View Poll Results: Why are you voting for Bush?
I hate freedom.
18
69.23%
I'm from Texas.
11
42.31%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll
To Bush supporters: A quick poll.
Eagles > NFL
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,225
Likes: 0
From: nj
Originally Posted by Jafro
Protecting the US is not a partisan issue. But if I were to vote on which 2004 party will do a better job at it, Kerry's straight out of the question. Remember how many military bases Clinton shut down? Remember how many JOBS were LOST as a result of that, despite how many he claims to have created? Remember how DEPLEATED and unprepared our armorys were when we needed them? Remember the laws BC passed that prevented us from building an arsenal of technological weapons that save American soldiers' lives? Now I'm not going to say that ALL democrats can't protect us from terrorism (ie: Jimmy Carter did just fine) - BUT - what the hell is Kerry going to do for us? What kind of foreign policy experience does he have? Do we need a strong defense after the attack our country has endured? I say hell yeah. Bush is the man, he's a leader, and I don't need a stinkin' hand-out, so piss on a democrat.
Large Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,735
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by Jafro
Protecting the US is not a partisan issue. But if I were to vote on which 2004 party will do a better job at it, Kerry's straight out of the question. Remember how many military bases Clinton shut down? Remember how many JOBS were LOST as a result of that, despite how many he claims to have created? Remember how DEPLEATED and unprepared our armorys were when we needed them? Remember the laws BC passed that prevented us from building an arsenal of technological weapons that save American soldiers' lives? Now I'm not going to say that ALL democrats can't protect us from terrorism (ie: Jimmy Carter did just fine) - BUT - what the hell is Kerry going to do for us? What kind of foreign policy experience does he have? Do we need a strong defense after the attack our country has endured? I say hell yeah. Bush is the man, he's a leader, and I don't need a stinkin' hand-out, so piss on a democrat.
Midwest Acurati
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
From: Middle America
Originally Posted by dE.fUsEd
on topic. i would vote for bush, atleast we know what to expect with him. kerry's a pussy anyways. :P
h:In other news... it's good to see that there are a lot more freedom-haters than Texans here.... whatever that means.
Wannabe yuppie
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Originally Posted by Jafro
Protecting the US is not a partisan issue.
I think this administration has willfully overexaggerated the terrorist threat for the main purpose of scaring the public into going along with its wacky right wing desires to start attacking other countries willy nilly and rescinding civil liberties. It's a pretty useful tactic, since so much of this country is already stuck with an us-against-them mentality.
Guess what folks? Terrorism has been around since way before Osama bin Laden was an itch in his daddy's groin. It just hasn't made it to U.S. soil until recently, and all of a sudden everybody's running scared and paranoid like it's the Cold War all over again.
I for one am sick of living in "fear," and this administration has done just as much if not more than the terrorists to foster that kind of sentiment in our country. Get rid of em.
Sinner
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,599
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
Originally Posted by MrFatbooty
Why assume that one particular issue is everyone's primary concern? Frankly, even if war hawks are supposedly better at fighting wars, they in my opinion screw up too many other things to just hand the reigns of the country over to them.
I think this administration has willfully overexaggerated the terrorist threat for the main purpose of scaring the public into going along with its wacky right wing desires to start attacking other countries willy nilly and rescinding civil liberties. It's a pretty useful tactic, since so much of this country is already stuck with an us-against-them mentality.
Guess what folks? Terrorism has been around since way before Osama bin Laden was an itch in his daddy's groin. It just hasn't made it to U.S. soil until recently, and all of a sudden everybody's running scared and paranoid like it's the Cold War all over again.
I for one am sick of living in "fear," and this administration has done just as much if not more than the terrorists to foster that kind of sentiment in our country. Get rid of em.
I think this administration has willfully overexaggerated the terrorist threat for the main purpose of scaring the public into going along with its wacky right wing desires to start attacking other countries willy nilly and rescinding civil liberties. It's a pretty useful tactic, since so much of this country is already stuck with an us-against-them mentality.
Guess what folks? Terrorism has been around since way before Osama bin Laden was an itch in his daddy's groin. It just hasn't made it to U.S. soil until recently, and all of a sudden everybody's running scared and paranoid like it's the Cold War all over again.
I for one am sick of living in "fear," and this administration has done just as much if not more than the terrorists to foster that kind of sentiment in our country. Get rid of em.
Love Is Suicide
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: New York
Originally Posted by MrFatbooty
Why assume that one particular issue is everyone's primary concern? Frankly, even if war hawks are supposedly better at fighting wars, they in my opinion screw up too many other things to just hand the reigns of the country over to them.
I think this administration has willfully overexaggerated the terrorist threat for the main purpose of scaring the public into going along with its wacky right wing desires to start attacking other countries willy nilly and rescinding civil liberties. It's a pretty useful tactic, since so much of this country is already stuck with an us-against-them mentality.
Guess what folks? Terrorism has been around since way before Osama bin Laden was an itch in his daddy's groin. It just hasn't made it to U.S. soil until recently, and all of a sudden everybody's running scared and paranoid like it's the Cold War all over again.
I for one am sick of living in "fear," and this administration has done just as much if not more than the terrorists to foster that kind of sentiment in our country. Get rid of em.
I think this administration has willfully overexaggerated the terrorist threat for the main purpose of scaring the public into going along with its wacky right wing desires to start attacking other countries willy nilly and rescinding civil liberties. It's a pretty useful tactic, since so much of this country is already stuck with an us-against-them mentality.
Guess what folks? Terrorism has been around since way before Osama bin Laden was an itch in his daddy's groin. It just hasn't made it to U.S. soil until recently, and all of a sudden everybody's running scared and paranoid like it's the Cold War all over again.
I for one am sick of living in "fear," and this administration has done just as much if not more than the terrorists to foster that kind of sentiment in our country. Get rid of em.
