Originally Posted by e3NiNe

you can have a great running game, but the threat of an accurate passer keeps the defense guessing. I saw this in Chicago all last season ... no QB = 1 dimensional offense = no points.

He could be overrated, but he's good enough to win games.

Originally Posted by RB

The running game isn't orchestrated by the QB. He hands the ball off in a manner most fitting for the half/full/running back and watches the play, applying a block if absolutely necessary (and if they have the balls). A corrdinated offensive line is the core of the running game. If you think any different, I pity you.

Originally Posted by RB

Well yeah, that goes for every quarterback, which is why I'm saying he's overrated. Do you know how many teams saw that the Steelers were run heavy and still couldn't stop them?

Originally Posted by RB

Well yeah, that goes for every quarterback, which is why I'm saying he's overrated. Do you know how many teams saw that the Steelers were run heavy and still couldn't stop them?

Originally Posted by zma21

A good QB can be just as important as a good running back in the running game. Through counters and options the QB runs the show and makes his best decision of where the ball goes, and who it goes to. Tell me again you can throw anybody in this position and succeed.h:

Originally Posted by RB

I'd like to see Roethlisberger in a setup that lacks a solid offensive line and see how he does.

Originally Posted by RB

In a setup like Pittsburgh's, I still think a decent quarterback can succeed. I'd like to see Roethlisberger in a setup that lacks a solid offensive line and see how he does.

Originally Posted by e3NiNe

deadman walking.

He doesn't have the speed to evade a pass rush. He'd be nothing more than a gigantic target.

Originally Posted by reno96teg

anyone find it ironic that he plays a sport where safety is emphasized (helmet, body padding, etc.), and then he gets on a bike and rides with no helmet?

moron.