Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

1500cc=1500 hp!!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 11:01 AM
  #1  
raiden571's Avatar
raiden571
Thread Starter
turning u inside out
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,545
Likes: 0
From: cortland, ohio
Default 1500cc=1500 hp!!!!!

i was goin thru my honda performance book today just reading p on turbos for the 100th time to see if i missed anything, and i must have over read the F1 racecar part. according to the book, F1 race cars used turbo charged 1500cc engines that put out 1500 hp and more. and i was like 'HUH?" i read it again before i crapped my self and thats what it said. the book also said that the motors before this were deamed unsafe due to TO MUCH POWER. if this is true, all i can say is holy shit and wow. maybe everyone else knew this and i didnt but i think that is just amazing. i would love to take one of those things a part to see what lets them put out so much power, aside from the turbo.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 11:03 AM
  #2  
b00gers's Avatar
b00gers
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 58,579
Likes: 0
From: Lll
Default

they rev to like 14k dont they?
__________________
.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 11:05 AM
  #3  
dom93hatch's Avatar
dom93hatch
more meat, more fire
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 28,251
Likes: 0
From: Orange, CA
Default

Yes, that is true.

Not only were the motors insanely powerful, but the cars were very light as well.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 11:05 AM
  #4  
dom93hatch's Avatar
dom93hatch
more meat, more fire
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 28,251
Likes: 0
From: Orange, CA
Default

Originally Posted by WiLL
they rev to like 14k dont they?

As of now, the average F1 engine revs to 18,500 rpm. In the last race, I spotted them shifting past 19,000 a couple times.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 11:06 AM
  #5  
raiden571's Avatar
raiden571
Thread Starter
turning u inside out
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,545
Likes: 0
From: cortland, ohio
Default

i want one for my dads wheel chair,that would be sweet
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 11:06 AM
  #6  
Epoch's Avatar
Epoch
CHRISTMASTIME IN IRAQ
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,413
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

I think I read somewhere that F1 cars also generate enough downforce to theoretically keep them glued to the track even if the track was flipped upside down?
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 11:07 AM
  #7  
dom93hatch's Avatar
dom93hatch
more meat, more fire
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 28,251
Likes: 0
From: Orange, CA
Default

True as well Aerodynamic grip is as much a part of the package as mechanical grip.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 11:09 AM
  #8  
clickwir's Avatar
clickwir
Floppy Death! noES!!!
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 21,218
Likes: 0
From: Scranton, PA
Default

Originally Posted by Epoch
I think I read somewhere that F1 cars also generate enough downforce to theoretically keep them glued to the track even if the track was flipped upside down?

Yup, I saw a chart one time that showed the downforce of an F1 racecar to be upwards of 7,000 pounds of downforce.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 11:09 AM
  #9  
Epoch's Avatar
Epoch
CHRISTMASTIME IN IRAQ
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,413
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by dom93hatch
True as well Aerodynamic grip is as much a part of the package as mechanical grip.
Then I vote we put barrel rolls into the F1 tracks.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 11:11 AM
  #10  
dom93hatch's Avatar
dom93hatch
more meat, more fire
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 28,251
Likes: 0
From: Orange, CA
Default

:eek3: That would rock so hard!!!!1 We should put loops too! Make them big enough so they don't scrape :happysad:
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:02 PM.