Ok guys this is my question. Im going to be buying a car for about 5-8grand and i was wondering if i would be better off getting a newer LS and turboing in a few months or getting a GS-R and gradually doing mods. I guess insurance on an LS would be cheaper and i will be more able to find a nice LS because GSR's are so dam rare. What are your opinions. Please give me costs of LS, years, and the cost of turbo + supporting mods. Thanks in advance.

Ben

 

No one?

 

gsr's are out there, but the insurance is cheaper on ls, my ls is blue booking around 6-8000.00 stock with high mileage, no idea what i could get for it with mods. as far as turbo pricing i'm not real sure of, aprox. 2-3000.00 for the kits i've spec'ed, like my ls but i would go gsr if possible http://ouw1sh.com/php/modules.php?op...orderby=titleA

 

NO do LS TURBO i am about to go turbo in mine i bought it only for the nonvtec and turboing!
www.cardomain.com/id/nixonteg

 

I think i may go LS. Is there much difference other then engine specs between the two?

 

Save up and turbo the GSR. But whatever u do, be sure to research and do it right the first time since car stuff can get pretty damn expensive

 

no ls is a MUCH better set up for the turbo **** gsrturbo LSTURBO

 

Why is LS better then a GSR if i want to go turbo. Wouldn't the gsr be better? I heard soemthing about the drive train being weaker on a gsr or something. Is that why. Thanks,

Ben

 

Mind telling me why Nixon?

 

because LS block is so much better torque wise. no vtec bulshit kicking in. ls block is all out torque