Notices

195/50/15 as opposed to 205/50/15?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 09:48 AM
  #1  
ur31337's Avatar
ur31337
Thread Starter
Colby
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,150
Likes: 0
From: Southeastern CT
Default 195/50/15 as opposed to 205/50/15?

I was over at H-T and I saw that a lot of the Type-R guys ended up running a 195/50/15. I was confused, because I've never heard of anyone doing that.

Wouldn't that throw the speedo off even more? The stock tire is 107.25 mm tall, the 205/50 is 102.5, and the 195/50 is 97.5

The reasoning I got was because they are cheaper than the others, but are there any drawbacks? I just realized that a Potenza S-03 is $114 in 205/50 but $79 in 195/50.

Good thing taxes are coming!
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2003 | 06:15 AM
  #2  
JonD's Avatar
JonD
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Default

I would imagine, price is the main factor......
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2003 | 08:02 PM
  #3  
01ITR177's Avatar
01ITR177
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: georgia
Default

i just put a set of S0-3's 195-50-15 on my ITR and i have no complaints yet, actually, i love them!
and if i remember correctly the stock tire size is 195-55-15 w/ the potenza re010 ...... i went to a 50 series to keep the tires scrubbing the fender wells..
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2003 | 07:50 AM
  #4  
ur31337's Avatar
ur31337
Thread Starter
Colby
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,150
Likes: 0
From: Southeastern CT
Default

Well, if cost is the main factor, I would imagine a performance increase/decrease is negligible?

I know going from 195/55/15 to 205/50/15 felt VERY different.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 10:33 AM
  #5  
BonzoAPD's Avatar
BonzoAPD
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 16,353
Likes: 0
From: Ossining, New York
Default

looks like price is the issue but I would be weary of doing that change
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 10:54 AM
  #6  
ur31337's Avatar
ur31337
Thread Starter
Colby
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,150
Likes: 0
From: Southeastern CT
Default

Yea, I'm totally NOT doing it.

After talking with FatBooty, I've decided to stick with a 205/50. He suggested going with the Falken Azeni Sports, $68 per tire is NIIICE

I really want to stick with S-03s, but I'm looking at $489 shipped. Then I have to get them mounted, so unless my local tire guy can work some magic, Falken it is.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 02:36 PM
  #7  
newgsrdriver's Avatar
newgsrdriver
Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 0
From: Philly & MD
Default

Azenis BLOW in standing water...if you live anywhere where it rains hard, consider your car useless. I wouldnt get Azenis' for that fact.

Id rather go with 195/50 S03's than Azenis'. Nevermind they dont last long. Or hell, why not SP5000's, or Kumhos, or T1-S, etc etc.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2003 | 04:19 PM
  #8  
kabob's Avatar
kabob
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Land of Steers and Queers :o
Default

You wouldn't be using the Azenis as a daily driving tire. They are completely designed around racing in the dry and offer very little tread life and *no* all-season capability. Anyone using Azenis should be wrapping them around a seperate set of rims and leaving them for track duty only.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2003 | 04:32 PM
  #9  
ur31337's Avatar
ur31337
Thread Starter
Colby
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,150
Likes: 0
From: Southeastern CT
Default

Well, I'm glad Mike let me know THAT aspect. I was wondering how that tread would displace water. *SMACK!*

Oi, back to spending stoopid money on tires.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2003 | 04:54 PM
  #10  
kabob's Avatar
kabob
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Land of Steers and Queers :o
Default

lol, that's why I'm waiting on Azenis until I can afford a seperate set of rims to mount them on :thumbup:
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:51 PM.