Notices

Concerning ls/vtec head gasket?????

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 17, 2005 | 06:47 AM
  #11  
ISP James's Avatar
ISP James
DAMIMRED
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 13,495
Likes: 0
From: Syracuse, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Kai
What's the point of having any other gasket size then 81mm anyway? All the B heads have 81mm combustion chambers and an extra 1/4cc of gasket material isn't going to significantly alter the combustion chamber volume or flow profile of the engine. :thinking:

if you bore your cylinders out, you will need a larger headgasket :dunno:
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2005 | 03:31 PM
  #12  
dubcac's Avatar
dubcac
I
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,525
Likes: 0
From: Westside til I die
Default

Originally Posted by Kai
What's the point of having any other gasket size then 81mm anyway? All the B heads have 81mm combustion chambers and an extra 1/4cc of gasket material isn't going to significantly alter the combustion chamber volume or flow profile of the engine. :thinking:
Incorrect. There is one version of the B20 head that has an 84mm combustion chamber. Using a smaller headgasket than your bore size will raise compression, and it WILL alter the flow inside the cylinder...especially in high comp. or boosted applications.
__________________
2015 Ford Mustang GT Fastback - Ingot Silver - 6M - Performance Package - Gibson Catback, JLT CAI, FR 47lb injectors, BAMA E85 tune, Eibach Sportline, BMR wheel hop kit, UPR oil separator, Steeda shifter bushing/bracket
Team B.O.B.® - Ballaz on a Budget
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2005 | 03:52 PM
  #13  
Kai's Avatar
Kai
Rotorphile.
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 10,120
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Master Yodub
Incorrect. There is one version of the B20 head that has an 84mm combustion chamber.
Well, yeah, I can understand using one on that oddball head, but how often do you see those?

For the others with the standard 81mm combustion chamber, it just seems like something super-obsessive. What's the average displacement of a B-series combustion chamber (say, a PR3,) anyway?
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2005 | 04:03 PM
  #14  
dubcac's Avatar
dubcac
I
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,525
Likes: 0
From: Westside til I die
Default

Originally Posted by Kai
Well, yeah, I can understand using one on that oddball head, but how often do you see those?

For the others with the standard 81mm combustion chamber, it just seems like something super-obsessive. What's the average displacement of a B-series combustion chamber (say, a PR3,) anyway?
Well if you overbore the cylinders, you'd go with an overbored headgasket to match. It's not the change in displacement that matters, its the fact that you are going to have material all the way around the circumference of the cylinder disrupting flow as it enters the cylinders from the head, and as the pistons compress it, and as it exits the head. The edge of the gasket in the cylinder will cause a turbulent flow inside the cylinder.

Also, it's a common practice for people who go with an overbore to have the combustion chambers bored to match as well.
__________________
2015 Ford Mustang GT Fastback - Ingot Silver - 6M - Performance Package - Gibson Catback, JLT CAI, FR 47lb injectors, BAMA E85 tune, Eibach Sportline, BMR wheel hop kit, UPR oil separator, Steeda shifter bushing/bracket
Team B.O.B.® - Ballaz on a Budget
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2005 | 04:11 PM
  #15  
pomansouth's Avatar
pomansouth
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
From: montgomery alabama
Default

still off topic, but wouldnt boring out the cylinder head, lower the compression. Now if you go out and spend all of that money on high comp pistons and add a few more cc's to the head, whats the point. it seems the only way to bore the head and keep stock cc is to mill the head... just creates a money hole, or so it seems.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2005 | 04:18 PM
  #16  
Snoopy's Avatar
Snoopy
been there done that
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 30,637
Likes: 0
From: 916
Default

yes spotfacing the head to match the bore does lower the compression
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:24 PM.