Notices
Engine Swaps, Tech & Tuning Swaps, N/A Performance, Forced Induction, Engine Management, & Troubleshooting

what ratio would you recomend turbo b16a1

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-31-2005, 05:13 PM
  #11  
olly-civic
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
olly-civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by b16ahybrid
What are the specs of the turbo?
9.6:1 gets my vote esp if your running a t3t4 and looking to make some decent power.
its:
T3/T4 Hybrid

T04e Stage III Wheel

.50 a/r
.63 Exhaust
Old 01-31-2005, 05:29 PM
  #12  
b16ahybrid
Senior Member
 
b16ahybrid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by olly-civic
its:
T3/T4 Hybrid

T04e Stage III Wheel

.50 a/r
.63 Exhaust

Here's my .02 cents.
I wouldn't recomend lowering your compression that much. I have a turbo thats close to the one your using but mines a .57 trim w/.63 a/r.
If your looking to make 300whp it's going to take about 13psi with an agressive tune. Thats with stock compression. I'm making about 280whp with a mild tune, stock compression, and 13psi.
That turbo will compliment your set-up nicely, but I would honestly keep the compression higher then 8.5:1.
Old 01-31-2005, 05:39 PM
  #13  
olly-civic
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
olly-civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so you think the 9.0:1 would be better?
Old 01-31-2005, 08:43 PM
  #14  
westcoaststyle
Still here... sorta...
 
westcoaststyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: CO
Posts: 17,177
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I say go 9.5. No way go 8.5:1.

Those injectors are not very well priced. Check it out: http://www.wiredspeed.com/itemdesc.a...%2D550&eq=&Tp=
Old 01-31-2005, 09:09 PM
  #15  
BoostedITR41
Senior Member
 
BoostedITR41's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

compression has nothing to do with spool up guys it is all gearing. the flow of other parts other than the turbo will be what makes power it isn't all boost.

300BHP you should need no more than a bar of boost ona good tune.
Old 02-01-2005, 12:53 PM
  #16  
b16ahybrid
Senior Member
 
b16ahybrid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BoostedITR41
compression has nothing to do with spool up guys it is all gearing. the flow of other parts other than the turbo will be what makes power it isn't all boost.

300BHP you should need no more than a bar of boost ona good tune.
I'm not talking about spool-up, Spool with that turbo will not be a probem.
It's going to take him more boost to make the same amount of hp. running 8.5:1 compression with an agressive tune will require about 16psi of boost. Now if he were to bump the compression to 9.5:1 or even 10.0:1 with the same tune it's going to take about 12-13psi of boost. Why do I even mention that, well without looking at that specific turbo's flow chart, I believe that turbo's peak isnt that high. Once you cross the turbo's peak it's your going to start to introduce more and more heat into the boost charge.
So whats better running more boost with higher heat or running lower boost with less heat and making the same power.
Like I said before, i'm running a simular turbo, inorder to reach my goal of about 400whp it's going to take a higher static compression to keep the turbo close to it's peak efficiency. And yes compression does effect the final outcome. Nobody is mentioning spool-up, not sure why your stuck on that.
Old 02-01-2005, 05:14 PM
  #17  
olly-civic
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
olly-civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i carnt do a 10:1 it wouldnt be right in the back of my head!!!
im getting the pistons on friday iv gone for the 9.5:1, iv also been offered a aquamist water/methanol injection kit, the pupme gas over here has a 98 octane rating, am i correct in saying that with the water/methanol mix being injected the octane would be higher or am i on the rong track???

also any thoughts on that intake manifold i found??? is it worth it?
Old 02-01-2005, 05:46 PM
  #18  
b16ahybrid
Senior Member
 
b16ahybrid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by olly-civic
i carnt do a 10:1 it wouldnt be right in the back of my head!!!
im getting the pistons on friday iv gone for the 9.5:1, iv also been offered a aquamist water/methanol injection kit, the pupme gas over here has a 98 octane rating, am i correct in saying that with the water/methanol mix being injected the octane would be higher or am i on the rong track???

also any thoughts on that intake manifold i found??? is it worth it?
I'm running 10.2:1 compression w/almost 1 bar of boost (13-14psi) runs like a champ. Bone stock and it's making about 280whp.
Don't run more octane then you need, running 98 octane isn't going to be required for your set-up. If your only looking for about 300hp then 92 octane will be more then enough.
Old 02-01-2005, 08:16 PM
  #19  
westcoaststyle
Still here... sorta...
 
westcoaststyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: CO
Posts: 17,177
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I agree. In CO we have 91 and that's all I run. I've never put race gas in it...

The injection system would be cool, but overkill for what you want to do. I'm interested in an injection kit, but I really need to know more about it before I commit.
Old 02-02-2005, 09:52 AM
  #20  
olly-civic
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
olly-civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

u carnt get 92 in the uk its 95 or 98, thats all you can get.....




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:45 AM.