Notices
Engine Swaps, Tech & Tuning Swaps, N/A Performance, Forced Induction, Engine Management, & Troubleshooting

what types of engine these honda make.

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 11:03 PM
  #11  
raiden571's Avatar
raiden571
turning u inside out
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,545
Likes: 0
From: cortland, ohio
Default

im not gonna ardue with someone that make shalf the horsepwoer for twice the cost
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 11:05 PM
  #12  
bambbrose's Avatar
bambbrose
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,881
Likes: 0
From: Utah
Default

Originally Posted by raiden571
im not gonna ardue with someone that make shalf the horsepwoer for twice the cost

there is a lot more to it than horsepower

respect comes to mind
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 09:56 PM
  #13  
raiden571's Avatar
raiden571
turning u inside out
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,545
Likes: 0
From: cortland, ohio
Default

Originally Posted by bambbrose
there is a lot more to it than horsepower

respect comes to mind
to each his own i guess. i just like the feeling of getting slammed into the seat
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 11:28 PM
  #14  
Provocateur's Avatar
Provocateur
On permanent hiatus
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,716
Likes: 0
From: A forum with actual tech
Default

Oh god, not this N/A versus turbo bullshit again. Just remember:

Attached Images
File Type: bmp
boostgetsyoulaid.bmp (66.0 KB, 104 views)
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 09:45 AM
  #15  
1995civicex's Avatar
1995civicex
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Tri-Cities, WA
Default

Another thing to remember is that torque is what moves the car and what you feel. It is very hard to make a NA 2.4L have as much torque as any turbo setup.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 08:56 AM
  #16  
IntegraType-R's Avatar
IntegraType-R
ALL MOTOR KING
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by bambbrose
although very expensive, the power per dollar ratio really isn't that much worse than that of a b18c5 in stock form. once you add cams and whatnot you are making more power than b18c5's can reliably
LMFAO OH OPK~!! not really dude..c5's are reliably and in fact, to be honest i think k series is crap and overrated,
I've seen stock STOCK c5's go 180-190whp depending on condition i really haven't seen any dyno's for the k20 just in stock form but its mostly been upper 190ish with i/h/e i can tell u this u can do the same thing to a c5 thatu can to a k... infact both motors have their good and bad, am a type-r lover and of course i'm goin to lean towards the c5, however k's have their pros but dont take it to that level cause, right now with a fully built head, and major bolt ons i'm putting down some good power... so its all in opinion, if u got the money k20 if ur ok with spending aload of money to be fast.... c5 if itu can afford it too it reactes just as well to anything as a k20 would.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 10:54 AM
  #17  
bambbrose's Avatar
bambbrose
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,881
Likes: 0
From: Utah
Default

Originally Posted by IntegraType-R
LMFAO OH OPK~!! not really dude..c5's are reliably and in fact, to be honest i think k series is crap and overrated,
I've seen stock STOCK c5's go 180-190whp depending on condition i really haven't seen any dyno's for the k20 just in stock form but its mostly been upper 190ish with i/h/e i can tell u this u can do the same thing to a c5 thatu can to a k... infact both motors have their good and bad, am a type-r lover and of course i'm goin to lean towards the c5, however k's have their pros but dont take it to that level cause, right now with a fully built head, and major bolt ons i'm putting down some good power... so its all in opinion, if u got the money k20 if ur ok with spending aload of money to be fast.... c5 if itu can afford it too it reactes just as well to anything as a k20 would.

that is peak numbers only.

Compare the torque curves and the overall power of a K to a c5 and you will be suprised.

That is why they are so fast.

Torque comes on early and stays much much higher than the C5, and topend on a k20a peaks at about 210-220whp tuned.

190whp on a k20a is ridiculously low, although about right for a k20a2
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 12:43 PM
  #18  
mr.crx's Avatar
mr.crx
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 0
From: phoenix, az
Default

i would say it is just by preference between k series. personally i dont know i have only ridden in cars with a b series in it. so i you should go ridde in a car with a k series in it with some mods and one with a b series to be able to make a decision
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 04:30 PM
  #19  
97civicEXVTEC's Avatar
97civicEXVTEC
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,257
Likes: 0
From: topton,pa
Default

k series > b series
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 08:16 PM
  #20  
Provocateur's Avatar
Provocateur
On permanent hiatus
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,716
Likes: 0
From: A forum with actual tech
Default

Originally Posted by bambbrose
that is peak numbers only.

Compare the torque curves and the overall power of a K to a c5 and you will be suprised.

That is why they are so fast.

Torque comes on early and stays much much higher than the C5, and topend on a k20a peaks at about 210-220whp tuned.

190whp on a k20a is ridiculously low, although about right for a k20a2
Check out the torque curve on this huge boosted K24: http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1468868

The torque comes on by 3000 rpms, peaks at 4800 rpms, and then falls back rather poorly all the way to redline. I have never seen a torque curve like this before, so the pros or cons of it in a drag race would be interesting to see.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:24 PM.