Notices

2001 Civic: Question about changing transmission fluid

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 23, 2009 | 11:29 AM
  #11  
shirley's Avatar
shirley
CBOTY 2010
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 34,786
Likes: 0
From: MI
Default

Originally Posted by uncleoms2001
I'm sorry scooby, but I feel like you pulled that reasoning out of your ass. Not to flex my wings or anything, but I've got a degree in Biology, and I don't see why you would think that a lubricating medium would change the pH of a transmission. And these "chemicals" are only changed by prolonged heat and pressure, it makes no sense why Honda would engineer lubricants that undergo chemical reactions with the materials that they use to build their components. Changing fluid will simply replenish spent "chemicals" with the originally intended chemicals. What will be removed, is any metal debris (that gets pulled to the magnetic plug). The slipping would more likely be due to the freed room that the metal debris had previously occupied. It's a machine, not a fish tank. CHANGE YOUR FLUIDS REGARDLESS IF YOU MISSED THE DATE.
:rofl:

since when is biology a degree that gives you any standing in automotive ... you just got owned :rofl:
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2009 | 01:27 PM
  #12  
white_n_slow's Avatar
white_n_slow
it's my D in a B
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 24,787
Likes: 1
From: Your Mom's House
Default

I have a degree in baloney, does that count for anything?
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2009 | 11:11 PM
  #13  
Shameinator's Avatar
Shameinator
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Default

Originally Posted by Civic2Scooby
Wow your degree in biology vs my ase certs directly pertaining to the subject and hands on real world experience. On high mileage transmissions, fluid change is a crap shoot because one has no way of knowing the extent of internal wear. When the old fluid gets burnt and worn out, the transmission experiences excessive internal wear, this causes the unit to heat up, heat causes the glue on the clutches to become brittle and to crystallize. When new fluid is introduced into the unit, the high detergent aspect of the new fluid scrubs the old glue away from the back of the clutches rendering the transmission useless.

Also, the gritty debris in the trans fluid adds friction that is much needed with the extremely worn clutch packs from neglect and abuse. When you "flush" the old gritty metal filled fluid and replace it with slippery and heavily detergent laden ATF, you actually greatly increase the amount the transmission will slip, and eventually the transmission will fail.

I will surrender the fact that I may have used "PH" improperly in my above statement, I was merely trying to figure out a way to describe replacing a fluid that had burnt out the adatives with new ATF that has new detremental and harsh detergents.

Maybe you shouldn't pull advice out of your ass While the way I tried to explain it may have failed, don't ever come in here trying to "Flex your wings" on a subject you have no inkling of knowledge about. Sorry Mr. Biology, just flexing MY wings.

wned::jlammy:
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2009 | 02:32 AM
  #14  
CivicSiRacer's Avatar
CivicSiRacer
Honorary Moderator Alumni
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 8,735
Likes: 0
From: Someplace with cones=AUTO
Default

Originally Posted by Civic2Scooby
Wow your degree in biology vs my ase certs directly pertaining to the subject and hands on real world experience. On high mileage transmissions, fluid change is a crap shoot because one has no way of knowing the extent of internal wear. When the old fluid gets burnt and worn out, the transmission experiences excessive internal wear, this causes the unit to heat up, heat causes the glue on the clutches to become brittle and to crystallize. When new fluid is introduced into the unit, the high detergent aspect of the new fluid scrubs the old glue away from the back of the clutches rendering the transmission useless.

Also, the gritty debris in the trans fluid adds friction that is much needed with the extremely worn clutch packs from neglect and abuse. When you "flush" the old gritty metal filled fluid and replace it with slippery and heavily detergent laden ATF, you actually greatly increase the amount the transmission will slip, and eventually the transmission will fail.

I will surrender the fact that I may have used "PH" improperly in my above statement, I was merely trying to figure out a way to describe replacing a fluid that had burnt out the adatives with new ATF that has new detremental and harsh detergents.

