you have to think about it logically. one good giveaway is the fact that she was in an iraqi hospital. if she really had been attacked, why would the opposing side take her to a hospital and just torture her more, yet keep her alive? they could have just inished her off in the spot.

she was actually well cared for.

 

http://entertainment.msn.com/news/ar...px?news=139937

read that

 

heres an interesting read

http://www.shwa.org/topic/iraqwar/Je...Iraq_story.htm

 

POW's are SUPPOSED to be well taken care of.

POW's are not supposed to be raped and killed.

-ashley

 

yea something about war laws? :dunno:

 

no, the point is they said she was horribly mistreated at the hospital, but she wasn't.

 

yeah- i'm not an expert on that- Erik probably knows more about it than I do.

I just know that POW's are supposed to just be sorta detained during war. It is mandatory for them to recieve health care and food and shelter. They are not supposed to be abused.

 

sh!t happens, then you die.

 

You mean like those POWs we are holding indefinately in Guantanamo bay for interrogation?



By the way, it's the Geneva Convention that states proper treatment of POWs.

 

The only reason Ms. Lynch's story is know is because of the media. They over-hyped the whole thing and we asked for more. If we didn't we would have moved on to the next "story". Unfortunately not everyone's story can be told, it's just about physically impossible. Her story was "picked" and that's the truth.