Notices

S2K or Nissan Z

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 08:56 AM
  #11  
sherwood's Avatar
sherwood
I missed Sean
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,285
Likes: 1
From: Fairfield/Bridgeport CT
Default

Originally Posted by Project_ITR
a K series S2000? riiiiiiiiiiiiight...u need to stay off that shit
wait... i thought they upgraded to the k24 or suttin for the s2k now.

just checked, its a 2.2 liter, whats the engine code, it's not a RWD h22 is it??

( we all know the DOHC f20 was a h series in disguise)
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 10:26 AM
  #12  
FLAT_LINER's Avatar
FLAT_LINER
Ridin Dirty
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,839
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte,NC
Default

Originally Posted by DRfrank
wait... i thought they upgraded to the k24 or suttin for the s2k now.

just checked, its a 2.2 liter, whats the engine code, it's not a RWD h22 is it??

( we all know the DOHC f20 was a h series in disguise)
my god son where are you getting your info?....
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 11:51 AM
  #13  
sherwood's Avatar
sherwood
I missed Sean
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,285
Likes: 1
From: Fairfield/Bridgeport CT
Default

Originally Posted by FLAT_LINER
my god son where are you getting your info?....
dunno, i thought i read somewhere it was a 2.4 and figured that they just upgraded it to a modified k series :exnbp: bad intrepretation of a bad typo
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 06:53 PM
  #14  
98CoupeV6's Avatar
98CoupeV6
lots and lots of fail
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 23,004
Likes: 1
From: Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeetroit
Default

Originally Posted by DRfrank
wait... i thought they upgraded to the k24 or suttin for the s2k now.

just checked, its a 2.2 liter, whats the engine code, it's not a RWD h22 is it??

( we all know the DOHC f20 was a h series in disguise)
Um read a story or two about the F20C, it had little if anything in common with the H series. Completely different block, chain driven, direct ignition, FRM cylinder walls, etc etc etc.

And it's an F22C. K series is FWD.
Old Jan 24, 2005 | 09:19 AM
  #15  
Dave-ROR's Avatar
Dave-ROR
RAD owns.
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 98CoupeV6
Which is better? Why don't you drive them and find out. They're totally different cars built for a totally different type of car buyer. How can we tell you which car will be better for you?
Exactly. Drive both, then decide. Our personal opinions of what's better for US are worthless for you.
Old Jan 24, 2005 | 07:15 PM
  #16  
ED9man's Avatar
ED9man
driver
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,600
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 98CoupeV6
WTF are you talking about?
:werd:
Old Jan 24, 2005 | 09:37 PM
  #17  
Josh M's Avatar
Josh M
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,124
Likes: 0
Default

I'd t ake the 350z over the S2k..........way more fun to drive and i like the added torque
Old Jan 24, 2005 | 09:50 PM
  #18  
llxzxll's Avatar
llxzxll
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Default

NISSIAN! hahahaha.
Old Jan 25, 2005 | 07:39 AM
  #19  
Dave-ROR's Avatar
Dave-ROR
RAD owns.
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by xsentrixsupra
I'd t ake the 350z over the S2k..........way more fun to drive and i like the added torque
Interesting. I'm with you on the torque, way way lost on the fun to drive part. Yeah the 350Z was fun, but in my opinion the S2000 is far more fun to drive and is by far the better "driver's car".

Of course, none of this matters to the guy who posted the thread.
Old Jan 25, 2005 | 01:43 PM
  #20  
AP2's Avatar
AP2
Moderator Alumni
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 20,789
Likes: 1
Default

If you want the car for a pure driving experience that benefits you the most, get the S.

If you want the car that you plan on modifying, then get the Z.

It seems you're in the period where you want to be the "top dog" out of your peers, if all you care about is straight-line performance...look into those AWD cars, Mustang, and the like.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:13 PM.