more like middle of december. say the 15th or so.
If you are right I have no problems with that. I just think that politics will play another factor in delaying the inevitable...one thing we both agree on is the war will happen...our own timeframes are a little off!
Old Dec 8, 2002 | 09:34 AM
  #15  
qtiger's Avatar
qtiger
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,776
Likes: 0
Default

There are already troops staging in Oman, for those of you thinking it will take us a long time to deploy. They've been there for 3 months.
Old Dec 8, 2002 | 12:03 PM
  #16  
Bl@ck's Avatar
Bl@ck
Sinner
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,599
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
Default

Originally posted by qtiger
There are already troops staging in Oman, for those of you thinking it will take us a long time to deploy. They've been there for 3 months.
as well as ass loads of equipment and troops massing in kuwait and turkey. pretty much as soon as GW gives the word we're crossing borders and laying waste to baghdad.




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:11 AM.