Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Great, the libs are at it

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 08:10 AM
  #41  
98CoupeV6's Avatar
98CoupeV6
Thread Starter
lots and lots of fail
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 23,004
Likes: 1
From: Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeetroit
Default

Then explain to me how I don't know what I'm talking about.

What backs up our money? Gold and credit. We have far more credit than we do gold in Fort Knox. It IS just glorified paper, a promissory note by the Treasury Department. (edit: I couldn't remember at the time, but this is called Fiat money or Fiat standard or something like that)

I never said we actually do print more money to cover debt I said we CAN. What is it with you and picking out 3 words of a 50 word post to argue with?

Last edited by 98CoupeV6; Aug 9, 2007 at 08:14 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 08:15 AM
  #42  
Nightshade's Avatar
Nightshade
un-Touch'd krew
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 51,774
Likes: 1
From: My own level of hell
Default

Originally Posted by 98CoupeV6
Then explain to me how I don't know what I'm talking about.

What backs up our money? Gold and credit. We have far more credit than we do gold in Fort Knox. It IS just glorified paper, a promissory note by the Treasury Department. (edit: I couldn't remember at the time, but this is called Fiat money or Fiat standard or something like that)

I never said we actually do print more money to cover debt I said we CAN. What is it with you and picking out 3 words of a 50 word post to argue with?
Because those 3 words make your statement a complete fallacy
__________________
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 08:16 AM
  #43  
bnuk's Avatar
bnuk
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
From: pittsburgh.
Default

Originally Posted by rebeld
werd

should fall on the shoulders of individual state governments, not the federal government.
yes because the state gov doesn't get their money from taxpayers, oh wait they do.

i dunno, if something is gonna get taxed im all for gas. its too cheap anyway. :run:
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 08:17 AM
  #44  
2001TEGGSR's Avatar
2001TEGGSR
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,270
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Oh how I don't miss paying state income Taxes.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 08:20 AM
  #45  
98CoupeV6's Avatar
98CoupeV6
Thread Starter
lots and lots of fail
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 23,004
Likes: 1
From: Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeetroit
Default

Originally Posted by Nightshade
Because those 3 words make your statement a complete fallacy
It wasn't a statement, wtf :rofl: You said "the government cannot", meaning it's impossible, I said that they can as other countries have in the past. I didn't say they they should or do or ever will. It was semantics.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 08:25 AM
  #46  
reno96teg's Avatar
reno96teg
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 21,573
Likes: 0
Default

"temporary"

yeah right.

the fact is, the tax we currently pay on gas is more than enough. the problem is that these dirtbags dip into it for reasons other than what that tax is intended for.

of course, every time they try to sell a tax increase to the american public, they're not going to say, "we want to add 5 cents to fund another increase on our pensions".. they'll use some bogus sob story like this one.

the fucking public needs to wake up. :down:
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 08:26 AM
  #47  
RB's Avatar
RB
snitches get stitches
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 49,696
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by 98CoupeV6
It wasn't a statement, wtf :rofl: You said "the government cannot", meaning it's impossible, I said that they can as other countries have in the past. I didn't say they they should or do or ever will. It was semantics.
Physically, in the most base sense of the definition, they can actually produce money with machines. With that said, it cannot and will not happen according to the US's monetary policy. I repeat, it will never, ever be done. Case closed.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 08:30 AM
  #48  
98CoupeV6's Avatar
98CoupeV6
Thread Starter
lots and lots of fail
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 23,004
Likes: 1
From: Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeetroit
Default

Originally Posted by RB
Physically, in the most base sense of the definition, they can actually produce money with machines. With that said, it cannot and will not happen according to the US's monetary policy. I repeat, it will never, ever be done. Case closed.
Ryan, that wasn't my point at all and you know that...
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 08:33 AM
  #49  
RB's Avatar
RB
snitches get stitches
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 49,696
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by 98CoupeV6
Ryan, that wasn't my point at all and you know that...
I don't know what the hell point you're trying to make, because none of what you're saying has any factual base behind it. I just don't think you have a grasp of the US monetary policy or how our treasury department operates on a fundamental level.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 08:56 AM
  #50  
shirley's Avatar
shirley
CBOTY 2010
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 34,786
Likes: 0
From: MI
Default

Originally Posted by bnuk
yes because the state gov doesn't get their money from taxpayers, oh wait they do.

i dunno, if something is gonna get taxed im all for gas. its too cheap anyway. :run:
right ... like i said ... leave it up to the states. its the states duty to maintain the safety of their roads. cities handle city roads, county handle county roads and so forth.

so why should i start paying more federal taxes to fix a bridge in utah? if a state decides they dont have enough road funds to fix their bridges then fine put it up to a vote in that state ballot to increase the tax. dont make people in Maine pay for bridges in Texas. its silly
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:59 PM.