Notices

what do u think i will run

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 24, 2003 | 03:32 PM
  #11  
pomansouth's Avatar
pomansouth
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
From: montgomery alabama
Default

aight man thanx alot
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2003 | 08:17 AM
  #12  
GSRGuy17's Avatar
GSRGuy17
Da GS-R Dood
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default

well, considering I ran 14.97 @ 93.82 in my stock GSR, I'd say mid 14s... maybe low 14s if you're REALLY good.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2003 | 09:47 AM
  #13  
tooslow2race's Avatar
tooslow2race
Master Bator
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: in front of you
Default

I just don't understand the point of spending $3000-4000 to run 14's???? Maybe it's just me :dunno:
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2003 | 10:54 AM
  #14  
bottlenose's Avatar
bottlenose
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Default

its better then slappin a turbo on. because turbo is more meintenence and forced induction on a stock engine will make your engine turn to shXt faster then you think. Building up the head is the first step im taking,eventually i will build the block. I dont think i will ever do forced induction simply because of the damage it can do.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2003 | 04:27 PM
  #15  
tooslow2race's Avatar
tooslow2race
Master Bator
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: in front of you
Default

Originally posted by bottlenose
its better then slappin a turbo on.
For speed? you're kidding right? obviously it will be more prone to problems, but with proper tuning and a good fuel management it can be quite reliable


because turbo is more meintenence and forced induction on a stock engine will make your engine turn to shXt faster then you think. Building up the head is the first step im taking,eventually i will build the block. I dont think i will ever do forced induction simply because of the damage it can do.
n/a is cool if that's what you're all about, but the lack of torque will own you... and you're building up a non-vtec which also hurts (ls/vtec perhaps?)


Anyways, I was trying to start **** or talk **** on your setup, we're all after the same goals more or less. I was thinking of going n/a when i was deciding on what to do, but i read enough posts, and talked to enough tuners and i finally decided on boost. Possibly not the best way to keep my car reliable, but you only live once and i love the feeling of getting thrown back into my seat whenever i punch it, and if i would have gone n/a, i'd still be $1000's away from that feeling
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2003 | 05:15 PM
  #16  
94tegAddict's Avatar
94tegAddict
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: MD
Default

Originally posted by MrFatBooty
I'd say about a 14.8-14.9 with a trap speed in the low 90's. You'll have about the same peak output as a GSR with i/h/e but at a lower RPM and with longer gearing.
i agree...
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2003 | 07:03 PM
  #17  
bottlenose's Avatar
bottlenose
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Default

My "Theory" on my engine set up is this..... since the block builds power down in the lower rpms more then that of a gsr per say and declines / loses power as RPMs rise. The intake manifold and headers exhuast and pulleys will help me gain the power up at the top. When building the head of the engine up with crower stage II cams and valve springs it will naturally give me more power, also i will need to move the rev limiter back to around 8500- 9000 because the motor will now be able to create power past stock specs, the valve springs are designed to handle high rpms. I plan on adjusting the cam gears to give me the most power in low-mid range how ever.... this may sound odd but the power needed for the higher RPMS will already be available because of the entire upgraded intake/exhaust system. Its hard to understand i know but let me know what you think.
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:38 PM.