Maybe you shouldn't pull advice out of your ass While the way I tried to explain it may have failed, don't ever come in here trying to "Flex your wings" on a subject you have no inkling of knowledge about. Sorry Mr. Biology, just flexing MY wings.
I was just about to say the same thing. The extra shards and metal filings were probably helping the tranny not slip.

But yes the pH can change also in the tranny fluid as he said. The heating and cooling changes the chemistry slighty as well as adding more metal to the fluid. Especially if you haven't changed it in well over 100,000 miles. Heck I change mine about once every two years and I only drive about 10,000 miles a year.
__________________
Sponsored by: KAM Racing Sports, Falken Tires, Progress Technology, Brady's High Performance, Taggart Performance Engineering, Rotora Brakes
Autocross is: 90% driver, 5% car, & 5% CRAZY MOJO!
Autocross Help Page
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2009 | 02:13 AM
  #15  
uncleoms2001's Avatar
uncleoms2001
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Default

Wow, everyone who said that I was owned needs to read a book above elementary school level. Paraphrasing someone's argument doesn't equate to correcting them.

This is what I said:
Changing fluid will simply replenish spent "chemicals" with the originally intended chemicals. What will be removed, is any metal debris (that gets pulled to the magnetic plug). The slipping would more likely be due to the freed room that the metal debris had previously occupied.

This is what Scooby said:
When the old fluid gets burnt and worn out, ... [and] new fluid is introduced into the unit, the high detergent aspect of the new fluid scrubs the old glue away from the back of the clutches rendering the transmission useless.

Scooby, I guess you never got ASE certified for plagiarism. You see that's when you take one person's idea, either directly or indirectly, and make it your own. So if I was talking out of my ass, I guess you were the second round of shit to come after some bad bowel movements.

Jess, mechanical systems are our best attempts at mimicking life systems. For this reason, I pulled out of my ass what Scooby paid to get certified for. And for this reason, I do for fun what Scooby does to pay the bills.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2009 | 02:45 AM
  #16  
CivicSiRacer's Avatar
CivicSiRacer
Honorary Moderator Alumni
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 8,735
Likes: 0
From: Someplace with cones=AUTO
Default

Originally Posted by uncleoms2001
Wow, everyone who said that I was owned needs to read a book above elementary school level. Paraphrasing someone's argument doesn't equate to correcting them.

This is what I said:
Changing fluid will simply replenish spent "chemicals" with the originally intended chemicals. What will be removed, is any metal debris (that gets pulled to the magnetic plug). The slipping would more likely be due to the freed room that the metal debris had previously occupied.

This is what Scooby said:
When the old fluid gets burnt and worn out, ... [and] new fluid is introduced into the unit, the high detergent aspect of the new fluid scrubs the old glue away from the back of the clutches rendering the transmission useless.

Scooby, I guess you never got ASE certified for plagiarism. You see that's when you take one person's idea, either directly or indirectly, and make it your own. So if I was talking out of my ass, I guess you were the second round of shit to come after some bad bowel movements.

Jess, mechanical systems are our best attempts at mimicking life systems. For this reason, I pulled out of my ass what Scooby paid to get certified for. And for this reason, I do for fun what Scooby does to pay the bills.
You realize arguing on forums just makes you guys look stupid? Take it to messaging.
__________________
Sponsored by: KAM Racing Sports, Falken Tires, Progress Technology, Brady's High Performance, Taggart Performance Engineering, Rotora Brakes
Autocross is: 90% driver, 5% car, & 5% CRAZY MOJO!
Autocross Help Page
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2009 | 03:46 PM
  #17  
Civic2Scooby's Avatar
Civic2Scooby
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 28,282
Likes: 0
From: michigan
Default

Originally Posted by uncleoms2001
Wow, everyone who said that I was owned needs to read a book above elementary school level. Paraphrasing someone's argument doesn't equate to correcting them.

