Is my view really so wrong?
it's my D in a B
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 24,787
Likes: 1
From: Your Mom's House
Originally Posted by Nightshade
Is it really?
Consider it from a national security standpoint. Any of these people coming across the border illegaly could be here to do harm, importing drugs (Mexican cops in this case), or otherwise are breaking our laws blatantly. This is a national security concern when you boil it all down.
Consider it from a national security standpoint. Any of these people coming across the border illegaly could be here to do harm, importing drugs (Mexican cops in this case), or otherwise are breaking our laws blatantly. This is a national security concern when you boil it all down.
snitches get stitches
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 49,696
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
Originally Posted by Nightshade
Then the laws on border guarding need to be modified because as they stand the laws currently in effect aint doing shit to protect us.
The day the US government passes a law that allows border patrol to kill border hoppers is the day I get on my knees and suck your dick.
I missed Sean
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,285
Likes: 1
From: Fairfield/Bridgeport CT
i'd be safe to say the casualties with non leathal rounds would most likely be more severe.
the idea is you shoot someone, and then they know you're serious. non leathal rounds do sometimes kill-- the problem is that people will get the brihgt idea that they can jsut run right thru get hit 5 times and be scott free, do that 10,000 times and thats lets say 50 dead vs like 5 or 6 with leathal rounds that are more effective at keeping them back anyways.
the idea is you shoot someone, and then they know you're serious. non leathal rounds do sometimes kill-- the problem is that people will get the brihgt idea that they can jsut run right thru get hit 5 times and be scott free, do that 10,000 times and thats lets say 50 dead vs like 5 or 6 with leathal rounds that are more effective at keeping them back anyways.
it's my D in a B
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 24,787
Likes: 1
From: Your Mom's House
Originally Posted by RB
The day the US government passes a law that allows border patrol to kill border hoppers is the day I get on my knees and suck your dick.
h:
I
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,525
Likes: 0
From: Westside til I die
Mine field ftw.
__________________
2015 Ford Mustang GT Fastback - Ingot Silver - 6M - Performance Package - Gibson Catback, JLT CAI, FR 47lb injectors, BAMA E85 tune, Eibach Sportline, BMR wheel hop kit, UPR oil separator, Steeda shifter bushing/bracket
Team B.O.B.® - Ballaz on a Budget
2015 Ford Mustang GT Fastback - Ingot Silver - 6M - Performance Package - Gibson Catback, JLT CAI, FR 47lb injectors, BAMA E85 tune, Eibach Sportline, BMR wheel hop kit, UPR oil separator, Steeda shifter bushing/bracket
Team B.O.B.® - Ballaz on a Budget
Thread Starter
un-Touch'd krew
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 51,774
Likes: 1
From: My own level of hell
Originally Posted by white_n_slow
Sure, maybe 0.5% come here wishing to do us harm. Does that justify killing the other 99.5%? Absolutely not. Yes, our border security isn't as tight as it should be. No, we are not justified in taking anybody's life for taking a swim in the Rio Grande.
One man after 9/11 tried to get ona plane with a bomb in his shoe to be ignited by a lighter he also posessed. We now have to have our shoes scanned and lighters of any sort are no longer allowed past security. All this because one passenger in the millions that fly monthly decided to be a bomber and got caught. So I am assuming this would be the .5% if even that much who changes the laws for everyone.
__________________
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."
snitches get stitches
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 49,696
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
Originally Posted by Nightshade
Sure it does and I will use the homeland securitys own line of reasoning to explain it clearly...
One man after 9/11 tried to get ona plane with a bomb in his shoe to be ignited by a lighter he also posessed. We now have to have our shoes scanned and lighters of any sort are no longer allowed past security. All this because one passenger in the millions that fly monthly decided to be a bomber and got caught. So I am assuming this would be the .5% if even that much who changes the laws for everyone.
One man after 9/11 tried to get ona plane with a bomb in his shoe to be ignited by a lighter he also posessed. We now have to have our shoes scanned and lighters of any sort are no longer allowed past security. All this because one passenger in the millions that fly monthly decided to be a bomber and got caught. So I am assuming this would be the .5% if even that much who changes the laws for everyone.
You're comparing scanning everone's shoes to killing people.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,257
Likes: 0
From: topton,pa
i cant believe they got all 1477lbs of my stash i asked those guys to get me 
but yea i agree with the shooting them idea. they're not supposed to be doing it and throwing them back to mexico doesn't do anything. non-lethal rounds would be a great idea, but live rounds would be even better :chuckles:
but yea i agree with the shooting them idea. they're not supposed to be doing it and throwing them back to mexico doesn't do anything. non-lethal rounds would be a great idea, but live rounds would be even better :chuckles:
it's my D in a B
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 24,787
Likes: 1
From: Your Mom's House
Originally Posted by Nightshade
Sure it does and I will use the homeland securitys own line of reasoning to explain it clearly...
One man after 9/11 tried to get ona plane with a bomb in his shoe to be ignited by a lighter he also posessed. We now have to have our shoes scanned and lighters of any sort are no longer allowed past security. All this because one passenger in the millions that fly monthly decided to be a bomber and got caught. So I am assuming this would be the .5% if even that much who changes the laws for everyone.
One man after 9/11 tried to get ona plane with a bomb in his shoe to be ignited by a lighter he also posessed. We now have to have our shoes scanned and lighters of any sort are no longer allowed past security. All this because one passenger in the millions that fly monthly decided to be a bomber and got caught. So I am assuming this would be the .5% if even that much who changes the laws for everyone.
it's my D in a B
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 24,787
Likes: 1
From: Your Mom's House
Originally Posted by 97civicEXVTEC
but yea i agree with the shooting them idea. they're not supposed to be doing it and throwing them back to mexico doesn't do anything.