Buddies LS vs. 350z *pics*
S2000 Pilot
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,457
Likes: 0
From: 9000 RPMS
Originally posted by yellow civic ex
im sure every ricer like me dreams of racing a new z. i wonder when i'll get my chance?
...and i hope he's not heavily modded, or i may have a chance.
im sure every ricer like me dreams of racing a new z. i wonder when i'll get my chance?
...and i hope he's not heavily modded, or i may have a chance.
pshh u don't even need to worry, i've never lost to any and i've raced about 5-6 stock/lightly modded ones on 8 psi. They only run low 14's at the track and trap 99-101ish, nothing scary at all.
Some have it, some don't
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: RavensTown, Maryland
Originally posted by Jkan2001
pshh u don't even need to worry, i've never lost to any and i've raced about 5-6 stock/lightly modded ones on 8 psi. They only run low 14's at the track and trap 99-101ish, nothing scary at all.
pshh u don't even need to worry, i've never lost to any and i've raced about 5-6 stock/lightly modded ones on 8 psi. They only run low 14's at the track and trap 99-101ish, nothing scary at all.
Is your car even running yet?BTW - I'm running high 13's at the track, stock, with timeslips to prove it. Give respect where respect is due.
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
im sure every ricer like me dreams of racing a new z. i wonder when i'll get my chance?
are you admiting that you are a ricer?lol
i like the 350z, looks wise. But it is sorta disappointment. I mean 10 years ago the 300zx TT was runnin the same times as the new 350 is. I owuld think i n10 years they could make a little improvement in the performance. I think the same thing about the rx-8 only the rx-8 is even worse. The TT rx-7s were mid 13's stock which is preety damn fast fora stock car and they also responded well to mods( they just werent reliable, to much boost didnt go well with the rotary). And also 10 years later they come out with the rx-8, not only is it not as fast but it is more than a second slower. highs 14's is a dsgrace for performance orriented name as the RX.
S2000 Pilot
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,457
Likes: 0
From: 9000 RPMS
Originally posted by Integrity
Is your car even running yet?
BTW - I'm running high 13's at the track, stock, with timeslips to prove it. Give respect where respect is due.
Is your car even running yet?BTW - I'm running high 13's at the track, stock, with timeslips to prove it. Give respect where respect is due.
yellowcivic EX is well over 200 whp @ 10 psi in a 2500 pound car, it's plenty to rape a stock 350Z and you know it. that's all i was pointing out. I'm going to turbo the SR20 instead and then we'll see who's the top nissan around here :fawk:
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Richmond
Originally posted by Diablo
are you admiting that you are a ricer?lol
i like the 350z, looks wise. But it is sorta disappointment. I mean 10 years ago the 300zx TT was runnin the same times as the new 350 is. I owuld think i n10 years they could make a little improvement in the performance. I think the same thing about the rx-8 only the rx-8 is even worse. The TT rx-7s were mid 13's stock which is preety damn fast fora stock car and they also responded well to mods( they just werent reliable, to much boost didnt go well with the rotary). And also 10 years later they come out with the rx-8, not only is it not as fast but it is more than a second slower. highs 14's is a dsgrace for performance orriented name as the RX.
are you admiting that you are a ricer?lol
i like the 350z, looks wise. But it is sorta disappointment. I mean 10 years ago the 300zx TT was runnin the same times as the new 350 is. I owuld think i n10 years they could make a little improvement in the performance. I think the same thing about the rx-8 only the rx-8 is even worse. The TT rx-7s were mid 13's stock which is preety damn fast fora stock car and they also responded well to mods( they just werent reliable, to much boost didnt go well with the rotary). And also 10 years later they come out with the rx-8, not only is it not as fast but it is more than a second slower. highs 14's is a dsgrace for performance orriented name as the RX.
96 Turbo went for like 40 grand plus... now you can get one
same performance 26 grand or lower.
Besides.. 0-60 5.5 isn't that bad, heck most people would probably try to kill thereselves racing them if they were like the vettes 4.5 seconds or so and 170..
ghey slow d16 modder
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
From: fairfax, va
Originally posted by Integrity
BTW - I'm running high 13's at the track, stock, with timeslips to prove it. Give respect where respect is due.
BTW - I'm running high 13's at the track, stock, with timeslips to prove it. Give respect where respect is due.
^New car...2003 BMW 330ci
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Originally posted by yellow civic ex
i do respect that time. you must be a very good driver to pull those times consistently. what was your 60ft time?
i do respect that time. you must be a very good driver to pull those times consistently. what was your 60ft time?
You shouldnt have trouble taking down stock to lightly modded 350Z's with average drivers. Your car is really damn fast!!!