This is what I said:
Changing fluid will simply replenish spent "chemicals" with the originally intended chemicals. What will be removed, is any metal debris (that gets pulled to the magnetic plug). The slipping would more likely be due to the freed room that the metal debris had previously occupied.

This is what Scooby said:
When the old fluid gets burnt and worn out, ... [and] new fluid is introduced into the unit, the high detergent aspect of the new fluid scrubs the old glue away from the back of the clutches rendering the transmission useless.

Scooby, I guess you never got ASE certified for plagiarism. You see that's when you take one person's idea, either directly or indirectly, and make it your own. So if I was talking out of my ass, I guess you were the second round of shit to come after some bad bowel movements.

Jess, mechanical systems are our best attempts at mimicking life systems. For this reason, I pulled out of my ass what Scooby paid to get certified for. And for this reason, I do for fun what Scooby does to pay the bills.
you seem confused little boy, if I was paraphrasing you I wouldn't have added actual real life information on what detriment you are doing to the transmission. In the end you told them to change the fluid no matter what, which is wrong. Thus, you may have actually caused a member of our community to improperly service a high mileage transmission because you think you are some awesome biologist.

Oh, I never said that is what I do to pay the bills .

if I wanna teach a high school sophomore the difference between mitosis and meiosis I'll point him to your classroom. If people want information provided from knowledgeable and experienced members, perhaps they should take advice from people who "pay their bills doing this"

Last edited by Civic2Scooby; Oct 25, 2009 at 06:10 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2009 | 06:12 PM
  #18  
Civic2Scooby's Avatar
Civic2Scooby
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 28,282
Likes: 0
From: michigan
Default

Originally Posted by CivicSiRacer
You realize arguing on forums just makes you guys look stupid? Take it to messaging.
What argument? Some noob came in here and tried to swing around his dick and failed. I'm done in here, sorry to have awoken the mods
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2009 | 08:30 AM
  #19  
uncleoms2001's Avatar
uncleoms2001
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Default

Ok, I don't have the time to school in you on how to pose strong arguments, so I'll stop for the sake of everyone else. I will say one thing, your OPINION is not FACT by far. It was your opinion against mine, someone who understands science vs. a grease monkey with some certificates. As usual, your argument of me being a noob is also unfounded as you probably based it on the few posts that I have made on this forum compared to the lifetime worth of posting on forums that you do. As for the back and forth, I made this public because lots of people on these forums need to learn how to extract FACTS and form their own OPINIONS rather than blindly following certain members who abuse mechanical and scientific jargon and post questionable avatars.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2009 | 09:04 AM
  #20  
Civic2Scooby's Avatar
Civic2Scooby
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 28,282
Likes: 0
From: michigan
Default

Originally Posted by uncleoms2001
Ok, I don't have the time to school in you on how to pose strong arguments, so I'll stop for the sake of everyone else. I will say one thing, your OPINION is not FACT by far. It was your opinion against mine, someone who understands science vs. a grease monkey with some certificates. As usual, your argument of me being a noob is also unfounded as you probably based it on the few posts that I have made on this forum compared to the lifetime worth of posting on forums that you do. As for the back and forth, I made this public because lots of people on these forums need to learn how to extract FACTS and form their own OPINIONS rather than blindly following certain members who abuse mechanical and scientific jargon and post questionable avatars.
I didn't infer you were a noob based on post count, but on the fact that you blindly post mis-information. Let's play a little game. You go ahead and contact the members of this forum and ask them how many times I have helped with an actual problem using my magical "grease monkey opinion" and then ask them how many times biology man saved the day. If you need somebody to put down to make yourself feel better, I don't mind being it. I get that you are a depressed middle school science teacher and this is your only outlet. Maybe one day my kids will take your class and you can build cells out of shoe boxes.

Last edited by Civic2Scooby; Oct 26, 2009 at 09:11 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:12 AM.