Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Good vs Bad. my first political thread in a while

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 03:18 PM
  #51  
RB's Avatar
RB
snitches get stitches
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 49,696
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by redgoober4life
I know. Is it short for anything?

Jebbeth? Jebbasiah? Jebus? Jebule? Gosh what cruel parents. It's like naming your "Kentucky"
Jebbidiah...its an amish thing
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 03:37 PM
  #52  
ManInCamo's Avatar
ManInCamo
Thread Starter
Old School Crew
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 5,251
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MrFatbooty
Serbia was nothing like Iraq was. In Serbia we acted along with the rest of the world and ousted a dictator who was essentially universally condemned. In Iraq we acted unilaterally and got pledges of support after doing so, and our government justified the war to the public through obfuscation and misdirection.
Actually.... UN didn't do anything, and still tolerates a LOT of genocide aroudn the world.. NATO - US heading the way, said hey lets go.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 03:43 PM
  #53  
redgoober4life's Avatar
redgoober4life
I eat plastic.
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,177
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Default

And yet I wonder why Iraq is the target when there is so much genocide in the world.

Are we going to go to war all over the place. Surely if you're going to justify the reason of the war being genocide, then what makes the other dying people any different?
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 04:59 PM
  #54  
MrFatbooty's Avatar
MrFatbooty
Wannabe yuppie
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Default

Originally Posted by ManInCamo
Actually.... UN didn't do anything, and still tolerates a LOT of genocide aroudn the world.. NATO - US heading the way, said hey lets go.
I didn't say "UN." You did.

In Sebia we had some kind of treaty organization--NATO--involved. In Iraq we do not.

Serbia was a much smaller scale operation than Iraq. Serbia was a much more easily achievable goal. Serbia did not turn into a quagmire, and is instead now a relatively stable country.

There's absolutely no comparison.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 05:36 PM
  #55  
BonzoAPD's Avatar
BonzoAPD
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 16,353
Likes: 0
From: Ossining, New York
Default

Originally Posted by MrFatbooty
This is nothing more than a partisan rallying call written by someone who is comparing apples to oranges in order to make some kind of overall point that Bush is better than Clinton was. Aside from the pointlessness of comparing one current candidate to one former office holder, I will address a couple of the points.

Serbia was nothing like Iraq was. In Serbia we acted along with the rest of the world and ousted a dictator who was essentially universally condemned. In Iraq we acted unilaterally and got pledges of support after doing so, and our government justified the war to the public through obfuscation and misdirection.

Clinton's perjury and subsequent impeachment trial is its own thing and in no way parallels the "Mission Accomplished" snafu. But okay, the writer of this spam wants to make the latter seem less bad by comparing it to the (totally unrelated) former.

The stock market crashed in 2000 for a number of reasons, mainly the collapse of the dot-com bubble. Economic events aren't always tied to government. Republicans, what with all of their harping about government being too big, should be all too aware of that.
But the bad economy is tied to Bush as you have said time and time again huh
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 05:37 PM
  #56  
BonzoAPD's Avatar
BonzoAPD
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 16,353
Likes: 0
From: Ossining, New York
Default

Originally Posted by RB
Ironic how the original post claims Kerry never based his tax cut scenario off of facts, and yet the entire first 3/4ths of the post is...opinions.

Go figure.
A person running for office need to base his platform off of facts not opinions :slap:
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 05:55 PM
  #57  
MrFatbooty's Avatar
MrFatbooty
Wannabe yuppie
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Default

Originally Posted by BonzoAPD
But the bad economy is tied to Bush as you have said time and time again huh
I disagree with Bush's handling of the government's finances. Disagreeing with financial policy is not the same thing as saying the economy is bad and it's Bush's fault.

I do not believe in cutting taxes while raising spending. I do not believe in passing a Medicare bill which gives people a "discount" on drugs while raising their premiums and deductibles but makes the government spend more money to pay for those drugs because the premium and deductible increases are used to to give payouts to private health plans that only 1/10 of Medicare members are enrolled in. I do not believe in passing an bill which promises to pay for yet more needless standardized tests in K-12 schools and then sticks the local school districts with the bill. I do not believe in decreasing federal funding for public higher education institutions and expecting them to make up the difference through tuition hikes and alumni donations.

The list goes on.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 06:26 PM
  #58  
antarius's Avatar
antarius
Large Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,735
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

I do not agree with asking for world permission to protect my own country. Nor do I agree with asking for world acceptance after I do it.

That's really what my #1 priority is, the rest is all of lesser importance to me.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 07:05 PM
  #59  
MrFatbooty's Avatar
MrFatbooty
Wannabe yuppie
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Default

Originally Posted by antarius
I do not agree with asking for world permission to protect my own country. Nor do I agree with asking for world acceptance after I do it.
I love how Republicans always come back to that point of rhetorical nonsense.

When has any president, regardless of party, asked for permission from another country to go to war? There's a big difference between getting real allies on board, and "asking permission." Real allies add legitimacy to our position. Real allies help foot the bill in both troops and money.

What I want is for a president to only use war to defend the country as a last resort, and that's not what happened at all with Iraq.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 07:07 PM
  #60  
qtiger's Avatar
qtiger
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,776
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by antarius
I do not agree with asking for world permission to protect my own country. Nor do I agree with asking for world acceptance after I do it.
Defend our country... from what?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:19 AM.