93 civic - Tubro or Engine swap????
Originally posted by westcoaststyle
Describe 'stock boost'. :chuckles:
Did you mean stock compression?? or low boost??
And yes, I agree that you will be able to prolly beat an Si, but you will be limited to that. If you do an engine swap, you aren't limited at all. A turbod B16A2/3 would give a Mustang GT a really good run.
JMO
Describe 'stock boost'. :chuckles:
Did you mean stock compression?? or low boost??
And yes, I agree that you will be able to prolly beat an Si, but you will be limited to that. If you do an engine swap, you aren't limited at all. A turbod B16A2/3 would give a Mustang GT a really good run.
JMO
Originally posted by Jkan2001
uhh a single cam turbo would give a mustang GT a good run. Bret on this board rapes em like nothing else with a turboed HX.
uhh a single cam turbo would give a mustang GT a good run. Bret on this board rapes em like nothing else with a turboed HX.

I still say swap
cx power!
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 0
From: berkeley, ca --> la, ca representin' tha 510&626
Originally posted by ManTiS
Now there is a FAT opinion with no backing.
Now there is a FAT opinion with no backing.
i drive A LOT. i dont want to worry bout leaky hoses, vaccum lines, turbo timers, inline fuel pumps, etc. im thinking of boosting eventually, but it takes a lot of time and $$ to do it right. you're adding a lot of equipment to your car which can lead to problems down the line, hence the reduced reliability.
i drive 30kmi anually, and until i dont have to drive as much, no boost for me.


