"I'll beat him with aerodynamics!"
NAM #0001
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,050
Likes: 0
From: Cornelius, NC
Originally Posted by acuragal03
now, do you really think that the vice pres would let the press say that the rsx was the integras replacement if it wasn't? the only reason why it is still the integra in japan is because its HONDA.
We should probably call back the owner of Top Fuel and tell him to take the Integra badge off of his RSX. Isn't the chassis of the Type-S the DC5R or is that only for the Integra Type-R?
NAM #0001
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,050
Likes: 0
From: Cornelius, NC
Originally Posted by 03accordcoupe
Get off the Import's nuts and get over your biases to realize that Nathan is far more productive on this board than most people
BTW... Watch out for Nathan's dingleberries.
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Originally Posted by Nathan1234
OK. I can usually forgive noobs and their ignorance... I mean, after all, they just got here and don't know how things work. But when they come here and argue with long time members on every post they make, it pisses me off. So, here's where you shut the f*$k up, read my post, and get f*$king owned like the stupid noob you are.
1. Oh, so you think the RSX has really poor aerodynamics, but that Integra (based on a MANY year old body design) is GREAT.
WRONG, STUPID.
2. So the RSX isn't known as the Integra in other places around the world (but not the US, like Justin said)? Really?
NO, NOT REALLY, YOU IGNORANT F*%K.
Since you seem to think you are right on every post, even though you have been a completely ignorant troll the whole time.... what do you have to say to this? (If you need help to find exactly what information in these articles proved you are a dip-shit, I can assist with another post.)
Also, since you never really got an answer to your question:
Look in the mirror. Your ignorant ass and others like you are high on the list of reasons for my membership.
1. Oh, so you think the RSX has really poor aerodynamics, but that Integra (based on a MANY year old body design) is GREAT.
WRONG, STUPID.
2. So the RSX isn't known as the Integra in other places around the world (but not the US, like Justin said)? Really?
NO, NOT REALLY, YOU IGNORANT F*%K.
Since you seem to think you are right on every post, even though you have been a completely ignorant troll the whole time.... what do you have to say to this? (If you need help to find exactly what information in these articles proved you are a dip-shit, I can assist with another post.)
Also, since you never really got an answer to your question:
Look in the mirror. Your ignorant ass and others like you are high on the list of reasons for my membership.
Also, i said that yes, in japan the car that we refer to as the rsx, is still the integra.
Oh, and by the way. Your article that you found also proves my statement....
the rsx is not the integra, it took its place. THANKS.
Push to shock!
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Originally Posted by acuragal03
ok, well obviously you aren't reading correctly. i never said that integras have, as you said, "GREAT," aerodynamics. Secondly, the rsx has more head room than the integra, making the roof higher. This makes the air cut up more than on the streamlined integra. Both have noses that are smaller at the tip, yes the rsx comes to more of a point, but the integras doesn't have such a slope.
Also, i said that yes, in japan the car that we refer to as the rsx, is still the integra.
Oh, and by the way. Your article that you found also proves my statement....
the rsx is not the integra, it took its place. THANKS.
Also, i said that yes, in japan the car that we refer to as the rsx, is still the integra.
Oh, and by the way. Your article that you found also proves my statement....
the rsx is not the integra, it took its place. THANKS.
As for Corvette, BMW, or any other car for that matter do you have any idea how people design the bodies for those cars? Artists come up with a pretty looking shape, and the engineers have to work with that body. Aerodynamics is at best a second rate consideration.
Domestic Driving Asshole
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Bremerton, WA
Originally Posted by TeHJuSTiN
Only in America is it the "Type-S", in Japan it's still the ITR.
Originally Posted by acuragal03
Oh, and by the way. Your article that you found also proves my statement....
the rsx is not the integra, it took its place. THANKS.
the rsx is not the integra, it took its place. THANKS.
Originally Posted by acuragal03
and just because i haven't been a member for long doesn't mean i dont know what is going on.
Originally Posted by acuragal03
ok, well obviously you aren't reading correctly. i never said that integras have, as you said, "GREAT," aerodynamics. Secondly, the rsx has more head room than the integra, making the roof higher. This makes the air cut up more than on the streamlined integra. Both have noses that are smaller at the tip, yes the rsx comes to more of a point, but the integras doesn't have such a slope.
Originally Posted by Nathan1234
(If you need help to find exactly what information in these articles proved you are a dip-shit, I can assist with another post.)
You KEEP SAYING that the RSX is somehow aerodynamically inferior to the Integra....
Originally Posted by From the f*$king article, stupid
Acura officials say drag coefficient has been improved 4 percent over the GS-R.
)