"I'll beat him with aerodynamics!"
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Originally Posted by Nathan1234
Correct. This new car is the Integra, and only in the US did they call it something different.
Your stupidity is blowing my mind. Your argument is that, even though in Japan (where they make these cars) the Honda Integra line has been unbroken and Honda has chosen to sell the new generation Integra to US buyers under the RSX name, this RSX is somehow a replacement to the Integra? So, if Honda designed the next generation NSX for sale in Japan and the rest of the world, but decided to sell it as the "ass-rapist" in the US, you would then claim that the "ass-rapist" was a replacement for the NSX, and not the same car? Do you understand how f&%king stupid that is, or maybe wonder why you are the only idiot here who thinks this way?
Trust me... you have no f#*king clue.
Well, obviously you DO need help finding the important information in this article.
You KEEP SAYING that the RSX is somehow aerodynamically inferior to the Integra....
Why don't you just put down the keyboard and walk away. It doesn't seem as though you have anything useful to provide. Can't you see that as of right now, you are the only person that believes you are right about anything?
Your stupidity is blowing my mind. Your argument is that, even though in Japan (where they make these cars) the Honda Integra line has been unbroken and Honda has chosen to sell the new generation Integra to US buyers under the RSX name, this RSX is somehow a replacement to the Integra? So, if Honda designed the next generation NSX for sale in Japan and the rest of the world, but decided to sell it as the "ass-rapist" in the US, you would then claim that the "ass-rapist" was a replacement for the NSX, and not the same car? Do you understand how f&%king stupid that is, or maybe wonder why you are the only idiot here who thinks this way?
Trust me... you have no f#*king clue.
Well, obviously you DO need help finding the important information in this article.
You KEEP SAYING that the RSX is somehow aerodynamically inferior to the Integra....
Why don't you just put down the keyboard and walk away. It doesn't seem as though you have anything useful to provide. Can't you see that as of right now, you are the only person that believes you are right about anything?
Domestic Driving Asshole
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Bremerton, WA
Why do you keep posting? You are wrong. It doesn't matter if you feel justified in being wrong, or if you have some long descriptive reason for being wrong.... YOU ARE WRONG. Drop it.
I'd suggest next time you want to get into a debate on the internet... don't. That is, unless you have a clue about the subject matter and will not argue with others (who are 100% correct) just for the sake of arguing.
I'd suggest next time you want to get into a debate on the internet... don't. That is, unless you have a clue about the subject matter and will not argue with others (who are 100% correct) just for the sake of arguing.
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Originally Posted by TeHJuSTiN
Acura (as well as the Type-S) is United States ONLY.
Im done with this argument.
Im done with this argument.
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
oh and nathan...your article that you wanted me to read....proved my point once again....
"So this review is going to rave about the all-new 2002 Acura RSX Type-S, the replacement for the long-running Integra GS-R. If your leaning is toward high-revving state-of-the-art 4-cylinder engines, then you will believe every word."
THANKS AGAIN
"So this review is going to rave about the all-new 2002 Acura RSX Type-S, the replacement for the long-running Integra GS-R. If your leaning is toward high-revving state-of-the-art 4-cylinder engines, then you will believe every word."
THANKS AGAIN
Domestic Driving Asshole
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Bremerton, WA
Originally Posted by TeHJuSTiN
The RSX is the next generation Integra
Do you see Justin's post? The one I just quoted? Yeah, he was right. Anything else you say is stupid, pointless, and would be arguing for the sake of arguing. You will not be any more correct, nor will any of us will like you any more if you keep this sh!t up. You are wrong. Drop it. Deal with it in your own special way. I don't give a damn how, just do it. I'm fairly certain everyone here is tired of you saying the same sh!t.
ghey slow d16 modder
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
From: fairfax, va
the article is wrong. the acura rsx was designed as the honda integra in japan. they are one in the same car, and there is no difference between the rsx's in the states and the ones all over the world, not including japan, austrailia, and england, where the only difference is that they drive on the other side of the car. the acura name and the rsx name are purely marketing ploys for this country, because a lot people here can't see spending $25k for a honda coupe, and $35-40k for a sedan. the same goes for lexus and, or course, infinity.
i'm not calling you ignorant or names or anything...i just think you should know.
i'm not calling you ignorant or names or anything...i just think you should know.
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
ok, this has gone way too far. all i was saying in the first place was that the integra and rsx to people here in the states are different. they have a different body style. so, when i said ie the integra, i wasn't including the rsx because it has diferent aerodynamics...
you guys blew this one up way out of proportion just because you guys think you are big and bad. thanks for stretching my statements...
:closed:
you guys blew this one up way out of proportion just because you guys think you are big and bad. thanks for stretching my statements...
:closed:
ghey slow d16 modder
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
From: fairfax, va
Originally Posted by acuragal03
ok, this has gone way too far. all i was saying in the first place was that the integra and rsx to people here in the states are different. they have a different body style. so, when i said ie the integra, i wasn't including the rsx because it has diferent aerodynamics...
you guys blew this one up way out of proportion just because you guys think you are big and bad. thanks for stretching my statements...
:closed:
you guys blew this one up way out of proportion just because you guys think you are big and bad. thanks for stretching my statements...
:closed:
just saying that the body styles before the 94 and up integras were still called the integra, even though they looked different. the rsx coulda been called the integra, but wasn't purely for marketing reasons here in the states.
Nissan: Shift_Recall
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
haha, this tread is Hilaaorious. 
Acura basicly scribbled off 'integra' from the back of the car and glued a RSX badge to the back. And the 2002+ integra with RSX glued to the back (and a few smog tweaks here and there) is the replacement for 94-01 integra.... so WTF was this problem about.
EDIT* LOL, sorry didn't realize how old this tread was.
Acura basicly scribbled off 'integra' from the back of the car and glued a RSX badge to the back. And the 2002+ integra with RSX glued to the back (and a few smog tweaks here and there) is the replacement for 94-01 integra.... so WTF was this problem about.
EDIT* LOL, sorry didn't realize how old this tread was.
