Acura TSX Final Specs and Pictures
forever lurking
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,392
Likes: 0
From: El Monte, CA
Originally posted by AcuraFanatic
Decent article. I don't know why people complain about 162 lb.-ft. of torque when you have 2400cc to work with. Seems fine for me.
Decent article. I don't know why people complain about 162 lb.-ft. of torque when you have 2400cc to work with. Seems fine for me.
HC Racer H5
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
From: KCK
Found a Bunch of TSX Reviews
MSN: http://autos.msn.com/vip/job.aspx?make=Acura&model=TSX
USA Today: http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/...4-24-tsx_x.htm
Winnepeg Free Press: http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/aut...-1110027c.html
Chicago Sun Times: http://www.suntimes.com/output/auto/car-news-car27.html
World of Wheels: http://www.wheels.ca/Reviews.htm?CD=191&ID=2002
USA Today: http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/...4-24-tsx_x.htm
Winnepeg Free Press: http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/aut...-1110027c.html
Chicago Sun Times: http://www.suntimes.com/output/auto/car-news-car27.html
World of Wheels: http://www.wheels.ca/Reviews.htm?CD=191&ID=2002
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
From: Oceanside, CA
Here's Motor Week road test:
http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2235a.shtml
0-60 = 7.6 sec.
1/4 mile = 15.9 sec.
This is the 6MT model. Disappointing to say the least.
http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2235a.shtml
0-60 = 7.6 sec.
1/4 mile = 15.9 sec.
This is the 6MT model. Disappointing to say the least.
VEETEHK
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
From: S. Carolina
Originally posted by asianautica
Here's Motor Week road test:
http://speed.supercars.net/cboardpic...-4/368598a.jpg
0-60 = 7.6 sec.
1/4 mile = 15.9 sec.
This is the 6MT model. Disappointing to say the least.
Here's Motor Week road test:
http://speed.supercars.net/cboardpic...-4/368598a.jpg
0-60 = 7.6 sec.
1/4 mile = 15.9 sec.
This is the 6MT model. Disappointing to say the least.
I'm think it'll be closer to 6.8s or 6.9s.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
From: Frisco, Texas
Originally posted by asianautica
Here's Motor Week road test:
http://speed.supercars.net/cboardpic...-4/368598a.jpg
0-60 = 7.6 sec.
1/4 mile = 15.9 sec.
This is the 6MT model. Disappointing to say the least.
Here's Motor Week road test:
http://speed.supercars.net/cboardpic...-4/368598a.jpg
0-60 = 7.6 sec.
1/4 mile = 15.9 sec.
This is the 6MT model. Disappointing to say the least.
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
From: Oceanside, CA
Originally posted by yianni64
You wish that link was the TSX.
You wish that link was the TSX.
http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2235a.shtml
Toyota Racing = Cheaters
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,536
Likes: 0
Originally posted by asianautica
Hhehe, my bad. I wish that car is here in the US too... but I edited it w/ the correct link. Here it is:
http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2235a.shtml
Hhehe, my bad. I wish that car is here in the US too... but I edited it w/ the correct link. Here it is:
http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2235a.shtml
BLAH! There's something up with Motorweek's testing. I mean, their 03 Accord V6 testing got 0-60mph @ 8.0 second, when other reviews has consistantly achieved 6.7-7.3 seconds. 8.0 seconds is the same time they achieved in the less hp, similar weight 98 Accord V6. Something's not right.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
is a 15.9 SOOOO bad? 
give me a freakin break. i dont know what you guys expected it to do with only 200 hp. its not a civic you know. im sure some people will get better times, but 15.9 is to be expected.
PS what did disappoint me was the mileage. 21 mpg city? how could this be?
give me a freakin break. i dont know what you guys expected it to do with only 200 hp. its not a civic you know. im sure some people will get better times, but 15.9 is to be expected.
PS what did disappoint me was the mileage. 21 mpg city? how could this be?
