Acura TSX Final Specs and Pictures
Thread Starter
lots and lots of fail
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 23,004
Likes: 1
From: Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeetroit
Originally posted by 99AccordCoupe
The Mercedes C230 sedan isn't bad. Nicely optioned it's no more than $33K. But MB has quality issues as well. Got to make some time for that test drive.
The Mercedes C230 sedan isn't bad. Nicely optioned it's no more than $33K. But MB has quality issues as well. Got to make some time for that test drive.
Having messed around today in a new 4 cyl Camry, Subaru Outback 2.5 and a 6 cyl Mustang (renters)....I have one thing to say, its all about delivery.
The Stang despite having the biggest and more powerful engine of the bunch was the slowest and most raucous. Biggest piece of junk. Rough running, shifting and noisy. (BTW handling is not as bad as people make it out to be....RWD is nice)
The subie is smooth but lacks grunt.
The camry with the smallest engine of the bunch was silky and surprisingly powerful. The new K24 in the accord is almost exactly the same as the camry 2.4 in terms of smoothness and available power, but it feels slightly gutsier than the camry. So now imagine have 200 hp with the same kind of delivery, gotta be sweet.....
What I'm say is drive the cars before you make a final decision, you may be surprised.
noel
The Stang despite having the biggest and more powerful engine of the bunch was the slowest and most raucous. Biggest piece of junk. Rough running, shifting and noisy. (BTW handling is not as bad as people make it out to be....RWD is nice)
The subie is smooth but lacks grunt.
The camry with the smallest engine of the bunch was silky and surprisingly powerful. The new K24 in the accord is almost exactly the same as the camry 2.4 in terms of smoothness and available power, but it feels slightly gutsier than the camry. So now imagine have 200 hp with the same kind of delivery, gotta be sweet.....
What I'm say is drive the cars before you make a final decision, you may be surprised.
noel
You're considering a 1.8l 4 banger but don't like the TSX because its a 2.4l 4 banger?
Horsepower: 189 hp @ 5,800 rpm
Torque: 192 lb-ft @ 3,500 - 4,000 rpm
Thread Starter
lots and lots of fail
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 23,004
Likes: 1
From: Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeetroit
Originally posted by 99AccordCoupe
I'm considering the Mercedes 230 sedan because it has a supercharger and actually has torque.
Horsepower: 189 hp @ 5,800 rpm
Torque: 192 lb-ft @ 3,500 - 4,000 rpm
I'm considering the Mercedes 230 sedan because it has a supercharger and actually has torque.
Horsepower: 189 hp @ 5,800 rpm
Torque: 192 lb-ft @ 3,500 - 4,000 rpm
Not to compare apples and oranges (but what the hell), I don't think many people have given the new Maxima enough credit to be an alternative to the TSX. The 3.5SL has pretty much everything the TSX has (and more) for an additional 2k. The Maxima is not only quicker, larger in the interior, and it probably handles just as well (actually drove the Maxima - very nice, waiting on TSX). When it comes down to it, the TSX is beginning to look less and less like a bargain, although I'll admit it beats the pants out of all the bottom-barrel 325 and 1.8t A4s.
Have you driven it? The engine is very lackluster IMO.



