S2K or Nissan Z

Closed Thread Subscribe

Thread Tools

Mar 22, 2005 | 06:55 PM

#31

prelood

Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2004

Posts: 1,564

Likes: 0

From: nashKILL

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRfrank

wait... i thought they upgraded to the k24 or suttin for the s2k now.

just checked, its a 2.2 liter, whats the engine code, it's not a RWD h22 is it??

( we all know the DOHC f20 was a h series in disguise)

:rofl:

s2k :thumbup:

Mar 23, 2005 | 10:32 AM

#32

Dave-ROR

RAD owns.

Joined: Feb 2004

Posts: 613

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by gingas

I would go w/ the s for looks etc. It depends also do you want a Honda or Nissan. Value wise S because H's hold better value.

Uhmm a few Nissan products have very good resale. The G35 is one of the best in the industry. The 350Z is very very good as well. Generalized statements on resale are worthless, especially when you are wrong.

Quote:

Of course Z is faster 287 hp vs 240.Gas mileage the S(4cyl) especially w/ the gas prices today.

AP2 S2k's do the 1320 in 13.9. 350Z Track editions do 14.1 in C&D (the only one I had a listing for here). Fuel economy on the S2k is 20/25 while the 350Z is 20/26.

Please avoid misinformation.

Mar 23, 2005 | 10:58 AM

#33

thomas

pew pew pew

Joined: Jan 2005

Posts: 6,437

Likes: 0

From: teh az

i say get a z, they repond well to mods and look really nice imo

Mar 23, 2005 | 11:39 AM

#34

nVz

Registered User

Joined: Dec 2002

Posts: 11

Likes: 0

S2K all the way!

Apr 15, 2005 | 04:14 PM

#35

drew935

Laguna Seca circuit

Joined: Jul 2002

Posts: 228

Likes: 0

From: San Jose

I prefer the 350z. I like the torque. Driving my 240 feels like I'm boosting compared to when I drive my civic which feels like a rev happy monster...hehe