I must say...
Banned
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,220
Likes: 0
Originally posted by FLAT_LINER
fully built? u do know that b18c1 is 170hp stock
fully built? u do know that b18c1 is 170hp stock
he was refering to the wheels...not the fly, but he is underrating his motor...im sure he will get on a dyno for numbers on paper as soon as he gets it broken it.
Thread Starter
Still here... sorta...
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,177
Likes: 2
From: CO
Originally posted by Jkan2001
eh...BOV owns vtec
I'd rather have a notec turbo LS on 10 pounds than a fully built ITR or CTR with vtec out the wazoo
eh...BOV owns vtec
I'd rather have a notec turbo LS on 10 pounds than a fully built ITR or CTR with vtec out the wazoo
Originally posted by westcoaststyle
The sound of the secondary intake engaging is one of the sweetest sounds on the face of the planet! just behind turbo wine and blowoff valve ~whoosh~) :drool:
The sound of the secondary intake engaging is one of the sweetest sounds on the face of the planet! just behind turbo wine and blowoff valve ~whoosh~) :drool:
sancho on the sizzide!
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 27,129
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Bumnah
i sensed sarcasm at that previous post. now i know for sure it was really sarcasm.
__________________
[ASIANDOOOD.COM] [INSPIRE USA] [FACEBOOK] [ENDLESS 8]
F/S: JDM EG9 Parts - PM me for info
[ASIANDOOOD.COM] [INSPIRE USA] [FACEBOOK] [ENDLESS 8]
F/S: JDM EG9 Parts - PM me for info
Thread Starter
Still here... sorta...
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,177
Likes: 2
From: CO
Originally posted by Bumnah
you are still a ricer though whom i flamed when you first start posting. :fawk:
you are still a ricer though whom i flamed when you first start posting. :fawk:
Originally posted by FLAT_LINER
fully built? u do know that b18c1 is 170hp stock
fully built? u do know that b18c1 is 170hp stock
Originally posted by crucial Si
he was refering to the wheels...not the fly, but he is underrating his motor...im sure he will get on a dyno for numbers on paper as soon as he gets it broken it.
he was refering to the wheels...not the fly, but he is underrating his motor...im sure he will get on a dyno for numbers on paper as soon as he gets it broken it.
I really hope your right crucial, I hope I'm underrating it.
I'm at 70 miles right now and just changed the oil again. I'm being super careful with it. I prolly won't change it again until I'm at 500 or so. Then again at 1000.
I think both my inner CV joints are bad.. they don't pop, but whenever I turn right, I get this odd creeking sound. I'm gunna take it down to the tranny shop sometime this week and tell the guy that built my tranny about it. Maybe he fawked something up.
Thread Starter
Still here... sorta...
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,177
Likes: 2
From: CO
No cams. My head has been refurbished with all new seals/gaskets, has a 3 angle valve job, port matched on the intake side, and has been decked just a tad.
The cylinders were bored out 0.010 and everything has been balanced (crank, rods w/ pistons, clutch, flywheel, crank pulley). I think that I will have lost a little power from the loss in compression, but it's worth it to me to have less power now and have that much more when the turbo goes on it. :naughty:
The cylinders were bored out 0.010 and everything has been balanced (crank, rods w/ pistons, clutch, flywheel, crank pulley). I think that I will have lost a little power from the loss in compression, but it's worth it to me to have less power now and have that much more when the turbo goes on it. :naughty:
NinJA
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
From: WISCONSIN
Originally posted by Bumnah
i was being sarcastic to crucial si's post.
i think the gsr manifold is an awesome idea.
it has different runners for the low end, and runners for when you high in the rev range.
the runners for the low end the air moves slower, for the high end they are setup for velocity.
for a production it's a good idea. it was honda's first try at it i believe.
the type r doesn't have a similar manifold manily cause it's setup to make power higher up, and the manifold is only focused on that.
the rsx-s uses a dual stage manifold, so do some h22 and h23's.
coo ****.
btw incase you didn't notice was being sarcastic when i replied to your post also.
you are still a ricer though whom i flamed when you first start posting. :fawk:
i was being sarcastic to crucial si's post.
i think the gsr manifold is an awesome idea.
it has different runners for the low end, and runners for when you high in the rev range.
the runners for the low end the air moves slower, for the high end they are setup for velocity.
for a production it's a good idea. it was honda's first try at it i believe.
the type r doesn't have a similar manifold manily cause it's setup to make power higher up, and the manifold is only focused on that.
the rsx-s uses a dual stage manifold, so do some h22 and h23's.
coo ****.
btw incase you didn't notice was being sarcastic when i replied to your post also.
you are still a ricer though whom i flamed when you first start posting. :fawk:
Thread Starter
Still here... sorta...
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,177
Likes: 2
From: CO
Originally posted by ManTiS
You've obviously never been in anything except a Civic DX, huh?
You've obviously never been in anything except a Civic DX, huh?
I've also been in my buddy's '01 GSR and it makes the same sound as mine... I guess it's just the fact that it's my hybrid and it makes me happy to know that I built something that not a lot of people can and it works well. :thumbup: