AOL hates white people!!!
Originally Posted by IluvJae
I read it and i was trying to figure out where the racism was. is there a band named whitey or something :dunno:
Whitey is slang for a white person. Read it more carefully.
Originally Posted by Tark
and why is that? the history is there, it's a fact... nothing made up. It has shaped our world today internationally. Slavery of black people, the aparthide, the Asian railroad workers here in Canada... all of that is bullshit all of that should be forgotten?
The "European" white man has committed racist acts(not just stupid little articles like the one you are bitching about) against Blacks, Indians, Arabs, Asian ect... and you dare say that all that "the history card" is lame? They even killed alot of other white people like the Jews and they still bitch about it... but hey it's all lame right
The "European" white man has committed racist acts(not just stupid little articles like the one you are bitching about) against Blacks, Indians, Arabs, Asian ect... and you dare say that all that "the history card" is lame? They even killed alot of other white people like the Jews and they still bitch about it... but hey it's all lame right

People should go by what happens today not what happend a long time ago, sure it happend and it sucks but point is it happend and isnt happening anymore, If everything was about history then well it would be a completely different world. Nelson Mandela for one would even have been president, He was in jail for killing people , but the past was forgiven and he was able to run for president.
Im just saying the History card is lame
Originally Posted by Nightshade
So why hold everyone in check for what happened generations ago?
who was responsible for those actions? I know for damn sure it wasn't me...pretty sure it wasn't anyone who is currently alive in fact.
Forget about this shit? No don't forget about it but don't use it as a fucking crutch because anyone who is white is the "white devil"...complete bullshit I didn't do shit to anyone based on race and I do not agree with treating anyone differently due to culture or racial reasons...so how long do I have to be held captive by the race card?
who was responsible for those actions? I know for damn sure it wasn't me...pretty sure it wasn't anyone who is currently alive in fact.
Forget about this shit? No don't forget about it but don't use it as a fucking crutch because anyone who is white is the "white devil"...complete bullshit I didn't do shit to anyone based on race and I do not agree with treating anyone differently due to culture or racial reasons...so how long do I have to be held captive by the race card?
held captive? how so?? and i am trying to explain why that article is not a big deal, and not worth bitching about. It's not like a bunch of black people went to a shopping mall and killed all the whites is it? Trying to explain why it would not be appropriate to write a similar article on black people because of the past, because it is part of their history. it a fucking web article... and lets not pretend that this kind of so called "reverse racism" is now more popular then "traditional racism"
Originally Posted by Tark
I understand the YOU are not directly responsible for those actions, just like i am not directly responsible for bombing shit... but still everyday i tell someone i am Muslim they look at me with a strange look on their face. Some even drew some cartoon about Muslims and their prophets and shit... it's a part of life that you, although are a single person, are part of a bigger group and that group is the one repressible for some shit that happened in the past.
held captive? how so?? and i am trying to explain why that article is not a big deal, and not worth bitching about. It's not like a bunch of black people went to a shopping mall and killed all the whites is it? Trying to explain why it would not be appropriate to write a similar article on black people because of the past, because it is part of their history. it a fucking web article... and lets not pretend that this kind of so called "reverse racism" is now more popular then "traditional racism"
held captive? how so?? and i am trying to explain why that article is not a big deal, and not worth bitching about. It's not like a bunch of black people went to a shopping mall and killed all the whites is it? Trying to explain why it would not be appropriate to write a similar article on black people because of the past, because it is part of their history. it a fucking web article... and lets not pretend that this kind of so called "reverse racism" is now more popular then "traditional racism"
But let's just say for example that the article had said Ni**er or camel jockey or chink, maybe Wop or Kike even and used continued slam terms further in the article as it had using the words honkey among others. Now if that had been the case what would have happened?
Pretty simple really..The ACLU would have been all over it, the news agencies would have reported it, radio commentators would have a week of new fodder and stories to run with etc.
But since it's talking about white people it is inconsequential and not a bad thing.
This is called reverse racism (figure that term out) since it is the majority being discriminated on by a minority (minority another term I disagree with). So by saying there is no problem with this article and the terms it uses is in effect saying racism is ok if you are talking about the majority, but if you are discussing a minority or a race that has been wronged in the past then it is wrong and offensive (also known as a double standard).
Basically I should be against whitey as well though the colour of my skin is white (anglo whatever) I am also Irish and my ancestors were in the same camps as the Chinese brought for the railroads, they were barred from work for years and forced to starve and suffer in the US for many years before being considered somewhat equal to others who lived here.
__________________
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
Originally Posted by loafeidb
How much do you actually know about apartheid, were you there to experience it on both sides???
People should go by what happens today not what happend a long time ago, sure it happend and it sucks but point is it happend and isnt happening anymore, If everything was about history then well it would be a completely different world. Nelson Mandela for one would even have been president, He was in jail for killing people , but the past was forgiven and he was able to run for president.
Im just saying the History card is lame
People should go by what happens today not what happend a long time ago, sure it happend and it sucks but point is it happend and isnt happening anymore, If everything was about history then well it would be a completely different world. Nelson Mandela for one would even have been president, He was in jail for killing people , but the past was forgiven and he was able to run for president.
Im just saying the History card is lame
dude those still happened, and i am not saying that "everything is about history" i am as i said before, explaining why white people shouldn't start bitching about this kind of thing...
Originally Posted by Tark
I understand the YOU are not directly responsible for those actions, just like i am not directly responsible for bombing shit... but still everyday i tell someone i am Muslim they look at me with a strange look on their face. Some even drew some cartoon about Muslims and their prophets and shit... it's a part of life that you, although are a single person, are part of a bigger group and that group is the one repressible for some shit that happened in the past.
held captive? how so?? and i am trying to explain why that article is not a big deal, and not worth bitching about. It's not like a bunch of black people went to a shopping mall and killed all the whites is it? Trying to explain why it would not be appropriate to write a similar article on black people because of the past, because it is part of their history. it a fucking web article... and lets not pretend that this kind of so called "reverse racism" is now more popular then "traditional racism"
held captive? how so?? and i am trying to explain why that article is not a big deal, and not worth bitching about. It's not like a bunch of black people went to a shopping mall and killed all the whites is it? Trying to explain why it would not be appropriate to write a similar article on black people because of the past, because it is part of their history. it a fucking web article... and lets not pretend that this kind of so called "reverse racism" is now more popular then "traditional racism"
I (having lived in South Africa) have seen all sides on the arguments, and instead of people not saying anything , they bring up history.
but you my friend do bring up a valid argument and I respect you more for that
Originally Posted by Nightshade
This is called reverse racism (figure that term out) since it is the majority being discriminated on by a minority (minority another term I disagree with). So by saying there is no problem with this article and the terms it uses is in effect saying racism is ok if you are talking about the majority, but if you are discussing a minority or a race that has been wronged in the past then it is wrong and offensive (also known as a double standard).
EDIT to clarify my post
h:
Last edited by Tark; Apr 23, 2006 at 01:28 PM.


